Friday, April 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 43

McGrath and Barr in statistical tie in last pre-election poll

Amy McGrath and Andy Barr are in a statistical tie in their race for the Kentucky 6th Congressional District House seat, a new poll from The Upshot-Siena finds. The poll, which was conducted over the past several days, is likely to be the last snapshot we get of the state of the race before voting begins tomorrow morning.

The poll has McGrath and Barr tied at 44% of the vote each. But with 10% of the electorate undecided and with a 4.9% margin of error, those percentages are almost certainly not going to be reflected in the final vote tally.

This poll carries a large degree of uncertainty. The pollsters spoke to only 438 people, so they had to make a large number of statistical adjustments to more closely reflect the expected demographic composition of the voters on Election Day. These adjustments, called “weighting,” mean that the actual electorate could look quite different than the sample polled. This is especially true for the 6th District, which is composed of 19 counties, since most of the calls made were to the Lexington area.

The large number of self-reported undecided voters is another possible source of ‘error’ in the poll. If most of those undecided voters break in the same direction, the result of the election could look very lopsided compared to the results of this poll.

When looking at a poll like this one, it’s best to put it into a wider context. For example, Nate Silver’s fivethirtyeight.com has rated the 6th District race as one that Leans Republican. But most other expert agencies, like the Cook Political Report and the Center for Politics, rate the race as a tossup, which puts this Upshot-Siena poll well in line with the conventional wisdom.

In both of the past two Presidential elections, the 6th District has voted for the Republican candidate by double digits, and Barr won his seat by 22% of the vote when he ran for a third term in 2016. However, there are more registered Democratic voters than Republican voters, so the demographic data likewise points to a mix of conflicting factors that could all prove influential tomorrow.


Polls will be open from 6:00 AM until 6:00 PM on November 6.

Here’s how to vote if you live in Lexington

Election Day is just around the corner, and it’s important that everyone knows what to do. Although this round of voting will not determine the President, this race is still very important and everyone able should cast their votes. If you are voting for the first time, or even if you have already voted before, it can be a bit confusing.

First things first, read a voter guide or go to this aggregator to access candidates’ websites and positions on a variety of issues. It may seem complicated to decide whom to vote for, but a little reading makes it simple.

After that, you should figure out where your polling place is. Everyone in Kentucky has a set polling place – find yours here.

CivicLex has partnered with LexTran and Spin Bikes to make sure that everyone is able to get to their voting stations. LexTran will be free, and Spin Bikes will cost only two dollars if you use the code “SPINTOTHEPOLLS.”

In Kentucky, if a voter shows up to their polling place without a state-approved ID they will have to sign an oath that they meet all of the qualifications to vote. However, poll workers prefer that everyone brings their identification. A photo is not required – a Social Security card or credit card are considered valid forms of ID.

After that, the process is simple. Just vote for whoever you think will do the best at the job they are running for. Then wait a while, and sit on the edge of your seat to see if your vote helped your candidate win.

No matter what, your vote counts! So get to the polls on November 6th, then wear your “I voted” sticker proudly.

Polls will be open from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM.

A former KET anchor is teaching a class at Transy next semester. Here’s why you should take it.

Bill Goodman, the erstwhile host of the KET programs “Kentucky Tonight” and “One to One with Bill Goodman,” will be teaching a course on media literacy this Winter Term.

The course is listed as WRC-2294, “ST: Media Literacy & Journalism,” and can be used to fulfill Writing, Rhetoric, and Communication (WRC) major or minor requirements, or as an Area IV course in the humanities division.

Goodman worked as a television journalist for KET for over 20 years, and has previously taught courses at Centre College and the University of Kentucky. He is currently the Executive Director of the Kentucky Humanities Council, and holds a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from Spalding University.

Read Safe Views, our new series on campus safety

Safe Views is a Rambler Commentary Series that explores student perspectives about safety on Transy’s campus. You can read the whole series at the links below.


Read the Series Introduction by Editor-in-Chief Tristan Reynolds

Read Guest Columns by Transy students:

Diaka Savane on being safe and feeling safe

Alexa Valarezo on microaggressions

Annie Stauffer on mental & emotional dangers

Access the open student survey here.

