Friday, May 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 2

Bus Rapid Transit: What is it, and could it fix Nicholasville Road?

0
– Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Nicholasville Road is probably Lexington’s most infuriating road to drive on. Outside of the liminal emptiness of the middle of the night, the road has bumper-to-bumper traffic for miles. Personally, I will always avoid driving it whenever possible. The last time I found myself there was when I decided to give it another shot a few months ago after avoiding it a while, but when I was stopped in traffic where Upper and Limestone split, someone hit me from behind and totaled my car. Never again.

It comes as no surprise, then, that Lexington’s urban planners want to redesign the road. In 2023, the city of Lexington published a study that seeks to reimagine the road, making it more efficient and safer for not only drivers, but also the many pedestrians and bicycle users who use the road. Because much of Nicholasville Road is owned by the Commonwealth (as US 27), Kentucky’s Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) is currently preparing its own study to make its own recommendations. As an intern for KYTC, I was able to attend a recent meeting to discuss this project. It is obvious that something has to be done to this road, especially now that UK is planning to build a new cancer center nearby, and private student housing complexes are planned along Nicholasville Road.

Adding more lanes, the usual solution to this type of situation, is completely out of the question. Many previous expansions have left buildings so close to the road that there is simply no room to add another one. Even if Lexington wanted to go through the process to buy these buildings and demolish them to make room, many of them have historical preservation laws protecting them to avoid this. As a result, the planners are looking for other methods to alleviate traffic and make the road safer. Besides, adding extra lanes to a highway does not work once you already have a road as wide as Nicholasville Road, being ridiculously expensive for a project that often only leads to marginal traffic improvements.

One of the proposals that planners in both Lexington and Frankfort are considering that I am most interested in is a potential BRT route on Nicholasville Road, the first such route in the city. BRT, short for Bus Rapid Transit, is a bus service that attempts to emulate features of light rail transportation (the modern term for street cars or trams). This usually involves fare payment at the stops rather than on the bus, buses running more often than traditional bus routes, dedicated lanes for BRT buses only, among others.

If BRT lines behave similarly to trains, then why not just use trains? Many cities, like Cincinnati, Detroit, and Phoenix, use a light rail system. As much as I love light rail (if the Cincinnati Connector has zero fans, then I’m dead), it can be quite costly and requires a lot of infrastructure and maintenance that many mid-sized cities do not have the money, time, or public interest to take on. BRT is much cheaper in comparison and much easier to construct and implement. Instead of having to lay track, you might just paint the road. BRT systems can also be used as a proof of concept for future light rail networks, although in my conversations with planners around Lexington, that doesn’t seem to be the case here, at least for now.

Although BRT is not a new concept, the first line being created in the 1970s, it has only really taken off in the United States within the last decade. If the BRT is implemented, we wouldn’t be the first in the area. Louisville has a BRT line, serving the western half of the city from downtown, along the Dixie Highway, ending just before the intersection of Dixie and Gene Snyder. The list of stops and schedule was once available on TARC (Louisville’s transit authority), but as of March 2025, the link is broken. Cincinnati is also preparing to introduce BRT to the city, with two routes by the end of next year. Both routes originate downtown, where they run concurrently, then split off in Clifton (near the University of Cincinnati campus), with one going towards the northeast of town and the other towards the northwest.

The exact details are still up in the air, and are subject to change in any step of the design process, which could take several years, but the line would most likely start in downtown, stopping at several important intersections along Nicholasville Road, eventually terminating at Man O’ War or even out to Brannon Crossing in the northern end of Jessamine County. It would likely take about as long as driving down the road, with some minor time loss for stopping and boarding, but the dedicated lane could prove helpful during rush hour, and make the bus more enticing if you’re stuck. At certain points, especially in the more suburban areas of the route, there would likely be park-and-ride lots next to the stops.

Seasonal stops might also be implemented in front of Kroger Field, to be used before and after games.

Is the BRT line going to help with traffic on Nicholasville Road? I’m hopeful it will have some effect, but I’m not going to delude myself into thinking that it will solve the traffic problem completely. Honestly, nothing could really help that trainwreck of a road unless a lot of other people realize that there are multiple other roads that will get you where you need to go in about the same time. Research has shown that increased use of public transportation does reduce traffic congestion, so making this plan work will involve convincing people to use it. As I mentioned earlier, resilience against rush hour traffic could potentially be a selling point. The park and ride lots at some stops would also make travelling to multiple destinations along Nicholasville Road more worthwhile, considering the amount of time that could be saved by not having to search for parking at each stop.

Even if it doesn’t help traffic all that much, I believe that the BRT route, with other proposals in the full study, would help make Nicholasville Road less daunting for those who dare to traverse it by bike or on foot.
Side note: If you haven’t already, you should totally subscribe to Civic Lex, a free weekly newsletter explaining whatever Lexington’s government is up to.

High Schoolers versus The Commonwealth: Interview with the Students Who Filed a Lawsuit Against Kentucky

On January 14th, 2025, the Kentucky Student Voice Team (KSVT) filed a lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Kentucky, seeking to hold the state accountable for its failure to fulfill its constitutional obligation to ensure that all students have access to an equitable and dignified educational experience. KSVT has cited numerous issues such as declining literacy skills, lack of civics education, mental health crises, limited arts availability, and severe academic disparities. KSVT is a student-led organization that is focused on amplifying student voices in education policy and practice through research, policy, and storytelling initiatives. Students in KSVT have been involved with shaping policy, leading forums, publishing podcasts and articles, writing books, working closely with other organizations, and have now officially filed a lawsuit. 

For full disclosure, I have been a member of KSVT since July of 2023, and I am currently a board member. 

It isn’t every day that a group of mostly high school students is involved in this sort of litigation, so I interviewed two of these students to understand what this lawsuit means to them. Michelle Zheng is a senior at Elizabethtown High School, and Abigail Ladwig is a junior at Owensboro High School.

So first, tell me a little bit about yourself. Who are you as a student, and what are you involved in?

