Friday, December 12, 2025
Home Blog

The Life and Death of a Showgirl

0

Going from “Now you hang from my lips like the Gardens of Babylon” to “Did you girl-boss too close to the sun?”, fans of Taylor Swift have been dancing with their hands tied, grappling with their relationship with the singer-songwriter.

Listeners of all ages, genders, and ethnicities have indulged in a parasocial relationship with Taylor Swift for nearly a decade. I, myself, identify as a “Swiftie” and share my love of Taylor with millions of other fans. Her wide discography, possessing songs of all circumstances, genres, and melodies, has fostered a cult-like following with music-lovers across the globe; tattooed lyrics, themed parties, and friendship bracelets are just the tip of the iceberg. But, Taylor’s dancey tunes of “Foolish One” and the melancholy notes of “Peter” aren’t what leave listeners with a one-sided connection. Rather, the musician’s lyrics are the factor that has accumulated a historic fandom unlike any other.

Taylor has showcased her hidden English teacher from a young age of 18 with the release of her second album, Fearless. The golden record possesses a song by the name of “White Horse” that is one of Taylor’s initial examples of avid storytelling: “I’m not a princess, this ain’t a fairytale. I’m not the one you’ll sweep off her feet, lead her up the stairwell. This ain’t Hollywood, this is a small town. I was a dreamer before you went and let me down. Now it’s too late for you and your white horse to come around.” Such lyrics encapsulate a moment within a breakup when a wrongdoer tries to rekindle their tarnished relationship. Taylor uses the metaphor of a princess and a prince, claiming that, unlike the movies, she will not give in to a desperate performance or allow herself to be “saved” by the man who hurt her. Later on in the shift from country to pop, the album Red holds a song called “Nothing New.” The “From the Vault” track is telling of Taylor’s descriptive lyricism: “And my cheeks are growing tired from turning red and faking smiles. Are we only biding time ’til I lose your attention? And someone else lights up the room? People love an ingenue.” The lyrics describe the struggles endured by women in the music industry; they are prioritized and exploited until someone younger, prettier, and more profitable comes around. Moving on to the 2019 album Lover, the song “False God” incorporates metaphors and biblical allusions: “But we might just get away with it. Religion’s in your lips, even if it’s a false god. We might just get away with it. The altar is my hips, even if it’s a false god. We’d still worship this love.” Through references to Christianity, Taylor conveys a sense of uncertainty and sacrifice. Her and her partner’s devotion to each other may not accurately represent love, but they will overcome the obstacles in their dedication to one another.

Young Taylor Swift in a gold dress playing a red guitar on stage. Image credits: Pinterest

Taylor also experiments with storylines that haven’t happened to her directly. In Folklore, Taylor writes a song by the name of “Seven”: “And I’ve been meaning to tell you, I think your house is haunted. Your dad is always mad and that must be why. And I think you should come live with me, and we can be pirates. Then you won’t have to cry, or hide in the closet. And just like a folk song, our love will be passed on.” Swift puts herself in the shoes of a young girl whose best friend lives in an abusive household. By adopting a childlike innocence, Taylor can portray her character through immature terminology and fantasy. Moving to my favorite album, Evermore, “cowboy like me” incites feelings of yearning and grief: “Now you hang from my lips like the Gardens of Babylon. With your boots beneath my bed, forever is the sweetest con. I’ve had some tricks up my sleeve. Takes one to know one, you’re a cowboy like me, and I’m never gonna love again.” Once again, Taylor uses figurative language, this time a simile. By comparing her past lover to the Gardens of Babylon, the lost wonder of the world, Taylor asserts that there is no proof of their relationship. Only they hold the memories of their love, and such remembrance will never fade away, lasting forever in bittersweet agony.

Now, upon reading these in-depth lyrics, one can see Taylor’s growth in storytelling throughout the years. So, as we look at her most recent album, The Life of a Showgirl, the dismay and confusion that flooded through Swifties is understandable. The marketing of the album prior to its release left fans on the edge of their seats, excited for a burlesque-like, glamorous record. And, the first couple of tracks did not disappoint. The opening tracks, “The Fate of Ophelia” and “Elizabeth Taylor,” hold chords of power and lyrics of cheeky flair. However, track five, “Eldest Daughter”, left listeners cringing and expecting a “SIKE!” from the songwriter: “Every joke’s just trolling and memes, sad as it seems, apathy is hot.

