Monday, October 20, 2025
Home Blog Page 49

Gallery Review: Trevor Martin’s “Lake Effect” at the Morlan Gallery

Lake Effect, the first exhibit of the Morlan Gallery’s 2018-2019 season, is a product of both the Transy-specific space and the curatorial mind of a Transy graduate.

Transy 1992 alum and Executive Director of Exhibitions at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago Trevor Martin is the curator for Lake Effect. The show was installed over the period of two days in the middle of August, which forced Martin to make decisions as the curator based on the his intuition and quick thinking with the artists in the room. “I have to admit, I’ve never installed a show in two days so I was racking my brain thinking ‘is this possible’?”

Transy alum showing his passion for art. Photo by Gabby Crooks

Lake Effect was inspired by an invitation from Transy art professor, Jack Girard who “made me understand the power of art and power of creative force” said Martin, who studied with Girard during his years as a student at Transy. “He invited me to think about an exhibition here. The invitation was really about makers, particularly painters who were dealing with scale, with layers, with texture, with surface.” The pieces in the exhibit are not tied to any strict definition of art form. Some pieces are sculptures while others are distorted pictures, paintings, and even a silent video.

Lake Effect is not a traditional exhibit and the way the works are displayed is meant to plays with dimension and the viewers’ perception of the art. “We installed them purposefully kind of defying the typical rules of gallery installation that everything is hung at a certain eye level. A lot of these pieces are hung down in the corner or next to the floor or up top near the ceiling to draw attention to the architecture of the room.” Every space and relationship between the works was intentional. Martin explained, “As we were installing these works, we were conscious of relations between the works and what distance or space or pause of a blank section of a wall might be and the dialogues.”

He had all four artists, Claire Ashley, Susanna Coffey, Jaclyn Mednicov, and Maryam Taghavi, think about how to use the space of Morlan Gallery as inspiration and the exhibition opportunity.Martin says that he wanted “to mention that they’re all women, which I feel very proud about, because the history of lots of museum collections are dominated by men and historically, women have not gotten their fair share of representations.”

Susanna Coffey, the F.H. Sellers Professor in Painting at SAIC contributed a suite of portraits to the exhibit. “I specifically asked for a suite of portraits and in one of them I can literally see her face and the others are very abstract images that are almost like visual puzzles to me. If I am to interpret these as portraits, they have a psychological charge.”

Coffey’s method of creating her art is unconventional and began when she taught a figurative painting class a few years ago. She wanted to understand how figurative painting works and what that means in order to better teach her students. “As a new faculty member with limited, modest funds who couldn’t necessarily hire models or pay model fees to pose for her, she turned to herself. She set the mirror in front of her and started painting her own image.”

Some of Coffey’s paintings hang on the wall behind Martin. Photo by Gabby Crooks.

“They’re not flattering self portraits. It’s her image, it’s often her face, but sometimes she’s in these glasses, in a weird hat, she looks like she’s sunburned, she has volcanoes going off behind her. A lot of it is about the study of technique and material.” Coffey’s paintings, shown in the featured image, all invite the viewers to interpret her work.

Another one of the talented artists, Claire Ashley, is an adjunct associate professor at SAIC. Ashley “creates a lot of these inflatables as costumes that people can wear and dance in. Claire talks a lot about inspirations for her work that includes having children, growing up, and the

Vibrant colors and interesting masterpieces, this is Lake Effect. Photo by Gabby Crooks

“They have this relationship to the human body. She [Ashley] embraces humor a lot and humor is valuable. They invite us to touch them and we want to touch them and interact with them because they’re so fun.”

Martin, pointing to one of Ashley’s pieces near the gallery’s air duct, laughs, “I think this might be one of the first moments where that air duct has actually become a part of an installation piece in the show.”