Series Introduction: Safe Views

The Rambler’s Commentary Section has traditionally been the place where students can make their voices heard, and where the rest of campus will listen to them. With that role in mind, Managing Editor Taylor Mahlinger and I, as Editor-in-Chief, commissioned a series of guest columns focused on the ways that Transy students think about safety on campus. We wanted to hear how students felt, how they processed those feelings, and how they made sense of the ways that Transy, as an institution, thinks about their safety. We’re calling this series Safe Views, a title which both reflects the subject matter, and comments on the ways that a press should function as the protector of uncomfortable but necessary discussions.

We wanted to ask students a seemingly simple question.

Do you feel safe at Transy?

We went about investigating that question in two ways. The first part, and the core of this series, is a set of guest columns from particularly thoughtful student writers, where each of them respond at length to the question that we posed. You can read each of those guest columns on our site, and links to all of them can be found here.

The second thing that we did was create a short survey, which you can still access here, to provide every student with the chance to make their voice heard. While we won’t be publishing the raw data responses to that survey, we do want to provide a summary view. That’s what this column is for.

One of the major recurring themes that we’ve found throughout the series is the way that students interact with campus, and with the idea of safety, through the lenses of race, gender, and background. As one survey respondent put it:

“I’m very white, very male, and pretty naïve, so there aren’t many places I don’t feel safe”

On the other hand, some students don’t feel quite so privileged:

“[T]here are very few places where I am comfortable to be myself and I cannot use the restroom in many of the academic buildings. My gender and identities are not respected in any place and I am not comfortable telling people who I am”

These considerations also run through our guest columns. Sophomore Alexa Valarezo and junior Diaka Savane write about the ways in which their racial identities dominate the ways that they are perceived on campus, and how that prevents them from feeling safe to be themselves much of the time.

This series is the start of a public conversation. I hope that it’s a conversation that centers student voices. As this series makes clear, students at Transy have a lot to say, and they’re more than willing to have these difficult but valuable conversations.

Safe Views: Diaka Savane on being safe and feeling safe

This guest column is a part of our Safe Views series, where Transy students share their views on how they feel safe, and unsafe, on Transy’s campus. Student writers responded to the question, “Do you feel safe on Transy’s campus?” and they approached that question from a variety of perspectives and viewpoints. This guest column is written by junior Diaka Savane.


Being safe and feeling safe are different things. Being safe refers to, in my opinion, the state of being in a position that will not cause harm, injury or loss. I believe this refers to the state of being physically safe. Feeling safe on the other hand must be intrinsically evaluated by an individual. Does this person feel protected, cared for, secure?

Being a student at Transylvania University, if someone outside of the community were to ask me if I felt safe, I would promptly respond with a confident ‘yes,’ since, prior to being asked to write this article, I had never considered, nor evaluated, why I felt safe on this campus mentally and emotionally. This is not to say that my hypothetical affirmative statement isn’t true, but it is worth delving deeper into the complex concept of being and feeling “safe.”

In this column I will attempt to respond to the question “Do you feel safe at Transy?”  When I think of ‘safety’ and ‘Transy’ I automatically think about the Department of Public Safety. Do I feel physically safe? Yes. I do not, however, trust that the department has my safety in mind outside of the physical. As a student of color on campus, and considering the current social climate of the United States, I cannot say that I have a high level of confidence in the department as a whole. Why might that be? First, I believe that certain DPS officers are tokenizing new officers which include two people of color, a member of the LGBTQIA+ community, and a self identifying female. Don’t get me wrong, a diverse work environment is an attribute to be proud of, but simply stating that it is doesn’t mean the job is done. When everyone begins to feel a level of safety that encompasses physical, mental and emotional, regardless of their background, that is what I call progress.

I personally have had more unsettling encounters with DPS than encouraging ones. One example is when, prior to a scheduled meeting with an officer, I was confused with another student of color even though this officer claims to want to get to know every student on campus. The very purpose of the meeting was to address the issue of grouping the neighborhoods and communities that live past Fourth Street together and generalizing the intentions of people living in this area of Lexington, predominantly African Americans, Africans and black people. Isn’t Transy supposed to be about community engagement, outreach and broadening our understandings of people who are ‘different’ from us?

Moreover, tokenization, micro and macro aggressions are not absent from this campus. Let me list a few examples for the readers who may not be aware. Have you seen a disproportionate amount of photos of people of color on brochures, the website and other promotional material for Transy? That is tokenism; or the sensationalization of people to the institution’s benefit. When I have been asked to participate in a photoshoot, be a part of a video, get put on a committee, or asked to write an article for the Rambler without having any particular association with the specific task, besides being a student on campus, it is because I am not white. The line between micro and macro aggression is blurred in these examples but nevertheless present.