Taylor Swift in an orange sparkly dress laying on a couch and looking into the camera. Image credits: Pinterest

Everybody’s cutthroat in the comments, every single hot take is cold as ice.” In analyzing the rest of the song, Taylor’s intention of criticizing internet culture, along with establishing the pressures and misunderstandings experienced by older siblings, is clear. But, listeners felt as though the song fell flat in keeping a consistent theme and describing such experiences in a serious, non-embarrassing way. 

Later on in the album, “Wi$h Li$t” resulted in listeners feeling out of touch with their once relatable role model: “They want that yacht life under chopper blades. They want those bright lights and Balenci shades, and a fat a** with a baby face…I just want you. Have a couple kids, got the whole block looking like you.” Taylor generalizes the rest of the world as wanting luxurious products and having materialistic priorities; she counters everyone by claiming to want to settle down and have a family. Upon listening, many felt as though Taylor had broken the unspoken rule: acknowledging her wealth. Obviously, Taylor doesn’t know or relate to listeners, as she is a billionaire superstar, and we aren’t. However, “Wi$t Li$t” seemed to rub such a discrepancy in listeners’ faces, provoking discontent around the album. Moving to “CANCELLED!”, Taylor truly establishes her millennial identity in odd lyrics: “Did you girl-boss too close to the sun? Did they catch you having too much fun? Come with me, when they see us, they’ll run. Something wicked this way comes.” This combination of chronically online references and dramatic imagery was the breaking point for listeners. It seemed as though there was no use in defending the album any longer

Now, I must admit, I enjoy a couple of songs from the controversial record. “Actually Romantic” and “Wood” have been played during several solo car rides home. But The Life of a Showgirl comes nowhere close to Evermore or The Tortured Poets Department in terms of critical lyricism. However, I don’t feel as though the lack of lyrical intricacy was the main issue with Taylor’s 12th studio album; I mean, 1989 was the epitome of light-hearted, poppy choruses. Instead, it was the singer’s explicit descriptions of wealth. Swift has been increasingly criticized as she has obtained billionaire status. Many fans have urged her to use her prosperity and fame to speak out on major issues. While she did endorse Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential election, Swift has failed to acknowledge the genocide in Gaza, along with the deportations involving ICE in America.

Image of Taylor Swift playing a small piano. Image credits: Pinterest

Despite the dislike revolving around Taylor’s recent album, I will always call myself a Swiftie. Swift’s complex songs helped me through heartbreak and academic struggles, and contributed to too many dance parties. Many listeners feel differently, though, and The Life of a Showgirl has unfortunately contributed to an increasing disconnect between artists and fans. Time will only tell if the previous affinity can be rekindled. As Taylor asks herself, “Is it over now?”

(inspired by my friend, Meghan, whose Swiftie identity has recently perished.)

Laufey: How this dreamer fell down the rabbit hole of fame

0

This article was co-written by Annie Kunkle and Lyra Duffy

Laufey, pronounced Lay-Vay, is a contemporary jazz singer from Reykjavik, Iceland. At age 15, she was playing with the Icelandic Orchestra and competing on Iceland’s Got Talent, which fueled her to pursue music in college. While attending the Berklee College of Music, Laufey studied cello performance and began her journey as a professional musician.

Rising to fame as an iconic contemporary jazz musician, she reignited a love and interest in jazz, especially for Generation Z. Initially posting jazz covers on her YouTube channel, Laufey released her first EP, Typical of Me, in 2021. This EP had a mix of covers inspired by artists such as Chet Baker, Ella Fitzgerald, and Billie Holiday. It also featured several original songs, one being “Best Friend,” based on her relationship with her twin sister Junia (Hoo-nee-ah). 

“It’s funny ’cause you drive me half insane. A universe without you would be thoroughly mundane.”

Best Friend by Laufey
Laufey holding hands with her twin sister Junia on stage during her tour. Image credits: @Laufeyland on Instagram

Junia has made a name for herself by acting as Laufey’s creative director for her music videos and A Matter of Time tour. The tour’s setlist even features an intimate jazz club spinoff during the concert. In this section, she rearranges her songs to be more raw and jazzy, offering new renditions of her own songs. As she has risen in the music world, she has created songs with a more poppy flair, but this section allows her to showcase her original sound and influences. By doing this, she draws in the audience to yearn for the intimate feel of a jazz show ambiance.