Ashley doesn’t just create large inflatables. She also integrated some smaller, plaster sculptures into the exhibit that are “sprinkled throughout the exhibition” said Martin, “It kind of adds a hide-and-seek quality” to the exhibit. Some of her pieces intertwine with artist Jaclyn Mednicov’s art pieces. Mednicov is a Chicago-based artists who creates unique pieces by using distorted images. “Jaclyn does these amazing pieces that are all about surface. She often takes photographs of things she find in the world will print those photos sometimes printing them oversize and then she has this process in which she covers the surface of that photographic image with hand sanitizer with alcohol and then prints them, usually oversized and then she coats the image with hand sanitizer and the alcohol and the ink react react so it creates this release of the ink onto another surface so they become a mono-print.”

Photo by Gabby Crooks. Now open the Morlan Gallery exhibit Lake Effect.

Martin said that Mednicov’s work is all about “layering, challenging ideas of representation.” Jaclyn Mednicov created a new wallpaper piece for Morlan that covers the entire wall using images she captured from Instagram in addition to images she took herself, Martin explained. “She was taking and scanning and manipulating them, printing them, and distressing that image. A lot of that is about challenging ideas of representation and scale and form. The moths are as big as the birds or the ants or the beetles.”

The last artist, Maryam Taghavi, who is from Tehran just received New Artist Society Scholarship to complete her MFA at SAIC in performance. Taghavi’s contribution to the exhibit is in the form of a silent video in which she carries a mirror the size of her body through the Art Institute of Chicago. “She had to get special permission to carry this through this museum, did it early in the morning before anybody else was there to avoid any hazards of breaking or bumping into public, and in some ways, it’s the study of the space because she was there carrying the mirror, there’s a camera person with her, there’s a guard escorting them. It’s this visual study of the building before it’s entirely awake before visitors come.” said Martin. “I debate, what we’re seeing here, is this video the work or was the work the actual performance of carrying this object through that collection and really to experience the original work, would we have to be there at 8:30 in the morning and watch her do it? Is it documentation of the performance, is it performance for camera intended in that way, like what is the elemental quality of how we position this work.”

Bursting with life and color. Photo by Gabby Crooks

“Everything that we see reflected in the mirror is equalized, it’s all of equal value.The corner of the ceiling is just as valuable as the Monet painting, so it’s all it’s all kind of breaking open and questioning ‘what is our visual field?’ I think it’s important that we note that She’s carrying this through the art institute which is referred to as an encylopedic museum meaning that it collects work not of one specific genre but of representing many different cultures. Institutions of this sort are often dominated as is the art institute is by male artists. We think about the history of the absence of women and it’s often western art that is focused on. So what does it mean for Mariam who is a non-western female artists to be carrying this mirror through a museum? She’s hidden behind the mirror. We see her feet, hands, legs, she’s intentionally absented herself from this space that proclaims to represent many cultures and many artistic practices. It has embedded in it this institutional critique of what museums say they do and what they do.”

https://transyrambler.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Trevor-Martin-Lake-Effect.mp3

“I find this piece meditative. It’s silent, it doesn’t have a soundtrack on top of it, it allows us to insert our own imaginary narrative on what we’re seeing.”


This exhibit will run through October 18th. The gallery will be closed October 15th and 16th for Fall Break.

Further Reading: 4 Questions to Ask When Comparing Midterm Candidates

This article is republished from ProPublica under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The original article was written by Cynthia Gordy Giwa. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.


This year’s midterms are getting more attention than usual, with high stakes for both parties. You’ve probably seen a fair amount of “horse race” coverage focusing on competition between rival candidates while downplaying policies and platforms. But if you know how to read these stories, it helps you understand what’s at stake for you and can even inform your own political participation. (Get more information like this by signing up for ProPublica’s User’s Guide to Democracy.)

Think about it this way: The campaigns themselves are constantly watching certain signals — polls, fundraising, public opinion — to understand what’s going on in their races. They want to know, “What should we do next if we want to win this election?” And they adjust their tactics accordingly.

You have the power to adjust your actions, too.

See below for the important questions you should be asking yourself as we get closer to the midterms.

1. How competitive is your district?

The Cook Political Report provides real-time analysis on whether your current representative will have an easy time hanging onto their seat or if a challenger has a shot at defeating them.