Michelle: That’s a loaded question. I’m pretty involved in high school, and I do want to add that I am an AP honor student. I’ve taken almost all the AP classes my school offers, and if not, then I’m in honors classes. Outside of school, I do a lot of extracurriculars. I am in FBLA (Future Business Leaders of America), I am in Beta Club, I co-founded the Environmental Club, and I co-founded the Young Democrats. I’m a part of KSVT, where I primarily focus on research and journalism. In my community, I do Teen Corps, which is a youth program for juvenile offenders. We, the volunteers, will go in and we will prosecute or defend juvenile offenders. And then there will be a kind of peer court and jury. Essentially, they will come up with a sentence for the offender, for them to try to rehabilitate themselves and rectify whatever offense they committed.  

Abigail: As a student, I’d say I’m pretty high achieving. You know, standard, like AP classes, I’m in the orchestra, I weightlift, I run track and cross-country. Right now I’m training for a half marathon, so I’ve been working out a lot. The hobbies I enjoy are just straight-up research. Right now I’m working on research for the science fair at the University of Louisville. My project is on chickens and how carotenoid supplements change their egg yolks. I love STEM, and I hope to pursue a career in environmental science or animal sciences. Beyond that, a lot of my extracurriculars focus more on policy and law, because that’s what’s available to me. I am obviously on KSVT but I’m also part of the Wendell Ford Government Education Center, where we learn about our local government and ways to improve it. I’m on the debate team, and the Future Problem Solving team at my school. I was a campus representative for Project Green Challenge in 2024, which is kind of like youth advocacy, but for graduate students, where we respond to prompts like environmental awareness and try to get information out to the public about how they can be more sustainable. I’m a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Steward, and I’m trying to work on a community project, where I try to help marine environments because Owensboro, where I go to school, is right on the Ohio River. And it’s a very polluted river, it’s not the worst, but it’s very polluted. I would not go swimming in it. A project that I’m trying to get started on is environmental education within elementary schools. My mom’s a public school teacher, and I hope to be able to utilize that connection to try to teach younger children to be aware that their actions have consequences on the environment. I’m probably forgetting about a lot of other stuff because I do a lot, but I promise I balance it!

Why did you join KSVT and what is your role within it right now? 

Michelle:  I joined KSVT because I was trying to get involved in statewide politics. KSVT is an organization that reaches out to students, and its main priority is elevating marginalized student voices across Kentucky. I remember writing my application for KSVT, and I wrote in there how I’m one of the five or six Asian American students at my school and how I didn’t necessarily feel included both inside and outside the classroom and social settings. That was what compelled me to do advocacy in education. You’ll find that there are echoes of that in my complaint for KSVT v The Commonwealth of Kentucky. In regards to research, I’m on the National Urban Leagues Student Advisory Council for Accountability and Assessment, and a couple of weeks ago, I went to New York City for a convening to essentially try to revamp or reimagine what standardized testing looks like. Moving towards project-based learning, Capstone projects, and theses because we’re finding that standardized testing isn’t equitable, especially in minority communities.

Abigail: I joined in December 2023, which honestly isn’t that long, but the way the Kentucky Student Voice Team is structured, you can move up and take a stronger role in some of these projects quickly, which is awesome. I joined because I felt like I wasn’t doing enough in my community. You know, seeing everything that’s going on in this world right now is just really heartbreaking, and I felt like I wasn’t doing enough. I would go home, study for my AP class, play the violin a little bit, and go run. But I felt like I wasn’t doing anything with my life. There was nothing that I could say I was doing, and it’s great to compete at stuff, to get medals, to run a race hard, or to compete, you know, for future problem-solving. That’s amazing, but it wasn’t satisfying. There was a hole in me that wasn’t being satisfied. And I heard about the Kentucky Student Voice team from a fellow student. And I decided, you know, might as well sign up and see where it can take me, and it’s taken me to a lawsuit. 

How have your experiences as a student in Kentucky shaped your views on education and the education system in general? 

Michelle: As a student in Kentucky, I did the Governor’s Scholars Program (GSP), and after meeting people from all these different types of schools, I found that maybe my school’s not doing what it’s supposed to be doing. My school is definitely doing its best, but in comparison to other students across the state, we’re not matching the quality of curriculum of these other schools, like DuPont Manual for example. There needs to be a little bit of a change in that sector. I have friends from, Somerset and Russell Springs whose schools are way more rural than my district is. And I found that, those students had no AP classes at all and no resources for standardized tests like the ACT. That has really made me realize that there are inequities in our system and those need to be addressed. 

Abigail: I love my school, don’t get me wrong, we’re a pretty awesome school. There are teachers who work hard, we have staff who care. You know, I once cried in my Dean of Instruction’s arms over something that happened, and I felt safe. We have police officers who keep us safe. The staff connects with students and tries to make everyone feel welcome. And so, at first, I didn’t think there was a huge issue with the education system in Kentucky. But as I got to high school, I realized that there was a really big disparity between me and other students. That has kind of shaped how I view things. I don’t want to say that the Kentucky public education system is a letdown, but why is someone from a different school seeming to have more opportunities than me? Seeing that has shaped how I view the education system, and just seeing how other students fare in their classes. I’ve sat in on general classes before, not AP, and I’ve seen just how the lessons are completely formatted differently. I get it that it’s not an AP class, but it was to the extent that I was like, what the heck? You’re not teaching anything. And I don’t blame it on the teacher; again, that’s the curriculum that they’re supposed to teach. Just seeing that firsthand as a student helped me realize that. And then, through the Kentucky Student Voice Team, actually being told to my face, this is what’s happening, and being able to relate those things that are happening in my school. KSVT has helped me realize that we have some stuff that we need to fix. 

What do you hope to achieve by being a part of this lawsuit and what does it mean to you personally?

Michelle: I really want to, for the most part, highlight minority voices in Kentucky because in my experience as a student, microaggressions are rampant at my school. Like in many other rural school districts, a lot of minority students have to deal with comments they receive from their peers or the school environment. Administrators are very complacent in trying to address those issues and I understand how the administration, being predominantly white, can be sensitive to the topic. However, minority students don’t necessarily trust these administrators to take proper action if they voice concerns about microaggressions in the classroom. A microaggression is not direct racism. Oftentimes, a microaggression can manifest itself in many different ways. The perpetrator of a microaggression doesn’t necessarily have to intend to be racist. It can be just subconscious, not realizing they are being racist or making stereotypical remarks. I definitely want to open up a conversation within our state with legislators and lawmakers to destigmatize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) because it is really impacting many students, including myself. For instance, one of my close friends at my school, who is Asian American, considered self-harming because of the microaggressions he’s been through throughout school. A lot of his peers made microaggressive, rude comments to him, and that really did a number on his mental health. I really want to emphasize that. Why are we demonizing DEI when not being inclusive and having those conversations of cultural sensitivity in the class is really hurting a lot of minority students? 