Laufey also provokes a sense of yearning through her romantic and fantastical storylines. In “Like the Movies,” she sings about her imagined love life and how she longs to experience an unrealistic expectation of love that is often represented in rom-com tropes. 

“Maybe one day I’ll fall in a bookstore into the arms of a guy. We’ll sneak into bars and gaze at the stars surrounded by fireflies.”

Like the Movies by Laufey

She also incorporates vivid imagery and figurative language in her lyricism. Heard in “Falling Behind,” Laufey compares natural elements to the ways they seemingly mock her love-life failures.

Laufey on stage during her tour reaching her hand out to the audience surrounded by spotlight. Image credits: @Laufey on Instagram

“’Cause the sun’s engaged to the sky, and my best friend’s found a new guy.”

Falling Behind by Laufey

Through a multitude of her songs, listeners can romanticize their lives, whether they are dreaming about their future romantic endeavors or agonizing about being left behind in the race to find love. Don’t be fooled, though. Laufey’s discography is not fully focused on love and heartbreak. She also writes about her childhood insecurities and pays homage to her heritage. These songs have become the most popular among her true fans by highlighting relatable struggles we have all experienced in some way. In a “Letter To My 13 Year Old Self,” she discusses how she felt as a child, left out of common experiences, and often feeling overlooked.

“I’m so sorry that they pick you last, try to say your foreign name and laugh. I know that you feel loud, so different from the crowd.”

Letter To My 13 Year Old Self by Laufey

Within the lyrics of “Forget-Me-Not”, Laufey pleads to never abandon her culture and upbringing in Iceland. She incorporates words from her native tongue, which encapsulate her desire to remain faithful to her origins and her immigrant story.

“Love you forever, don’t let go of me. I left my own homeland to chase reverie. Gleymdu mér aldrei þó ég héðan flýg. Gleymdu mér aldrei, elskan mín” (translated to: Never forget me, even if I fly away from here. Never forget me, my love)

Forget-Me-Not by Laufey
Laufey in a white dress holding Mei Mei, a white bunny plushie, by the ears. Image credits: Pinterest

Through Laufey’s openness and vulnerability, she has established a personal connection with her fans, which has created a niche and honest fan base. While Junia has developed Laufey’s brand to fit this cute, classy, and whimsical vibe, her fan base is so much more than that. During her concerts, she has emphasized this close relationship with her fans by choosing a “best dressed” attendee who gets to meet her and show off their outfit. Only Laufey and her fans could pull this off on such a vast scale. Not only does Laufey connect with her listeners on tour, but she also creates communities through an online book club and an original character, Mei Mei, the Bunny (seen on the left).

Laufey’s specific and personal bond with fans has filtered out any negativity or fragile masculinity within male listeners. With t-shirt merch saying, “Real Men Listen to Laufey,” she has established an audience of male listeners who aren’t afraid to make fun of performative men. Laufey often writes about how she has experienced an insincere facade from men, in hopes of catching her attention, in songs like “Mr. Eclectic.”

“Did you ever stop and give a wonder to just who you were talking to? The very expert on the foolish things that men have said to woo and win me over. What a poser, you think you’re so interesting.”

Mr. Eclectic by Laufey

With other songs like “Bored” and “James”, she further pokes fun at pretentious men who think they are so ideal and different from the rest.

Laufey has marketed herself as an “open book”, paving the way for listeners like us to feel seen and understood. Her music helps us romanticize our lives, better understand our emotions, and connect with a real artist who feels true to themselves. At the end of the day, she is an incredible musician and has one of the best voices of our time. She has revived jazz music and redefined the narrative of modern music. 

“No boy’s gonna kill the dreamer in me…”

Dreamer by Laufey

Gifts and Genocide: A Boycottter’s Guide to Being on the Right Side

0

t’s that time of the year again: the Christmas season is upon us, and you now have to start considering what gifts you’ll get for your loved ones. You’re likely tempted to go on Amazon and purchase whatever you can think of, but it’s high time for us consumers to start caring about where we get our gifts, why we get our gifts, and how we get our gifts. 

Corporations have become hostile in recent years, growing more and more problematic. Between unfair wages, unsafe labor practices, and a general evident greed, all of the world’s most popular brands are getting a bad name. In the midst of all this lie corporations that are in support of genocide, particularly the one occurring at Israel’s hands. Many companies indirectly or directly fund the genocide by providing soldiers with food, money, or any other sustenance. 