The Cook Report is a nonpartisan newsletter that analyzes federal elections and campaigns — watching polls, tracking fundraising and outside spending, and talking to the campaigns and candidates — in order to assign a daily rating on the competitiveness of each race:

  • Solid (Republican or Democrat): These races are not considered competitive and are not likely to become closely contested.
  • Likely (Republican or Democrat): These seats are not considered competitive at this point, but they have the potential to become engaged.
  • Lean (Republican or Democrat): These are considered competitive races, but one party has an advantage.
  • Toss-Up: These are the most competitive; either party has a good chance of winning.

These ratings are updated daily, all based on what’s happening on the campaign trail. Look up where your district is for the:

2. Where’s the money?

Political organizations and nonprofit committees have spent hundreds of millions of dollars influencing the midterm elections, so tracking your candidates’ campaign finances is another insightful metric. Where did they get all that money, and how are they spending it?

One detail that can help you determine the strength of a campaign is the percentage of funds raised from individuals vs. PACs, or political action committees. A PAC is simply a collection of individuals who have pooled their money to donate to candidates. The best funded PACs are affiliated with corporations and interest groups — the NRA, Planned Parenthood and labor unions all have PACs — but they can also be funded by civically engaged folks who aren’t political operators.

A reliance on PACs, versus individual donors, can tell you something about a candidate’s institutional support versus grassroots support. A higher percentage of funds from PACs means a candidate’s donor money comes mostly in fairly large checks, as opposed to donations from individuals. A higher percentage of individual donations, on the other hand, is a sign of grassroots enthusiasm about the campaign.

To look up specific campaign fundraising details by candidate OR race type, check out ProPublica’s Election Databot.

3. But what do the numbers mean?

Most political fundraising amounts sound like a LOT of money to the average person. So, how do you know what those numbers mean?

Campaigns need cash to get their messages out, and in a competitive race it can be hard to be on television or to organize rallies if you’re not raising a ton of money.

That’s where the Cook Report ranking numbers come in handy: More competitive races typically attract more money. A toss-up race is likely to have two candidates who have raised more money than many other candidates in less competitive contests.

You can also look at the money gap between two candidates. If a candidate is at the lower end of the fundraising scale, particularly against a well-funded competitor, that usually indicates their chances are not great. (But there are exceptions — see June’s Democratic primary race in New York’s 14th Congressional District, in which 28-year-old challenger Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated the highly funded incumbent congressman Joe Crowley in a major upset. So don’t stop believin’ if your candidate of choice is outspent. Money is important, but it’s not the only factor in getting elected.)

4. What about the issues?

Back in 2016 the Google trends team worked with journalists to identify a list of the issues and topics that voters might be interested in ahead of the election. The Google Trends team ranks search interest in those topics at the congressional district level. Sign up for the User’s Guide to Democracy newsletter to get the most-searched election issues in your district.

Another way to look into your candidates’ issues is to look up your candidates’ press releases on ProPublica’s Represent database. Done well, press releases are a way for candidates to tell voters who they are and set their positions on issues. (These can also conveniently double as venue for trash-talking their opponents.)

Look up your candidates. Are they speaking to issues that actually concern people in your district?

For your local races, the League of Women Voters has the goods

There’s only so much ProPublica can track with our data on federal candidates — which is why we’ve partnered with the League of Women Voters, which has a trove of information all the way down your ballot. The League is nonpartisan and works to arm citizens with the information they need to confidently vote.

For its Vote411.org project, the League reached out to every single candidate running for local and state office and asked each one a set of identical questions, like:

  • What experiences qualify you to represent the citizens living in your district?
  • What would be your top three priorities if elected?
  • How will you work to increase job opportunities for your constituents?

Because the League has so much juice in the political space, the majority of candidates actually answered, in their own words, allowing you to see where those running for office in your community stand on the issues.

You can get a list of all the information that the League of Women Voters has on local, state and federal candidates and ballot measures by searching for your address or state here.

Homework

Now that you can put race ratings, campaign statements and fundraising into context, use the Election DataBot to look up the latest information in your own House and Senate races.

You can also sign up for DataBot email alerts on changes in your races.

Rambler Weekly Playlist & Blog October 12th

Hey Y’all!

Happy Fall Break! This week’s playlist is filled with some mellow lo-fi beats and a couple of smooth R&B hits for a relaxing break away from the chaos midterms have caused throughout campus.