How does this relate to safety? Studies have shown that microaggressions–also referred to as microassaults, microinsults and microinvalidations — can have an adverse effect on the psyche of the targeted individual. I, for example, have never been so aware of the color of my skin as I am at Transy. It’s a damn shame, but it has allowed me to grow and educate myself about social injustices.

Transy, being a liberal arts institution, means engaging in conversation about concepts, topics and theories uncomfortable and unfamiliar to our beliefs, backgrounds and varying levels of understanding both inside and outside of the classroom. Thanks to a conversation I had this past weekend I was able to realize something I had never articulated before; the fact that I am disconcerted by the unwillingness or lack of awareness of a large population of this campus to engage in conversation with people whose views differ from our own. I would like to admit my fault in this. Although I am fascinated by conversations about social issues, I tend to focus on the understanding that I predetermine to be ‘correct.’ I would argue, however, that being uncomfortable is one way we are able to grow. Embracing the challenge it is to confront or to be confronted by difficult subjects or simply differing views promotes understanding; and if not understanding, at least awareness…

This is all to say that I do not feel emotionally or mentally safe at Transy when I witness this blatant reluctance to engage in conversation or lack of awareness about the experiences of others. There is a limit to engaging in conversation, however, and that is physical safety. If someone is threatening to cause harm or is disrespecting civil dialogue, it is no longer worth your energy.

I realize that the fear of engagement as well as the realization that it is incredibly easy to shelter oneself from undesirable realities is powerful; but, perpetuating this tendency means being complacent with the status quo, leaving students, like myself, feeling uncomfortable, out of place and unsafe on college campuses.

Safe Views: Annie Stauffer on mental & emotional dangers

This guest column is a part of our Safe Views series, where Transy students share their views on how they feel safe, and unsafe, on Transy’s campus. Student writers responded to the question, “Do you feel safe on Transy’s campus?” and they approached that question from a variety of perspectives and viewpoints. This guest column is written by first-year Annie Stauffer. (Disclosure: Ms. Stauffer also writes for The Rambler as a staff contributor). 


Safety on college campuses is something every student wants, but often doubts is realistic. For most students, it is their first time living on their own. Moving away from home and being placed into a new setting can make one feel anxious and scared. These emotions are heightened because of the risks of danger so commonly seen taking place on college campuses across the country. However, Transy offers something very unique in the way of safety–a tight-knit community where everyone knows everyone. With this community oriented environment, Transy creates a more comforting approach to on-campus safety and slightly diminishes the stereotypical college experience.

Safety on college campuses, especially for women, is a very large concern. Statistics say that one in five women are sexually assaulted on college campuses. This ratio is quite disturbing and leaves many women feeling on edge just walking to classes or walking to their cars. In a way, it strips people of their independence, which is highly unjust. Since Transy is a smaller university, there is a better chance of knowing the person that is walking behind you or living across the hall from you. Although I believe this level of comfort contributes to Transy’s safety, I do not believe it fixes the looming problem of feeling unsafe. This trusting, comfortable environment Transy provides makes it tempting to not pay attention to your surroundings and to get stuck in a dangerous situation you never dreamed you would be in.

Along with physical danger being a concern, there is also emotional endangerment that appears on college campuses. Being surrounded by your peers twenty-four/seven can be exhausting, especially for introverted people. It can also narrow your scope and shape your mind into processing thought in only one way–the process all your peers have. Smaller campuses often create an atmosphere so united that people get stuck in the status-quo even if it goes against their beliefs or wants. This can cause severe emotional damage and loss of identity. Transy’s academics offer the platform for a variety of students to share their differing opinions on important topics in the world. However, does this approach and encouragement of diversity spread itself throughout student’s social interactions on campus as well?

Mental danger is a growing concern on campuses too. Being bogged down with homework assignments involving presentations, essays, worksheets, and assigned readings along with extracurricular activities, having a healthy social life, and going through the difficulties of living on your own for the first time is a lot for one person to handle. This amount of stress does not give students a fair shot to succeed highly in each realm. When you have a single toe dipped in each of these categories, the likelihood of being extraordinary in each one is very slim. This creates the mindset in many students that they are failing when they are simply human beings trying to do the best they can.