Basically, I’m here to tell you that most of your favorite brands are supporting an ethnic cleansing. It’ll be a tough pill to swallow—I can tell you for certain it was when I first heard it—but it’ll become easier as it goes on. I’ll tell you all about the BDS boycotts, and I’ll share with you some other brands that you should likely take off your roster. Don’t worry, I’ll give you some alternatives; I understand that it’s the season of giving, after all.

Image of brands that are priority boycott targets of BDS movement at the top, with organic boycott brands in the right bottom corner and pressure target brands in the left bottom corner
Image credits: Guide to BDS Boycott Movement

BDS and What to Boycott

BDS stands for “Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions”, and is a Palestinian-led movement focused on applying pressure to companies to end their support for Israel. It began in 2005, following a similar model to protest apartheid in South Africa. 

According to the website, BDS operates mainly as a “targeted boycott” organization, in which they will pick the largest, most complicit corporations to apply pressure on. This is done in hopes of creating a domino effect in which smaller corporations complicit in the genocide will also opt to end their affiliations with Israel. “Untargeted boycotts” target a greater number of corporations in order to spread influence. 

BDS states that their boycott target-selection criteria are as follows:

1. Level of complicity (based on accurate, convincing research that proves complicity)

2. Intersectionality (cross-movement relevance of the target)

3. Brand recognition and media appeal (helps reach a wider audience)

4. Potential for success

Their boycott is split into three targets: consumer boycott priority targets, organic boycott targets, and pressure targets. Consumer boycott priority targets require a complete boycott due to their explicit complicity in Israel’s genocide. Organic boycott targets are boycotts not directly created by the BDS, but are encouraged due to the companies’ complicity. Pressure targets need pressure campaigns: lobbying, social media pressure, peaceful disruption, etc. 

The list for each, as of September 2025, is as follows:

Consumer boycott priority targets (direct from BDS website):

1. Chevron (including Texaco and Caltex): responsible for extracting gas used by Israel.

2. Intel: invested $25 billion in Israel during the height of genocide; the largest international investor in Israel.

3. DELL: supplies servers, maintains services, and related equipment to the Israeli military.

4. Siemens: main contractor of the Euro-Asia interconnector, a submarine electricity cable planned to connect Israel to Europe. 

5. Hewlett-Packard (HP): provides technological and logistical support to Israel.

6. Microsoft: provides AI software and technology to Israel, crucial in furthering the genocide; by far the most complicit. Advised to boycott Xbox as well. 

7. Carrefour: given personal gifts to Israeli soldiers; possesses partnerships with multiple Israeli start-ups and banks.

8. AXA: holds millions of dollars in shares and bonds in companies that are supplying Israel with weapons.

9. Reebok: signed a sponsorship contract with the Israel Football Association (IFA) in early 2025. The IFA includes teams in illegal Israeli settlements on stolen land.

10. Disney+: dehumanizes Palestinians; revived racist character in Captain America, has worked with blatant supporters of Israel (including Gal Gadot and Shira Haas). 

11. SodaStream: complicit in displacing indigenous Bedouin-Palestinian citizens; known to discriminate against Palestinian workers. 

12. RE/MAX: markets and sells properly in illegal Israeli settlements. 

13. Israeli produce/products in supermarkets: most are products made in illegal settlements on stolen land; you should avoid being part of trade that fuels Israel’s economy.

Organic boycott targets:

1. McDonald’s: owns many franchises in Israel and offers free meals to Israeli soldiers. 

2. Coca-Cola: operates in illegal settlements; the main factory is in Atarot. 

3. Burger King: provides free food to Israeli soldiers and owns many franchises in Israel. Social media is used to uphold Zionist talking points.

4. Papa John’s: donated food to Israeli soldiers, owns many franchises in Israel. 

5. Pizza Hut: The parent company is an investor in Israeli start-ups, and social media posts have been made by them that appear to be mocking Palestinian prisoners.

6. Domino’s Pizza: owns many franchises in Israel; has a large presence in Israel.

7. WIX: Israeli company; has fired employees who have spoken out against the genocide. 

Pressure targets (direct from the BDS website):

1. Google: has signed a contract with the Israeli military allowing them to access AI services, data, and automation technology. 

2. Amazon: provided cloud computing infrastructure and other technological services to Israel, alongside Google. Amazon’s facial recognition technology is used for surveillance of Palestinians, and Ring cameras provide service to the United States police and ICE. 