This week has been packed with exciting arts events, from the emotional choral drama, Considering Matthew Shepard to the interesting talk with podcast star, Dylan Marron.

Stay chill,

Taylor

Tuesday, October 16th @6:30pm-9:30pm, MFA Carrick Theater

Join Mayor Jim Gray, Linda Blackford, and Maurice Manning for a discussion on journalism and politics, “Democracy & the Informed Citizen.” This panel will include a scholar, mayor, and journalist.

This event is brought to students by Kentucky Humanities, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Transylvania University, and the National Endowment for the Humanities. The conversation will be moderated by Dr. Michael Cairo.

Thursday, October 18th @4:30pm, MFA Carrick Theater

Transy will be hosting author James Mustich who wrote the book, “1,000 Books to Read Before You Die: A Life-Changing List.” Come join the conversation for a chance to discuss civility! The event is part of Transylvania’s Creative Intelligence Series and New Frontiers season.


New State Dept. regulations won’t affect May Term travel

0

The U.S. Department of State (USDOS) has revised the categories of safety for international travel. Instead of just two categories, Travel Alerts and Travel Warnings, State has now created four levels. Level 1: Exercise normal precautions, Level 2: Exercise increased cautions, Level 3: Reconsider travel, and Level 4: Do not travel.

Transylvania’s International Travel and Response Advisory Committee (ITRAC) reviews safety protocols and policies for University-supported international travel, and has revised those protocols to reflect the new system. Transy students can now travel to Level 1 and 2 countries without review, unless there are parts of that country ranked Level 3 or 4.

This May Term, Dr. Paul Jones and Dr. Frank Russell will be teaching “Journey Through The Bible,” a travel course through Egypt, Jordan, and Israel. These countries all have Level 2 advisories, so increased cautions are highly recommended. But because Egypt and Israel have areas that are ranked as Level 4, some parts of each country are prohibited for travel.

If there are Level 3 or 4 areas within Level 1 and 2 countries, faculty are prohibited from taking students to those areas. To travel to Level 3 countries, faculty must have prior approval through a recommendation to Transylvania’s president from ITRAC. Travel to Level 4 areas, on the other hand, is strictly prohibited. 

The new system is intended to give more detailed information about safety while traveling. Safety hazards such as crime, terrorism, civil unrest, health, natural disasters, and time-limited events are all represented, according to the State Department.

“Without question these rules are essential for the safety of everyone,” says Dr. Jones.

But Dr. Jones says that Journey Through The Bible” will be perfectly safe. “In fact, the Egypt and Israel travel advisory levels have improved vis-à-vis the former security system. I was in Israel this summer with a group of adults, and no one voiced security concerns.”

Transylvania recommends all students study abroad at least once. “I firmly believe a liberal education includes the realization that we are all global citizens,” says Dr. Jones. “Travel abroad is a proven path to this goal.”


Rebecca Blankenship contributed reporting for this article.

New scholarships promised to Bryan Station students

0

Starting in 2019, Transy will guarantee admitted graduates from Bryan Station High School’s Academy of Information Technology (AIT) a minimum of $18,000 in scholarships.

Transy has been developing this scholarship program with Bryan Station High School for about three years now. “There are similar agreements between Transy and other high schools in the Lexington area such as Henry Clay, Tates Creek, and Lexington Catholic,” said President Seamus Carey.

“We want qualified students who, in the past, might not have considered Transy for college to take a close look at us.”

AIT is a top school in the Lexington area and the longest-established Academy within Bryan Station. Its main mission is to prepare and educate students in computer programming, video and cinematography, and graphic design.

The average financial aid package Transy offers students is around $27,000 per year. This average amount of financial aid, along with the scholarship program offered at AIT, may appeal to a wider selection of students who may have considered Transy, but could not afford the cost.

“We are excited to welcome a diverse pool of qualified students to apply to Transy,” Carey said.

Craig Hella Johnson on responding musically to Matthew Shepard’s murder

Rambler Media Advisor Tom Martin interviewed Craig Hella Johnson, the composer and conductor of Considering Matthew Shepard, in last week’s edition of Eastern Standard, an NPR radio program offering a weekly “slice of Kentucky life.”