Transy does create a unified on-campus experience that allows students to feel a bit safer in a culture where danger on collegiate campuses is a normal fear. However, this unity does not cancel out the stifling fact that many students feel they are in physical, emotional, and mental danger on college campuses. Transy does its best to provide a safe, comforting environment for all students, but it is still a university that is prone to these dangers just like any other campus. Although I consider Transy my new home filled with many people I care about, I cannot help but to still feel this quiet sense of worry I must carry around with me everyday because I am on a college campus.

Safe Views: Alexa Valarezo on microaggressions

This guest column is a part of our Safe Views series, where Transy students share their views on how they feel safe, and unsafe, on Transy’s campus. Student writers responded to the question, “Do you feel safe on Transy’s campus?” and they approached that question from a variety of perspectives and viewpoints. This guest column is written by sophomore Alexa Valarezo. 


It’s my sophomore year here, and I can’t really tell you that I feel safe here. Maybe I’m in the wrong. Yes, we have a new crosswalk and signs up on how to conquer it, but me not getting hit by a car doesn’t take into account the emotional weight that comes with being at Transy. The world around us is full of violence and hatred and we may be in the Transy bubble, but this bubble is full of pain. I want to be very clear, however, that there is a lot of good here and a lot of bad that isn’t malicious.

I am a Latina woman. The way in which I interact on Transy’s campus is through my identity, and before Transy I never realized how alone I felt. Yesterday, while I was at a diversity and inclusion training focused around microaggressions, I thought of all the things I’d experienced in life that weren’t meant to be aggressive and damaging, but were. A lot of those things happened before life at Transy, but one of the worst happened here. One that was detrimental to the enjoyment of my first year here, one that changed my comfort on campus, one that I won’t ever forget.

It was during Taste of Lexington my freshman year and there was a taco truck outside the campus center, and, as most people are, I was on the hunt for the best tacos in Lexington. The man taking my order had been speaking Spanish to the cook behind him, so I decided to speak to him in Spanish. I rarely get the opportunity to speak in Spanish, because I live away from my family. The second I turned around to get some beignets from the doodles truck another member of my graduating class who I was friends with spoke at me, “Gosh, speak some English would ya.” I’d be lying if I said that I felt hurt at the time, because I didn’t. I was furious, and yet I said nothing and brushed it off. I didn’t officially report. It did end up turning into a disciplinary case because of mandatory reporting, but I sat through the whole case hearing my own character get slaughtered for what felt like eternity. The consequences for the perpetrator was attending some type of specific class/training, and I was to receive no contact.

I’m not really sure what kind of consequences this person deserved, but I know that nothing would have felt like enough. It changed my habits on campus. Even now, I still feel slightly uncomfortable speaking in Spanish around campus. The dust has settled, but I definitely haven’t fully healed. I don’t really know if I ever will. Because of that experience I can’t say I feel safe on campus, because the feelings I have towards it now are just pain because in trying to express myself I was demeaned. Safety, is the privilege to be yourself. I don’t feel like I’ve been able to do that here.

I hope that with the many efforts around campus to improve diversity and inclusion that these feelings will have gone away. To some extent they have. What people need to realize is that it isn’t just what is said to your face that creates these feelings of marginalization, but it’s the seemingly positive comments, the microaggressions, the looks or stares, and even the ‘innocent’ questions. It’s the resentment and pain of not having agency to speak up or feeling like no one is listening to your experience that contributes to not feeling safe here.

Here’s This Thing: Bob Roberts

Bob Roberts isn’t interested in debating you. The film, a vicious satire of the aw-shucks, just-like-you conservative movement of the 1980’s to the early 2000’s, marks out a clear target early and often. It tells you that the bad guys are the politicians who pretend to be simple folks from the heartland, but who are actually financiers whose oligarchical class loyalty supersedes any cultural affiliation they perform for voters. It paints a picture of a conservative movement in thrall to a shadowy donor class and a menacing series of war criminals and imperial schemers. It’s a cartoonish, over-the-top portrait of a political movement utterly devoid of any sort of morality or sense of responsibility. Bob Roberts, as a film, sits somewhere between biting satire and furious polemical, borne out of an ardently sincere leftism.

Naturally, it was mostly ignored or panned when it came out. The film was like something out of a parody of late-period Spike Lee, too ridiculous to even comment on reality. Sure, politicians like George Bush lied, but so do all politicians. Cheney seemed like a creepy guy, but he was more or less a solid Vice President, right? It was the paranoid hippies, the ones scared of “The Man” just mouthing off again.