3. Booking/Airbnb/Expedia: listed in the United Nations database of businesses implicated in Israel’s illegal colonial settlement enterprise.

4. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries: Israeli company; has supported Israel’s genocide for decades and exploits the captive Palestinian market. 

All of the targets I have just listed are ones officially listed on the BDS website, alongside most of their publicly accessible boycott lists. However, even outside of the BDS boycotts, there are still plentiful corporations that I recommend boycotting due to their support for Israel:

Non-BDS targets:

1. Starbucks: Former CEO Howard Schultz is a well-known Zionist and invests regularly in Israeli companies. Alongside this, Starbucks is known to be a union-busting company, suing a union that publicly expressed support for Palestine. 

2. TripAdvisor: listed in the United Nations database of businesses implicated in Israel’s illegal colonial settlement enterprise.

3. Motorola: listed in the United Nations database of businesses implicated in Israel’s illegal colonial settlement enterprise.

4. CitiBank: complicit in the violent occupation of Haiti, and publicly supports right-wing Israeli politicians; invests in Israeli infrastructure and tech sector as the largest bank in the United States. Has also directly lent money to Israel.

5. Hobby Lobby: major Christian Zionist donor. Also largely antisemitic, and has refused to cover contraceptives under insurance, and has stolen ancient artifacts illegally smuggled from places like Iraq.

6. Home Depot: one of the largest neoconservative and Zionist donors in the United States. Has also removed DEI benefits following the Trump administration and has multiple violations from OSHA and SOP.

7. WhatsApp: has donated millions of dollars to Zionist lobbying; an AI system is used by Israel to track and kill Palestinians in Gaza. 

Even outside of Israel, there are a number of companies that still should be boycotted due to their human rights violations, their support of the oppression of minorities, etc. That list is as follows:

General boycott targets:

1. Nestle: endangers the lives of infants using their baby milk products, and practices unethical business affairs, such as child labor, slavery, and an adverse effect on the environment through their water bottling. 

2. SHEIN: steals designs, creates extensive harm towards the environment, and uses child labor practices in order to produce its fashion items. 

3. Temu: products can be highly toxic. Has also been known to steal designs and use extensive child labor to produce items. 

4. Apple: numerous human rights issues; known to make products built on child labor (in places such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo) and has unsafe factory conditions. 

5. Spotify: known to run recruitment ads for ICE, allow AI-generated advertisements and music, and severely underpay artists. The CEO has also invested $693.6 million in defense startup technology, known to be used by countries like Israel, the United States, and China. 

So, what does that leave us?

Not a lot, it may seem at first. However, boycotting is fairly easy; there are numerous alternatives to any given product. 

I’ve personally been boycotting since 2023, with much of my boycott efforts being centered around fast food. I’ve not touched McDonald’s or Starbucks. Though I sometimes miss the taste of a McDonald’s Bacon, Egg, and Cheese McGriddle, I can confidently say that no matter how good any food or coffee is, it’s not worth contributing to the problem. It’s the same with things like Microsoft and Disney+; there are numerous ways to access the things these services provide to you without having to give money to a terrible cause. 

I would say the general rule of thumb is to shop locally. Whether it be food or gifts, there is always something you can find at a small business that’ll be made with much more love and care than anything from big corporations. Personally, some of the best food I’ve ever had has been from small businesses; they’re far better than fast food any day of the week. 

If you find yourself unable to shop locally in person, do it online. Shop small businesses on places like Etsy, or buy stuff second-hand from places like eBay or Depop. Is it expensive? It can be, but I would argue the price is worth it for the knowledge you’re not contributing to something heinous. 

Second-hand stores are probably the best advice I can give for getting gifts, whether it be for yourself or someone else. You can call it embarrassing or tacky to get someone something second-hand all you want, but at the end of the day, some of the world’s greatest treasures come from thrift stores. Besides, you don’t need the newest thing every time it arrives; you don’t need the newest iPhone, the newest clothing line, the newest gimmicky decorations that come from Target every holiday that’ll only end up in landfills by the time the holiday’s over. None of it—and I mean this with utmost sincerity—NONE of it is necessary. If you wanna get someone something particular, then go for it—just make sure it’s something they actually want and/or need so it doesn’t end up sitting and rotting on one of their shelves. Or in a landfill.

How/Why to Boycott

You may be wondering to yourself what the point of boycotting even is. “Well, now, it’s not gonna harm any cause if I don’t boycott,” you’re thinking. Unfortunately, you’re not alone in thinking that; I assure you that thousands, if not millions, of others are, too. Yes, one person not boycotting may not hurt the cause, but it isn’t just one person—it’s many people. 