Abigail: Well, first I’d like to achieve actual change. I’d like politicians to wake up and realize that the youth of today are not lazy. A lot of older generations think, “My gosh, Gen Z is so lazy. They don’t do anything.” Okay, well I’m suing you – my gosh. I want people to realize that we are developing our future regardless of what other people say. The youth of today are strong, capable, and we are making a statement for ourselves. I’d like to see this result in a bill or an amendment to Rose or KERA, because it’s just not acceptable what’s happening right now. It just feels great to see change in my community. I love going to the elementary schools and volunteering with them and I look forward to seeing how they will react when there are improvements to their school system. And when they’re looking back, and thinking “the KSVT kids allowed me to have a better and brighter future in middle school and high school”. That just makes my soul really happy. For me, that’s enough. It’s just insane that politicians in our legislative system don’t think the same way. We should be helping each other, uplifting each other, and educating our kids, not withholding funding or trying to divert funding. I hope that with this lawsuit, we can spread the word that we’re not going to be one of the lowest in education anymore. We have youth who are advocating for a better tomorrow.  

How do you see the effects of inadequate education policy playing out in students’ daily lives? 

Michelle: Right now there is a national literacy rate decline. A lot of kids aren’t learning how to read. My sister’s in the 9th grade honors class, which has a teacher. But if you aren’t in the honors class in the ninth grade, you have a teacher who logs in from Zoom to teach the class from Switzerland. I don’t think that’s adequate at all! It’s a core class, and ninth grade is when you need to build on the foundations. My school’s average ACT score is really low, and we have standardized tests, but only a quarter of students are proficient at my school. A quarter, maybe a little bit more than that, of students at my high school are proficient in English and Math. State testing is very basic information, and if kids aren’t passing that, especially for those who intend on going into college, it’s really alarming. 

Abigail: I see a lot of kids that are my race in AP courses and a lot of kids that aren’t my race in lower courses, and I think that has a lot to do with discrimination because we have it signed into law that everyone should receive an adequate education, but we’re not. I do not have a single African American classmate in my AP Calculus course. I can think of other courses that I don’t, but that one is noticeable,  there is not a single person from a different race in this class, and that speaks volumes. That shows how our education system has failed. Why are we still letting this happen to our children? Beyond that, we get a lot of refugees in our school, and people who speak different languages. I see them being discriminated against, and being made fun of and they can’t even understand what people are saying. That’s not very welcoming. I thought America was supposed to be the land of the free, but it doesn’t seem very free when we’re making fun of people who are coming here to escape the poor quality of conditions in their home country. We’re having people who are refugees, people of different races being discriminated against, a white majority in upper classes, and all those combine to allow white children to succeed. We should have a complete balance. In a perfect world, we would. With a better education system, there would be more Black children able to succeed, more biracial children able to succeed, more Hispanic kids, would be able to succeed in Kentucky’s public education. 

Imagine that you have the Kentucky State legislature all standing in front of you. What would you say to the policy makers that is the most important thing for them to understand about the student experience in Kentucky? 

Michelle: I want to say that education should be afforded to every student and every student should have a high quality of education. That’s really basic. But I’ve heard adults say that, education is a privilege, and I somewhat agree with that to some extent because my parents immigrated here and I’m the first generation to be born in the US. So in some aspects, I do believe that yes, education is a privilege. However, with the “land of the free”, we live in America, and I feel like everybody should have the opportunity to have a good education. Where my parents grew up, there was a huge wealth disparity in China and they came to the United States for economic opportunity. I fully believe that education does, to some extent, equate to success in students’ lives. Education will play a really big role in employment and success so I fully believe that all students in Kentucky should have access to a quality and good education. 

Abigail: Well, they need to understand that I’m a person. The people who are going to school with me are people. We are humans. We are not statistics, we are not numbers, we are not test scores. We are people and we deserve all the same chances. They need to do more qualitative analysis of what’s happening in schools. They need to understand that what you may see on paper is skewed because, as a researcher, you can never just look at quantitative data; you always have to look at the qualitative side as well to get a full scope of everything. It seems like their policies and the funding that they’re allowing us to have are based solely on numbers. If I were face-to-face with a politician right now, I wouldn’t say a lot. I would just say, please hear me. Just hear me, see me, and understand me. Understand what I’m saying to you because, again, I’m not just an object at a desk; I’m a person. The only way to have a strong community and better the Commonwealth of Kentucky is to treat people as people, not as a result of a bill, or ignoring minorities. They see high test scores, they see a high ratio, and they decide  “The school did really good.” But wait, we need to look at the demographics that are doing good. And it would be very important to politicians to see who’s succeeding and who’s not in those demographics. 

How has being a part of this movement towards education equity influenced you or affected you as a person and a student? 

Michelle: As a person, I’d say it’s made me feel empowered to speak on my experiences in the classroom, and not be afraid to express myself and express some of the inequities that I faced as a student. Because the first step to making any change is addressing the problem. 

Abigail: When I was younger, I used to not really care all that much about other people. Which sounds terrible, but I’d see a student struggling with a test and I’d be like, “Thank God, that’s not me.” But now, after all of this, I’m starting to realize that they’re not struggling with a test because they didn’t try; they’re struggling because the system let them down. It’s allowed me to be more compassionate, more open to other things, more understanding, and more educated. You know, if the system’s not going to educate me on civics, then I’m going to educate myself. It’s allowed me to have conversations with people who view the same things as me, and it’s allowed me to have new friends, build confidence in myself, and connect with a lot of other cultures. 

What changes do you hope to see in Kentucky’s education system as a result of this lawsuit, both short-term and long-term? What are you hoping comes out of this?