But now we know that the film was far more accurate than parodic. Bob Roberts is a film for the age of Trump, and for a GOP more devoted to white nationalism than any sense of personal or political responsibility. When the Republican-controlled Congress has passed a massive tax cut for the oligarch class while trying to cut welfare payments, and when new foreign adventurism is more popular than responsibly ending the decades-long imperial wars in which the US is already engaged, a satire that is clear about the emptiness at the heart of conservatism reads more like prophecy than parody.

Still, when most of us look back on popular culture of the past few decades, we tend to overlook films like Bob Roberts—the mainstream consensus of the time has ossified around these films as forgettable products of the leftist fringe. Michael Moore, shrill propagandist though he might be, has proven a more insightful prognosticator than the entire CNN lineup of pundits, who thought that the GOP would act responsibly in 2016… and 2017, and 2018. And Bob Roberts, with a title character who arguably fakes his own assassination attempt, had a better sense of the importance of the grift to the conservative project than ‘serious’ commentators like Bill Kristol.

This has been true for decades—the hippies who called Nixon a traitor have been proven to be nearer to the mark than the responsible broadcasters like Cronkite or Murrow were willing to admit. (Nixon, of course, sabotaged the 1968 US-North Vietnam peace talks to improve his election chances.) Reagan’s administration sold arms to Iran and funded the Contras in Nicaragua (the colonel who went to jail as a consequence of the investigation into the Iran-Contra affair, Oliver North, is currently the head of the NRA). Bob Roberts is a film that’s clear-eyed about these issues—Alan Rickman plays a character who’s halfway between North and Cheney.

Somehow, though, the fact that the hippie fringe has historically been more clear-eyed about the nature of the conservative movement hasn’t penetrated much of the mainstream discourse. That should change, especially as the current government—not just Trump—makes it clear that Bob Roberts has a better grasp of the right than Brian Williams or Chuck Todd has ever demonstrated.

Profile: Regan MacNay, Director of Choral Programs

Transylvania University has hired Dr. Regan MacNay as an Assistant Professor of Music and Choral Director.

Because she had lived in Canada for the majority of her life, the idea of a liberal arts college was new to her, since these do not exist in Canada. After learning about all a “liberal arts education” entails, she was so excited to be a part of it.

At thirty-two years old, MacNay decided to change her life completely, or as she says, to “throw it into chaos.” She and her friends took a thirteen day road trip from Ontario all the way to California, where she received her Masters of Music in choral conducting from California State University. She later studied at the University of Kentucky and received her Doctor of Musical Arts in choral conducting. MacNay lived in Lexington for two years before coming to work at Transy.

Transy’s new choral instructor hard at work. Photo by Gabby Crooks

Transy has two student choirs, one coed and the other an all-women choir, both audition only. MacNay was surprised to find out that no members of either choir are music majors, but she says the groups are incredibly diverse in their majors and interests.

MacNay’s days are packed with planning for and conducting both of Transy’s choirs. Although she is busy, she enjoys every second of it. “The days are lovely, and I have great students.”

Dr. MacNay believes everyone needs a creative outlet, and she loves seeing what they do with it. “There’s nothing between us, no instruments, no computers. It’s just us, doing what we love.”

One of MacNay’s goals for her students is to expose them to every sort of musical style she can. “My job is to open up their musical experience.” One of the choirs is even working on an Estonian song, to learn how to perform in different languages and styles.

MacNay hopes that in a few years, with a lot of training and practice, the choirs will be ready to perform on a national level. She wants to show the world that “we are Transy, and this what we can do.” After every practice, she wants each student to leave happier and proud of what they can accomplish.

Transy welcomed on a new member to their faculty this year. Photo by Gabby Crooks

She also hopes to establish more singing groups on campus. She recounted how there used to be many more than the current two. MacNay would love to form an all male choir, an acapella group, and a choir sans auditions.

MacNay says she is so thankful for the support and flexibility of the choirs working with a new conductor. She talked about how hard it is to adjust to the new style of conducting and said she is so pleased by students’ response. She loves hearing their feedback and ideas. The students even helped choose the songs they are going to sing for their first performance on family weekend.

One of Dr. MacNay’s students in the mixed choir said, “she really did listen to our input, we went through our music and picked the ones we wanted to sing! She is amazing to work with, and is she is such a great person”.


The first major choral concert will be held on November 11 in the Carrick Theater.

Weather

Lexington
overcast clouds
67.3 ° F
69.1 °
66.1 °
85 %
0.8mph
100 %
Fri
70 °
Sat
71 °
Sun
62 °
Mon
53 °
Tue
47 °