The choral drama is based on the life and death of Matthew Shepard, a gay man who was tortured and murdered in Laramie, Wyoming, in 1998.

Below are excerpts from the interview which have been lightly edited for content and clarity. The full interview is available here.

Considering Matthew Shepard will be performed on campus at 7:30 tonight in Haggin Auditorium. Admission is free.


Tom: So, first, to help us know what to expect when we attend the performance, could you tell us more about the piece? What is its intention?

Craig: Yeah. This is about a 100-minute with no intermission concert linked performance with about 30 singers and 8 instrumentalist. I conduct this piece from the piano and—let’s see, the intention. The name of this piece is Considering Matthew Shepard. And my own purpose, maybe I have a few avenues to mention there, but I think I wanted to bring memory so that we wouldn’t forget Matthew Shepard and his story. And also that we would remember the lessons that we have been learning from his life and his death. I call it a singing meditation where I invite listeners in a performance to experience this work, which as you said, you know, has a variety of musical styles and which is very intentional for me, it’s to invite everyone so that we might be together with almost a communal listening experience for 100 minutes and really contemplate not just this story, but our own journeys in life. And in some ways, people have said it’s kind of a call to return back home to love, to really remembering in our deepest selves what it is to hold each other and love, to love each other, to treat each other well and with great affection and connection. So, it’s a musical framework that kind of serves as a meditation, as an invitation. It’s certainly telling a difficult story on the one hand, but really we often in performing it feel quite connected, and hopeful, and uplifted. It’s a sort of multilevel experience.

Tom: I’m really, curious, Craig, how and when did it occur to you that Matthew’s story could be an appropriate subject for a major musical work like this?

Craig: Well, I mean, my response was really personal and felt like a heart response back in 1998, when Matt was beaten and then when he died five days later. I learned about this from one of the singers in Chanticleer, a group I was the artistic director of at that time. And he shared this news with me and then I learned more of course in the days to follow. And it just pierced me. Like it did so many people around the world. And I knew I felt at that time just an impulse, like I wanna respond to this. I wanna write, whether I write a song or am I gonna create something. So the impulse was very immediate and then it took me a long, long time to become ready to actually do it. So I waited, and waited, and waited in a way maybe kind of wanting to avoid it, you know, and yet it kept calling out to me. And eventually, I said I need do this. It feels like one of the things I’m supposed to express in this life.

Tom: Have you had contact with Matthew’s family and have they heard the piece?

Craig: Yes. Yes. Absolutely. They’ve been incredibly supportive from the beginning. And they have so many requests and they don’t say yes a lot. So to have their blessing has just meant everything to me and they have both heard the work in complete performance. They’ve heard recordings before. But about a year ago, Judy [Matthew’s mother] was in Boston Symphony Hall with us in her first full live performance. And just very recently Dennis [Matthew’s father] was with us, and that was his first full live performance. And we did talk with him, and that was a very moving thing to have him. And a year ago to have Judy in the hall with us, it just shaped our whole performance.


Eastern Standard runs Thursdays at 11:00 AM on NPR-WEKU 88.9 FM.

‘Elkhorn’ is Richard Taylor’s meditation on Topophilia

Richard Taylor’s newest book, Elkhorn: Evolution of a Kentucky Landscape (University Press of Kentucky 2018), is a passionate meditation on the history of Elkhorn Creek, and the author’s home within the surrounding landscape. As such, it presents a variety of historically and culturally significant historical anecdotes with each chapter. These anecdotes are preceded by fictionalized accounts, which imagine the daily lives of the creek’s most impactful historical players.

The most important resonant thread within the work is the author’s dedication to “Topophilia,” or love of place. When asked about the importance of place, Taylor informed me that “knowing one’s place is essential to fully appreciating it.”

He expanded, “[place is] important for the very practical reason that if we do not love the places we are, we tend to abuse them, we tend to be indifferent to them. If we are indifferent, we create… ecological disasters.”