Michelle: I hope teachers get paid what they deserve. My teachers throughout high school and even middle school have complained about teacher pay. Very high-skilled teachers oftentimes will work at higher-level schools like private schools and schools like Manual rather than schools in rural districts because they get paid a little bit more. That perpetuates a cycle of inequity because you have unqualified teachers, like online teachers, teaching classes in these more rural districts, and suburban districts where their communities are a little bit more underserved. We need more funding for transportation. Like the JCPS busing crisis that happened last year. In the short term, I think infrastructure needs to be addressed first. Funding primarily, but then long-term wise I definitely do think that there needs to be some guidelines when it comes to civic education, and requiring civics classes before taking the civics exam. Making those classes a requirement and advocating for cultural sensitivity. Having adequate civics education, mental health resources, and cultural sensitivity training for staff members is important. Having resources where minority students can go to express their concerns and not be ignored by the administration, if that makes sense. We need to hone down the 7 Capacities of Rose for sure and ensure that schools are following those guidelines. That is what I want to see in Kentucky because I feel like funding is good and all, but it’s kind of like throwing spaghetti at a wall.  It might be really good, but we need to be mindful of what we are funding. 

Abigail: Well, I don’t expect there to be an increase in funding. It would be amazing to see an increase, but I really don’t expect that, especially with the policies going on with our current president. I don’t think we’re going to have any more funding in Kentucky to go around. I just hope to see more students pursuing harder things, like women in STEM, minorities in STEM, and underrepresented people in STEM. That’s what I really hope to see. I hope to see more student activists like KSVT, which is pretty small in comparison to the state. More students should be empowered to be active community members. I don’t want a curtain to be drawn over students’ eyes. I think using this and creating real change out of it would result in more students being literate in today’s global issues and being more culturally understanding. I don’t want students to feel like they can’t pursue something because of their race, gender, or how they identify, or where they’re from, or how much money they make. I want kids to all feel like they have the same exact opportunity, both in Kentucky and compared to other states. One of the things about Rose is being able to compete for college, and having a competitive resume. Right now, I don’t think Kentucky stands a huge chance. I don’t like standardized tests; I don’t think they encapsulate what a student is, but you can see a clear trend – students who are better educated usually score higher on those tests. I’d like to see us rise up, and being from Kentucky means that I have a passion to see us improve. So that’s what I hope will happen. I just want to see students who are future leaders truly excel. 

For one final question, is there anything else that I haven’t asked you about today that you would like to say?

Michelle: I would say that, again, going off the microaggressions, I do feel that it is very stigmatized in our legislation to understand what a microaggression is in the first place. I think that speaks volumes about how uneducated we are in learning about different cultures. We really need to have more of a pluralistic approach to history where we have all sorts of perspectives involved in our history classes. History classes should be very much impartial, so that students can think for themselves and formulate their own opinions. In civics classes, we need to engage in these challenging conversations because students are facing racism in our current day-to-day lives. Lack of conversation breeds ignorance among predominantly white communities. It’s really important for our classes at school and educators in the school system to truly try to enforce ways to try to combat that and dismantle that ignorance. 

Abigail: If I could speak directly to Kentucky students and educators I would say first that I’m sorry this is how it had to happen. I’m sorry that it can just be given to us, but I’d ask them to join me, to take my hand and to not be afraid to fight. After all this work with KSVT, I’m not as scared anymore. I want more people to stand up and rise up. 

Through their advocacy, research, and storytelling, students like Michelle and Abigail have made it clear that they will not stand by as their peers are denied the education they deserve. Regardless of the lawsuit’s outcome, their work has already sparked critical conversations about Kentucky’s public education system and the role students must play in shaping it. As they continue their fight for a more equitable and dignified educational experience, their voices serve as a reminder of the urgent need for education reform.

2025-26 Student Government Association Election Results Announced

0

The results of the latest Transylvania Student Government Association elections, held on Tuesday, April 1 to elect the Executive Council for the 2025-26 school year, are in. The results were sent to The Rambler shortly after being announced during the scheduled SGA meeting on Wednesday night, and have also been posted to @tu_sga on Instagram. The 2025-26 SGA Executive Council members are:

President: Sean Gannon (’26)

Vice President: Lakyn Totten (’27)

Chief of Staff: Kate Polson (’26)

Chief of Finance: Reagan Rawlins (’28)

Dining Disaster: Everything We Know About the Sigatoni’s Culinary Calamity (April Fools 2025)

0

In early February, a sequence of events in the Pioneer Rooms, colloquially known as “The Pio Rooms,” raised concerns among the Transylvania community. It all began with Transylvania’s chapter of the Delta Sigma Phi fraternity’s annual philanthropy event: Sigatoni’s. The faux-fine dining Italian experience was going as planned when students began to notice something that most reasonable students would overlook. 

In a seemingly unprecedented move, prior to opening Sigatoni’s for that year, the setup within the Pio Rooms had received a health inspection. Later, sources within Delta Sigma Phi would claim that the health inspector had received anonymous tips about possible violations even before the temporary restaurant had been set up (many would cast blame on the meddling of members of the rival Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity). While Sigatoni’s had no previous standard to compare to, patrons to the event were shocked at the failing score of 86.

While an 86 would score as a “B” on your final exam, this score is closer to a “D” in the eyes of health inspectors, and a far more realistic final exam grade for most readers. More curious was the fact that the inspection notice was blocked from view for large portions of the night by Sig members intentionally standing in front of it, who would yell incomprehensible gibberish in a mediocre Italian accent at anyone who approached the notice.

Once revealed, the health code inspection listed a multitude of violations, including Temperature Control for Safety, Food Sources, Toilet and Handwashing Facilities, and Sewage. A few non-standard additions were made to the inspection notice. In what could be interpreted as an attempt at emphasis, the box marking a failure for Good Hygienic Practice was marked down multiple times and circled with a red marker. Additionally, the boxes for Insect, Rodent & Animal Control and Personnel were both marked, and a line was drawn connecting the two. It is unclear what the health inspector was trying to communicate with this gesture.

While members of Delta Sigma Phi were quick to dismiss the score as “not a big deal,” some Sigatoni’s patrons may disagree. There have been reports that Sigatoni’s patrons who ordered the Mushroom Bolognese experienced psycho-hallucinogenic effects shortly after leaving the event (though this matter is being investigated separately). There has been at least one documented report of poisoning arising from the event, that being from the Rambler’s own Editor-in-Chief, Katie Axon.

