On Wednesday night, members of the Transy community gathered together in Third Street Stuff and Coffee to honor slaves sold at Cheapside Park. Although perhaps not known to many, Cheapside was a large marketplace where various commodities were traded and sold, which included many enslaved people.
The event, hosted by the Transy class “Community Engagement through the Arts,” was titled “Flowers of Remembrance.” The attendees cut out flowers from plastic bottles, colored the petals using markers, and smoothed the plastic using the flames of candles.

Professors Kremena Todorova and Kurt Gohde have taught the class for the past ten years together. They have been working with three local elementary schools for the past few years so were looking for a project that children could easily participate in. Two of the schools are involved with a recycling program, which is where the idea to use plastic bottles came from.
The flowers are not only to honor those enslaved and sold, but to also shed light on history that many may not know.
As Todorova explains, the event was “also a final, tangible way to mark their lives because we feel that it’s a part of our history that a lot of people are not aware of. So we wanted to bring it to light and honor them.”
Those in attendance included Transy students and faculty as well as alumnus and members of the Lexington community. The students were all drawn to the event for various reasons.
For some attendees, the event was just something creative and fun.
As first-year Bailey DeLong describes, “I’m mostly just here because I enjoy it a lot.”
First-year Kristen Glass wanted to attend because of her past experience with Todorova and Gohde.

“I really like the Unlearn Fear and Hate events and I wanted to support Kurt and Kremena. They always do really fun things,” said Glass. She also pointed out that making the flowers was a nice way to destress amidst studying for a Calculus exam.
While some students were there to support Todorova and Godhe, others were there to support friends.
“I came to this event because a bunch of my friends were in the class that put it on,” said sophomore Kat Farr.
Students from the actual class took part in the event as well. First-year Marissa Price is currently taking the course and noted the importance of such an event.
“I think it’s important to get the community together and just get other people involved with the project so people become more aware of the history of Lexington,” said Price. “I think there’s an element to history where we forget that it happened right where we live and on the ground we walk on, so it’s interesting to take something that happened in the past and make people who live here now more aware of it. Plus making art together to form a memorial is a great way to unify the community.”
The flowers are planned to be strung together in some fashion as a larger art piece. The piece will be revealed in an installation ceremony at the Lyric Theatre sometime in April. According to Todorova, the installation ceremony will probably be accompanied by performance of poetry and music surrounding the themes of Cheapside, history, and black empowerment.
Todorova explained the importance of working with the Lyric Theater on this project.
“We’re excited to work with them because they are the major African-American cultural center in town,” said Todorova.
Does Transy need a stronger math and science curriculum?
As the time to select fall classes draws closer, students will once again look at their degree audits and try to figure out how to fulfill all of their degree requirements, including their General Education requirements (GE’s). Transy has a broad GE curriculum, thanks to the pursuit of a liberal arts education, but some argue that the way Transy has built this broad system does not do justice to certain fields of study. This column will examine whether Transy GE’s should include a stronger math and science section.
As the GE requirements for math and science currently stand, a student is only required to take one math course and one science course during their entire career at Transy. While students have an opportunity to use math and science classes as Area IV requirements, it’s only rarely that students outside the math and science fields choose to use math and science courses to actually fulfill their Area IV requirements. It’s also true that many students come to Transy with AP math and science classes, and this lets them avoid ever stepping foot in BSC. Such a minimal math and science requirement does not seem to conform with the ideal of a liberal arts education. Taking a single class in the fields does not allow students to gain an appreciation for the skills of that discipline, and one class is not a nearly comprehensive enough representation of the disciplines that we expect from the liberal arts.
However, this argument— that one class does not adequately represent an entire discipline or expose students to enough skills within a field— can be made for every section of the GE requirements. Taking a single Humanities, Fine Arts, or Social Science class does not make you an expert within one of those disciplines any more than taking a single math or science class does. Many students just happen to take more of these classes because they use them to fulfill their Areas IV and V. Those same opportunities exist in the math and science fields; students just choose not to take them because of the skill base that is required. That’s not something that Transy can control. Additionally, changing the number of math or science courses required would probably force a similar expansion in the other GE requirements, and students simply do not have room for that many classes.
The larger issue that’s at stake is whether our current GE system is viable. This debate over math and science GE’s represents a microcosm of the larger issues regarding the GE system and the potential changes people want to make. Though this column has merely explored the issue, rather than advocating for one side, students need to consider how they feel about the current GE system—would you keep or change our current system?
This discussion illuminates the broader point that the GE system is designed to foster the spirit of liberal arts education, yet may be failing students on that point. The good news is that there is currently a review of the GE system happening to address any issues with the current curriculum. So, if you get asked your opinions on the GE system, please give your honest opinion. Maybe you think the current system perfectly exposes you to various disciplines, or maybe you think the GE’s do not really encapsulate the liberal arts. You might not even be sure what the goals of the GE system are currently. Regardless of your opinion, be honest and constructive when considering how Transy can better improve our current system of GE’s so that we can produce effective change for the entire system, not just one segment, like math and science.