Due to the creek’s palisades and its dangerous rapids, it has been mostly let alone by industry. Therefore Elkhorn remains a popular attraction for fisherpeople, kayakers, and nature walkers. In reflection of these facts, Taylor writes hoping to increase appreciation for the natural landscapes of Kentucky.

Taylor, an English professor and Transylvania’s Kenan visiting writer, is most noted for his poetry. But he chose to write this book as creative nonfiction, citing a wish to convey factual nuance. Though poems are referenced within the text, Taylor says he wished to approach the subject of Elkhorn’s history with a more exact construction than poetry often allows.

The narrative vignettes preceding each chapter add an element of intrigue to the work. For example, the italicized text before a section on Judge Harry Innes invites the reader to imagine Innes as a lover of land over law by depicting him planting the first trees in what would eventually become a grand orchard. The orchard is factual; the sentiment, assumed.

In another endearing feat of imagination, Taylor also imagines famous Kentucky artist, Paul Sawyier, using water from Elkhorn to wet his brushes as he depicted scenes from the creek in his paintings. In these spots, Taylor brings the stagnant facts and figures of history to life with artful prose and creativity. 

A passion project and a thoroughly researched piece of creative nonfiction, Taylor’s work truly earns the University Press of Kentucky’s Thomas D. Clark Medallion, an award reserved for books concerning Kentucky history and culture. I recommend Elkhorn: Evolution of a Kentucky Landscape for lovers of Kentucky history, and for all those who seek topophilia in their daily lives. 

Why Dylan Marron reads YouTube comments – and finds humanity

The Rambler is partnering with the Transy Creative Intelligence lecture series this year to bring you advance interviews with speakers. Dylan Marron will speak to students in Carrick Theater at 7:30 on October 8. 

Dylan Marron is the author of the podcast “Conversations with People Who Hate Me,” which he describes as “an experiment, to see what happens when two people with very different views of the world listen to each other.” He is also a voice actor playing Carlos on the podcast “Welcome to Night Vale,” and an advocate for issues of social justice as a video maker. His Tumblr blog and video series Every Single Word, and his interview series “Sitting in Bathrooms with Trans People” have gone viral online. He recently gave a TED talk on turning negative online comments into positive offline conversations.

I recorded a conversation with Dylan before his appearance on campus. Listen to the full interview here.

Editor’s Letter: We’re selling advertisements, and here’s what that means.

Hi folks.

Here at The Rambler, we always want to be as transparent with our readers as it’s possible to be. Because of that commitment, I wanted to explain a big change that has happened, and is going to continue to happen, on the site. You may have noticed that there are a few ads appearing on our sidebars, and at the ends of our stories.

That’s because we’re starting to sell ads on our site. The revenues from these ads will allow us to expand our coverage, while still paying for all our expenses-including a fully paid student staff.

However, in the interest of transparency, I want take some time to explain exactly how that process works here at The Rambler, and to make some commitments to you, our readers.

First off, I want to clarify how ads are negotiated. While Rambler staff actively solicit ads from some businesses, a significant portion of our ad revenue comes from businesses which have approached us and want to reach you, our readers, with their message. All of our rates are mutually agreed on, and invoices are managed through the Transylvania University Accounting Office, where the revenue is incorporated into our general budget. In other words, we’re not raising funds for the University, and we’re not pocketing the money for ourselves-all our ad revenue goes towards improving The Rambler.

Second, we don’t allow advertising to interfere with our reporting; our advertising policies are governed by the same ethical standards that guide everything we do here at The Rambler. We do not, and will not, trade coverage for advertising revenue. We do not, and will not, consider the impact our reporting may have on our advertising revenue when we are shaping our coverage of the Transy & Lexington communities. We do not, and will not, offer differential or disparate consideration of ads by ideology, business, race, class, or other disposition of any advertisers. In short, to the fullest possible extent, we promise that there is a firm wall between the side of The Rambler that manages the advertising business decisions and the side of The Rambler that manages the reporting. That wall remains at the core of everything we do.