Axon, who is still recovering from the incident, reported that she chose to dine at Sigatoni’s that evening to save a meal swipe. Axon’s waiter for that evening happened to be former Rambler Editor in Chief Jack Thomas. While some witnesses to the scene believed they saw Thomas slip something into Axon’s food, the Rambler has not confirmed these reports. All that is known is that when the health inspection notice was revealed, Thomas ran over to the notice, wrote the numbers 1 and 9 on either side of the score, and claimed that the notice was merely a reminder of the year 1869 when Delta Sigma Phi was founded (Thomas did not respond to Rambler requests for comment when he was told that Delta Sigma Phi was in fact founded in 1899). Thomas then fled the scene and has not been seen since.

When visiting the hospital after the poisoning, Axon’s doctor informed her that an abnormal number of Transy students had recently been admitted for treatment, including one who had been injured in a yet to be solved hit and run. Katie decided to share this with her peers, and replies began flooding in. The common thread? All those who had been injured in some way had “crossed’ Jack Thomas. This raises many especially alarming questions. Will Jack Thomas ever be caught? How many more untold victims of his crimes are out there? Will Transy ever again be able to have a faux-fine dining Italian experience hastily set up in a mixed-use event space? What crimes against humanity did Thomas commit at the Great Bowls of Fire event? There are many questions still left unanswered, and only time will tell what is to come of this situation.

The Rambler will continue to cover this story as necessary, and hopefully, someday, this menace to the campus community will face justice. 

Note: This is a satirical article created by The Rambler to celebrate April Fools’ Day 2025. The events described in the above article are purely fictional.

Candidates for SGA Executive Council Participate in Debate Ahead of Elections

On the afternoon of Wednesday, March 26, six days before the scheduled April 1st elections for the Student Government Association Executive Council for the 2025-26 academic year, six candidates, all running for various positions on EC, gathered in the Strickland Auditorium. All six participated in a debate and town hall hosted by The Rambler, where they made their case for why they should be voted into SGA office and fielded questions from the student body. Dozens of students made their way to Strickland to hear the pitches of various candidates and ask questions, while more watched as the entire debate and town hall was streamed live on The Rambler’s Instagram. The six candidates who participated in the debate were freshman Brayden Strong, running for Chief of Finance, freshman Delta Pirkle and junior Kate Polson, each running for Chief of Staff, sophomores Lakyn Totten and Max Hankins, each running for Vice President, and junior Sean Gannon, running for his second term as SGA President. 

Debate moderator Lyra Duffy opened the debate by asking each candidate what motivated them to run for their respective positions and what unique qualities they could bring to the role. A commonality for most of the first-time candidates was a desire to contribute more to campus and create greater change, citing leadership positions they had held previously both as evidence of this drive to encourage growth in their community and experience that would qualify them for SGa Executive Council. As Polson eloquently summarized, “I knew I wanted to give my time and attention to the meaningful work on campus. I found SGA to be the vehicle for that work.” 

Sean Gannon emphasized that he was coming from a different position, having already served one term as SGA President. Gannon highlighted the work that SGA has done this year under his leadership, and, in a theme he would revisit multiple times throughout the debate, emphasized how he had the rare opportunity to go into next year with a year’s worth of experience in pushing the administration to respond to student concerns. As Gannon put it, “This past year has been some of the most productive work we have ever seen SGA do…with the experience I have gained, I can continue to amplify this even further.” 

The debate moved along with each candidate being asked general questions ranging from serious issues, such as what the top priorities of each candidate would be, and what each candidate sees as the biggest challenge facing the student body. There were also more light-hearted questions, such as what color each candidate would choose to represent their campaign and what each candidate’s preferred SGA superhero name would be. 

A through-line of many of Strong’s responses was his desire to promote and uplift all student organizations. This was the first point he went to when asked what his top priority as Chief of Finance would be, stating, “One of my main goals, along with running daily finances, is to give these clubs the opportunity to get some of this [financial support] that we offer so they can get events going on campus.” Strong cited his club-centric experience in SGA, including two projects designed to promote student organization events and opportunities to the student body. 

Polson continually emphasized the need for SGA to maintain open lines of communication between SGA and the student body, echoing similar arguments by other candidates that a primary goal of SGA should be continuing to emphasize transparency. Polson stressed that, especially during current turbulent times, it is paramount that SGA provide a consistent level of support to students. Polson seeks to ensure this constant student support from SGA by pushing for engaged senatorship by members of SGA, primarily in the form of projects designed for that goal. Polson emphasized that she would “strive to be a resource for those projects.”

As their top priority, Pirkle emphasized creating personal relationships with the senators of SGA in order to facilitate a closer, more open, and more cooperative student government. As they stated, “I want to try and get to know the senators and be someone they can go to when they need help with projects…I just want to help.” Pirkle hopes that this plan of interconnectedness between senators would show dividends in SGA’s attempt to reach out and connect with the student body, touching on the theme of increased communication and transparency that was echoed by other candidates. 

Totten focused on what she categorized as “a disconnect between faculty and student life,” especially when it comes to the resources and support provided to students. Totten hopes to highlight existing resources for student wellness through SGA projects and events, and ti push for increased recognition and respect for student wellness, especially mental health, among faculty and staff. Totten set this lack of mental health recognition as one of the biggest challenges facing the student body, stating, “Education is why we are all here, but at the same time, you can not pause your own life and you can not pause your own health.”

One of Hankins’ primary goals for the upcoming year is to streamline positions within SGA to divide up workload among senators so as to increase collaboration and more efficiently accomplish tasks for the student body. Hankins argued that this collaboration fits well with the small and tight-knit student community of Transy, and it increases the likelihood of students coming together to create real change. As Hankins argued, “It is easy to lose sight of the power we have as students with our smaller size. I think that, both through student government and as the individuals who keep this institution running, it is important to keep that in mind and find ways to implement what we need on campus.”

Gannon unsurprisingly, was the most explicit of all the candidates for what his goals for the upcoming year would be should he be re-elected president. He emphasized the three keys to his platform being advocacy, accessibility, and accountability. In Gannon’s eyes, advocacy is the most important of the three for himself because he sees the role of SGA President as the student body’s voice for the administration. Many of Gannon’s goals involve advocacy towards the administration, such as securing an SGA Representative on the Transylvania Board of Trustees and pushing for increased transparency and student input on Transylvania’s 2030 Master Plan. In regard to the Master Plan, Gannon stressed the importance of ensuring student involvement, stating, “What do we do when certain foundational things are not given? Yet the school is expecting more money from us, and is now making a plan to expand the university that will only cause harm to us. More importantly, they don’t even ask our opinion on the matter so they don’t know what will harm us until it already happens.”

After general questions, the debate moved into specific questions for candidates for each of the four executive council positions. Chief of Finance candidate Brayden Strong was asked what experience he has in handling and organizing funds, where he pointed to his experience working at a local independent insurance agency and at his high school’s admissions office. For Chief of Staff candidates Kate Polson and Delta Pirkle, they were asked about previous experiences working with other people and how they would handle conflict between senators. Polson pointed to leadership roles she has held in other campus organizations, such as T-Unity, Muslim Student Association, and the Writing Center, and outlined her objective, common ground-based approach to conflict management. Pirkle highlighted their previous experience as an ambassador for their high school and the number of students they interacted with in that role, and half-jokingly referred to their experience babysitting for how they would deal with senator conflicts. For Vice Presidential candidates Max Hankins and Lakyn Totten, they were asked what they believed their role working with the President would be ike and what specific initiatives they would lead to better student life. Totten emphasized the importance of clear communication between the President and Vice President, so as to set a clear example for other senators. Hankins emphasized the flexibility in the duties of the Vice President when compared to the President, highlighting his ability to support the President while serving as a point of contact for senators. Sean Gannon was asked what motivated him to pursue a second term as SGA President, circling back to the unique opportunity for continuity in pressuring the administration to properly address the needs of students. 

The rest of the debate served as a town hall for students in attendance, with those in the audience posing specific questions to each of the candidates. The candidates discussed various topics, such as the importance of upholding DEI initiatives in student government and how each candidate planned to properly balance their SGA leadership obligations with their academic obligations. For specific questions, Strong was asked to address a past situation and how he had learned and changed from the experience prior to potentially taking on a public-facing leadership role, and Gannon was asked to elaborate on his relationship with the administration and how he has worked to bring issues like the 2030 Master Plan to the attention of students. 

This article is just a small portion of what each candidate had to say during the debate. SGA Elections will be held on Tuesday, April 1, so be sure to watch the video below to get a full sense of the goals and priorities of each of the candidates:

How to Make the World Feel Less Like it’s Falling Apart

It feels like the world is falling apart so here are some ways that you can build community, feel some semblance of control, and create some joy.

  • Practice patience and compassion – you never know what someone is going through and a little kindness goes a long way
  • Smile at strangers – this releases stress-relieving chemicals and promotes community
  • Run errands with friends – even the most mundane tasks can be a chance for community and fun with friends
  • Hug your loved ones – this releases stress-relieving chemicals and strengthens social connection
  • Use your local library – they offer so many resources from books to classes and are a prime spot for community building
  • Write and call your representatives – this small step makes your voice heard and shares the issues that matter to you most
  • Spend time in nature – fresh air and sunlight do your mental and physical health a world of good
  • Share your gratitude – thank the people around and celebrate each other’s successes

A Long, Strange Trip: The 1970s Through Film

A few months ago, Dylan Howell and I started 20th Century Catch Up, a movie-a-week series reviewing one film for every year from Taft to Y2K, which ended shortly. We decided to turn our planned personal project into an independent study and double dip on our weekly writings.

We’re honing in on the 1970s in American film, both as a reflection of life and an influence on culture. By focusing on one specific decade, we can narrow our analyses, noting particular aspects of film’s evolution as a reflection of America’s shifting cultural identity and distilling an argument for our final project: a podcast. Our independent study is by no means an “intro to film” course, but instead a deep dive into history, art, analysis, and argumentation. Get ready to ring in the new decade with those massive bell bottoms, because the country’s about to wake up from its American dream. Can you dig it?

WEEK 1 – Gimme Shelter (1970)

The Death of the ‘60s

Where to watch:

HBO Max

Content Warnings:

Moderate nudity, violence with frequent profanity, drug and alcohol use

Overview (by Sam):

Originally conceptualized as a 30-45 minute TV special promoting the Rolling Stones and documenting their 1969 tour, Gimme Shelter ultimately became a sobering dissection of the dawn of a new decade: one of cynicism, decay, and the purported death of the 1960s’ dream. Their notorious free concert at the Altamont Speedway in Alameda County, California, intended as a glorious tribute to humanity’s good nature, quickly became a violent failure, with “four births, four deaths, and an awful lot of scuffles reported.” The documentary is composed of footage from many different camera people and manages to perfectly capture the moment in artistic composition.

The most interesting part of this whole production is its framing. We begin in a studio with the Rolling Stones and several others listening back to a recorded statement by one of the Hells Angels present at the Altamont concert, rationalizing his brutal violence towards the ‘flower people’ who reportedly kicked over his bike. The Stones sit in grim defeat as they watch the footage from the concert that will soon be shared with the audience. Each member of the band is introduced one by one with a plain white text overlay. Finally, we get their perspective as the camera zooms in on one monitor: our title drop.

The first third of Gimme Shelter is about the previous weekend’s Madison Square Garden concert and the Rolling Stones recording Wild Horses in Muscle Shoals, acting as a successful “control” concert. You can see hints of foreshadowing when people climb up onstage while under the influence. We make it to Altamont about halfway through and the documentary changes face. The concert’s massive scope is captured with helicopter footage showing cars backed up for miles as throngs of pilgrims billow across the California plains. Members of the crowd are primarily hippies, with a few blue collar men here and there. As the night progresses and the situation intensifies, fights break out at the beginning of every song. Performers admonish, beg, and plead their audience to practice what they preach until the infamous stabbing of Meredith Hunter, after which the Stones continue playing like nothing happened. The movie sits in silence for some time as the sun rises on a new era and thousands of people return to their lives as a new decade dawns.

Sam’s part:

Gimme Shelter, named after my personal favorite Rolling Stones song off the album Let It Bleed, presents such a refined and singular narrative that it’s easy to forget it’s a documentary and not scripted and staged. One year after the assassinations of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy, the same year as man set foot on the moon, the great 60s experiment came to a violent end.