Third, I want to make clear that the ads which appear on our site are the products of the businesses, groups, and individuals that buy ad space; we’re not offering endorsements or sponsorships. For example, as the end of election season approaches, you might see ads from various political campaigns, both Democratic and Republican. That doesn’t mean that we’ve endorsed any candidate, party, or platform. If we ever do offer an endorsement, it will be in an editorial written by the entire Editorial Board, and it will be governed by the same strict standards regarding conflicts of interest and ethical conduct that we maintain in all our reporting. And if there comes a day where there is sponsored content on our site, that content will be clearly marked as such, and you as the reader will be able to choose whether or not to engage with it.

Fourth, I promise you that this site will remain a pleasant and fun experience for readers. There won’t be any pop-up videos, there won’t be any autoplaying audio, and there won’t be any full-screen splashes that make you wonder if you clicked a malicious link by accident. Our ads will remain unobtrusive, and our priority remains making sure that you can find our stories and enjoy them easily.

These ads are a part of a larger strategy which will unfold over this year, to make The Rambler into your indispensable guide to the Transy community. I’ll be sure to keep you updated on all the new and exciting changes coming down the track, and I hope you’ll be as excited about them as I am.

Tristan Reynolds is The Rambler’s Editor-in-Chief.

Further Reading: Why double-majors might beat you out of a job

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The original article was written by Matthew J. Mayhew, William Ray and Marie Adamson Flesher Professor of Educational Administration, The Ohio State University and Benjamin S. Selznick, Assistant Professor, James Madison University. 


Two college majors are better than one. That is the conclusion that researchers are beginning to reach.

Prior research has already shown that students who double major can earn more than peers who majored in only one field.

New research we conducted recently shows that double majors fare better in another way as well: They are more innovative.

We are education researchers with an interest in how the college experience develops students. What we found in our newly-published study is that students who double majored scored 17.4 percentile points higher on our overall innovation measure than the average student. The innovation advantage for double majors is almost three times higher than any other major, including business, engineering and math/statistics.

This finding held even after we controlled for a number of variables, including a family history of entrepreneurship, courses taken in college, race, gender and GPA. We even controlled for personality traits, such as being an extrovert and being open to new experiences. We also considered the institution students attended, the quality of teaching to which they were exposed and the nature of their interactions with faculty members.

So what does it mean to be more innovative and why does it matter?

What makes a person innovative

For our study, we sought to measure students’ innovation capacities. We did so using a relatively new survey instrument that enabled us to determine how institutions can help students develop their innovation capacities. These capacities include skills related to networking, persuasive communication, working on diverse teams, and risk taking.

Why majors don’t matter.

These innovative qualities matter in the job market. That’s because employers want more from college graduates than good grades. What employers really want – according to a recent survey – are graduates who can effectively work in diverse teams, are creative thinkers and have persuasive communication skills. In short, employers want innovators.

Since innovators are in demand, it begs the question: Are graduates who double-majored more innovative because they double-majored? Or did they double-major because they were already more innovative?

Self-selection could be at play. To be sure, one aspect of the connection between innovation and double-majoring is related to the fact that certain students want more than any one discipline or major can provide. They want to choose, or perhaps not choose.

It’s unclear if students double major because they are innovative, or if doing so makes them more innovative. (Nerthuz/shutterstock.com)

A desire for more

Perhaps double majors are the kind of students who need more than many programs offer. It could be a signal of proactive and creative choice for students who don’t fit the mold in terms of how higher education is currently delivered.

Double-majoring might also provide students with experiences in which students see connections between content in different courses. Additionally, taking classes required for two majors might increase networking with peers across disciplines.

Does this mean that all students should double-major and employers should only hire these graduates? Probably not.

While certainly our data demonstrate that double-majors are the most innovative, we do not conclude that this academic pathway is always the best choice for students or industries. What we do suggest, however, is that colleges and universities help students find ways to integrate material across disciplines, interact with each other across majors, and work on teams to solve real-world problems. This could be done through existing courses or perhaps new centers and spaces dedicated to innovation on college campuses.

That way, even if students don’t double-major, they might still become more innovative – and more attractive to employers.

Weather

Lexington
clear sky
59.1 ° F
59.1 °
58.6 °
45 %
1.8mph
0 %
Tue
66 °
Wed
57 °
Thu
59 °
Fri
59 °
Sat
48 °