For the most part, Gimme Shelter is a compilation of concert footage with some neat behind the scenes stuff. While the Stones prepare for their Madison Square Garden concert (Ike and Tina Turner opened), the camera lingers on Mick Jagger’s emaciated torso, echoing in the haunting still of his face before the credits roll. Themes of drug abuse and alcoholism crop up throughout, from Keith Richards’ excessive drinking to acid-dropping concertgoers. The 4:3 aspect ratio makes it so faces fill the screen and actually brings the whole experience closer to an album cover than a movie.

This documentary captured several images that perfectly encapsulate the mood, the best of which is a Hells Angel death stare about an hour in. His eyes shoot daggers at the Stones with an unsettling fire behind them, juxtaposing the upbeat, hopeful songs blasting out into the desert.

Gimme Shelter and its 1970 sibling Woodstock would set the model for “rockumentaries” and other concert films, and I’d certainly recommend it if you’re a Rolling Stones fan.

Dylan’s part:

I am certainly more of a fan of The Beatles than The Rolling Stones. I have studied The Beatles and listened to their albums and most of the four’s solo work. However, with the Rolling Stones, I have only heard their more popular songs in passing. I think looking at the start of the ‘70s by comparing The Beatles and The Rolling Stones works very well, especially when that comparison includes their documentary films from 1971 and 1970, respectively. With The Beatles, many have said they were an encapsulation of the 1960s in America and Britain. This time of peace activism and experimentation has been romanticized. But The Rolling Stones were this “darker” and “edgier” take on boy bands at the time. Different from The Beach Boys and The Beatles, they were a band for the 70s. Gimme Shelter depicts this in a very disturbing way. Gimme Shelter functions as the death of the ideals and romanticization of the ’60s and shows that no matter how late you stay up in the peace march striking against the government or fighting for rights, eventually, you have to go home. The System still stands, and you have to go back home and fight it from there, and that is where the change mainly occurs. The Rolling Stones tried so hard to put on a free concert for people, which is essentially the 60s. But the crowds were continuously violent and refused to follow the requests of the band and those that put on the concert. There were four deaths during the concert but just as many births. I feel it truly says a lot about the desperation in the decade that would follow their concert. Known for its cynicism and nihilism is the decade that would bring us the film that made us believe a man could fly, the idea of a blockbuster, and Star Wars.

The Entrepreneurship Center: An Interview with the Interim Director 

To kick off the opening of the Sanders-Siebers Entrepreneurship Center, a week-long book giveaway was held for all Transy students. In collaboration with Awesome Ink, the center was able to provide enough copies of The Unbridled Spirit (volumes 1 and 2) for every student on campus. The Unbridled Spirit is a collection of lessons in business from Kentucky’s most successful entrepreneurs, many of whom are Transy grads. 

To find out more about the new Entrepreneurship Center, I sat down with the Interim Director Kaelyn Query to get a better understanding of the new space. 

Kaelyn discussed how the Center for Entrepreneurship program started in 2021. There was no physical space, but there was programming. The purpose of the center was to have a place where students interested in business ownership or entrepreneurship could have a place to learn, explore, gain experience, and make connections. She elaborated that the goal of this new center is still the same, but now with a physical space. It’s a place where students can grow a business concept or learn how they may start their own business one day. 

In addition to offering classes, the center will offer regular programming. This will include workshops, lunch and learns, speaker series, keynote speakers, and networking opportunities.  Kaelyn emphasized that the goal is to get students connected to people working in fields they have an interest in. It also presents the opportunity for people who may just want to learn more. 

Kaelyn emphasized that, “It doesn’t have to be that they own a business. It could also be that they just manage a business one day, which will be a lot of students here at Transy. So our goal is to get them in front of a number of programs and events and people to explore that.”

The space is open to all Transy students of all differing interests. In our interview Kaelyn said, “We’ve got folks coming in teaching sculpture classes related to starting your own studio. We’re working with a business professional in Lexington who owns a music studio, and he’s gonna come and teach people how to get started in the music business if that’s what you think you wanna do one day.”

While the space is business-focused, it’s not just for business students. Kaelyn encourages all students to use the space. Whether it’s for studying, meeting with a group, or for an event, it is open and available to use. She further explains, “We tried to set up the space so that it could be functional for a number of things. So all the furniture is movable, it’s all modular. So we really want it to be a space that’s used for everybody.” Outside of  Tuesday and Thursday classes and the occasional event, the space is open and ready to use. 

Kaelyn also encourages students to contact the Center if they have ideas for programming that they would like to see within the Center. She notes, “If somebody’s interested in learning how to make esports a career or a business, we can do that. It doesn’t have to just be what we create if another department, division, student, or group has something that they want us to help with, we’re happy to do that. And we would love to do that.” 

The Entrepreneurship Center partnered with Awesome Ink for their book giveaway to kick off the opening of the center. The Unbridled Spirit is a collection from the first ten years of inductees into the Kentucky Entrepreneurship Hall of Fame. The books were chosen because of the varying backgrounds of the Entrepreneurs. It is important to note that many graduated from Transylvania. The Unbridled Spirit gives a unique look at how they got started, why they created their business in the first place, and the trials they encountered.  Kaelyn discussed that, “We didn’t want it to just be business students because there are so many stories in there that aren’t about business-related industries. So that’s our goal with giving those books out and we hope that it sparks passion for people in a way outside of not being a business major.”

All of the programs that the center offers don’t require taking any specific classes. Kaelyn mentioned that the center’s goal for students is for them “literally just to learn more about entrepreneurship, do more in entrepreneurship, and network”.

Kaelyn mentioned to be on the lookout for more events and news from the center. She noted that, “We’re working with the Morlan Gallery on a sculptor that’s coming in that will also do some workshops here about commissioning your own art and opening your own studio. We’re working with the IT department on a coding event which will be in May.” 

The center is currently gearing up for the fall semester to begin programming and events. For more information and updates, go to: https://www.transy.edu/academics/center-for-entrepreneurship/ if interested in getting involved with the Entrepreneurship club, contact Jbroecker28@transy.edu.

Results of SGA Campus Climate Survey Published.

Editor’s Note: On Thursday, March 27, an analysis of the Student Government Association’s Campus Climate Survey was emailed to all students. The analysis was completed by SGA Academic Affairs Committee Member and Rambler Contributor Lyra Duffy. The analysis below has been unedited from what was sent out to all students:

SGA’s Campus Climate Survey was launched a few months ago with the purpose of understanding the academic needs of students. After a discussion panel with SGA Senators discussing their comments and complaints about courses, the survey was created with help from Laura Scroggins and Melissa Fortner. This survey was developed with a student perspective and overall continuing goal of striving for academic excellence. Eighty-four Transylvania students responded to the survey. The results of this survey have been further analyzed to showcase what ways Transylvania’s academic climate is working, and in what ways it can be improved. This survey is intended to identify potential academic challenges students may face and work to further inform faculty and staff of student opinion. While the results of this survey are targeted at faculty and staff, students can also use this information to better understand the consensus of fellow classmates. 

The survey questions were answered using a one to five ranking level for each prompt. When students were asked how engaged they generally feel in the classroom, 61.9% of students rated a level four on a five-point scale. This number exemplifies the high amount of students who do feel moderately engaged in their classes on campus. However, when students were asked if said engagement varies across courses, 42.9% of students rated a three, and 22.6% of students rated a four. This shows that students are feeling a strong sense of engagement but this engagement is not consistent and often is based on the specific course they are enrolled in. Based on this analysis it can be assumed that there are courses that lack that feeling of engagement. 

Students were then asked about the involvement of grades within their courses at Transy. When asked how frequently students receive communication or feedback about their grades, many students ranked a two (34.5%) or three (33.3%). This tells us that students are not receiving as much feedback or communication from their instructors based on their work in the course. This lack of communication has the potential to create anxiety for students when they are unaware of what direction their grades are going. With that being said, the type of course relates directly to the style of grade communication. This strong variation can be seen through 31% of students responding with a rank of four when asked how strongly their grade feedback varies for each course. This demonstrates that while communication over students’ grades may be lacking, it is strongly varied by the type of course and differs depending on the subject and professor.

Students were then asked about their classroom communities or sense of belonging and comfortability in Transy classes. The majority of students, 51.2% ranked a four out of five when asked about how they have felt supported in the classroom. When asked if this feeling of support varies across courses, 39.3% of students ranked a two out of five– showing that this support is fairly consistent. 

Lastly, students had the opportunity to share what classroom practices they benefited from. There were varying responses, however, 47.14% of students included the use of classroom discussions. Students noted how classroom discussions create more comfort and present the opportunity for students to be active participants in the classroom. Beyond that, 20% of students included how they also benefited from well-structured and organized lectures. 

When students were asked what classroom practices didn’t work well, a plurality of 21.4% responded with critiques on certain lecture styles that leave no room for student engagement or that are unorganized/difficult to follow. Beyond that, 17.1% of students also noted variations of group work did not work well in addition to flipped classroom structures. 

To look at the visual aid charts and anonymous feedback that accompany the data presented in this analysis, access that here.

Thank you for your time,

Lyra Duffy

TUSGA Academic Affairs Committee

First Engagements vs New Student Orientation: What’s New and What’s Not?

The upcoming change from First Engagements to New Student Orientation for the upcoming school year has raised eyebrows. Students and faculty alike have questioned the change. If you started your freshman year here at Transylvania University, then you most likely experienced First Engagements. You would go to a class, work with a professor and student leader, and participate in engaging events to get to know your classmates. Director of Student Success Jessie Rowe provided me with information regarding the new orientation to clarify what is different about the two and what inspired the change.

According to the descriptions listed in the “2025 New Student Orientation Position Descriptions” document within the Orientation Leader applications, “New Student Orientation at Transylvania University is a comprehensive program designed to help incoming students transition into college life. It includes campus tours, group discussions, social events, and academic workshops that foster community, build connections, and introduce students to campus resources. The program ensures students feel welcomed, supported, and prepared for their journey at Transy.”

The New Student Orientation carries a similar intention as First Engagements in that it provides the opportunity for social connection and community building. Advising and registration will be a bit different, but will still prioritize preparing incoming students. The largest difference is the class portion of First Engagements, and the credit that comes with it, has been eliminated. The dates have also been adjusted to make orientation closer to the first day of classes. Originally, new students would arrive on campus a week early, ending the FE program by the weekend. This gave new students a slight break before diving into their first semester at Transy. Now, it is planned for students to arrive on campus in the middle of the week, with the program extended to Labor Day, the Monday before classes begin. Though this does remove the small break before the semester, it could potentially allow a seamless transition into the beginning of college. The effects of these changes are currently unknown, so there is no telling whether or not it will benefit incoming students. 

The new program welcomes new positions available that differ slightly from the previous First Engagements Scholars we were used to: New Student Orientation Coordinators and Orientation Leaders. These two are described as follows according to the application form. “New Student Orientation Coordinators oversee the orientation process, manage Orientation Leaders, and ensure the smooth execution of activities and events. They act as the primary point of contact for Leaders, providing guidance and support. Orientation Leaders are student mentors who assist incoming students during Orientation. Each leader is assigned a cohort of new students, helping them navigate the transition to college, build connections, and feel supported. Leaders report to Coordinators, who guide and supervise their efforts. They play a key role in fostering community, offering academic support, and addressing student needs. Leaders are expected to maintain a strong presence at events, uphold professionalism, and complete administrative tasks, contributing to the success of new students and supporting the university’s commitment to diversity and inclusion.”

As previously mentioned, the intent of New Student Orientation is quite similar to First Engagements. Some unchanged elements include move-in day, which will be as it usually is, along with class Transy traditions such as the coin ceremony, greet line, and class picture. Social events will still be a major part of the orientation and the role of student leaders remains the same. The reshaping of the program intends to place more focus on transitioning to university living, providing opportunities for engagement amongst peers, creating community, and promoting the success of the incoming freshmen class. 

If you have any additional questions regarding the New Student Orientation, contact Jessie Rowe jrowe@transy.edu

Weather

Lexington
overcast clouds
50.8 ° F
52.1 °
50.1 °
80 %
0.6mph
100 %
Fri
64 °
Sat
62 °
Sun
71 °
Mon
66 °
Tue
71 °