Boycotting is vital as it sends a direct message to corporations about what we as consumers think about their values. Boycotting has been an essential part of protesting for decades; by far, the most prominent example of boycotting was the Montgomery bus boycott from 1955 to 1956, where people protested the segregation present on Montgomery buses. Even now, boycotting is a vital part of many movements and has proven effective. Sales have been declining for both McDonald’s and Starbucks, with McDonald’s reporting a decline in global sales in 2024 and Starbucks reporting a dip in North American sales by 2% and a dip globally by 7%. Clearly, boycotting works, so long as everyone does their part. 

So, what exactly is the right way to go about boycotting? While there is no exact guidebook, the general consensus is to stop buying products by the brand you’re wishing to boycott. Anything with the label funnels funds directly to the corporation, except for bootleg and second-hand stuff. For all you Starbucks fans, this includes their cups, their instant coffee mixes, those iced coffee bottles you sometimes see… all of it. For all you McDonald’s fans, this means you have to stop buying their Happy Meals or whatever gimmick they have going on that is vaguely attached to your favorite anime or franchise. I can’t begin to explain my frustration with seeing all of my friends rush to buy McDonald’s the second they dropped something related to A Minecraft Movie. 

Alongside this, it’s important to spread the word. Tell your friends and families to boycott, explain to them the benefits of it, give them alternatives, the whole nine yards. Post about it on social media, as well, and uplift others who are boycotting the same things you are. Join global boycott days where people don’t buy anything for an entire day, or don’t buy a specific brand or product for an entire day.

Most importantly, do your own research. I am not going to sit here and pretend I know every single brand that has ever done something terrible. Alongside this, while I’ve done a great deal of research on this topic, there is a chance I got things wrong in this article. Make sure to look at everything through your own critical lens and decide what you should and shouldn’t boycott. 

Image of a man holding up a written poster that says, “Boycott Divest Sanction” with the Star of David behind the V of “Divest.” Image Credits: commons.wikimedia.org

Conclusion

At the end of the day, it will take a lot more than just boycotting in order to fully end Israel’s genocide against Palestine. However, as powerless as we may be in terms of government, we are powerful as consumers; we can directly prevent companies from gaining revenue and show them that their support has consequences. So, when you’re buying your gifts this holiday season, just remember: you have a choice. Make it wisely. Be on the right side of history.

LexCon Zine Fest: Students bring Community and Art to Transy through Comics

On Saturday, November 15th, Transy seniors and StripClubComics co-founders Alice Beatty and Sam Schultz put together a community-building, art showcasing event they call Lexington Confidential – or LexCon Zine Fest in Transy’s Pio Rooms. 

The premier event housed members of the Transylvania community, such as The Rambler, The Transylvanian, alumni Morgan Hardigree and Nicole Herman, student band Maybe Next Year, professor panelists, and more, making appearances alongside other Lexington artists and students selling their goods. Between panels, musical guest Tiramisu, a local jazz-fusion band, performed jazz covers as patrons visited booths.

LexCon founders Alice Beatty (left) and Samuel Schultz (right) at their ‘Scully and Boone’ panel

Starting the evening with their own panel, Sam and Alice did a presentation on their comic series Scully and Boone, an undead-detective tale set in Chicago. Over the summer, the comic-making duo received a travel grant from the University and were able to visit Chicago for research. Learning local ghost stories, architecture, and travel routes, the experience helped them world-build more accurately and come up with new characters and storylines for future development. For example, Alice came up with designs for a gargoyle creature based on architecture and lore they came across, which their characters, Scully and Boone, will battle on the Chicago “L” metro system.

The LexCon event itself was actually part of Sam and Alice’s grant. The Grant Allocation Committee asks that students who receive grants give a presentation on how they used the money or create something to show for their travels. Using the last of their budget, LexCon was a step further. “We wanted to have some fun event around it, something comic-themed,” Alice explained. “We decided to do a kind of ‘Comic Con’ thing, make it a whole community event, and bring a lot of other creatives in on it.”

Guest speakers show examples of their work at the Animation panel

The event featured three panels in total. After Sam and Alice’s Scully and Boone panel, which acted as their grant presentation, Animation professor David Gerhard – known for his work on shows such as Midnight Gospel, Invader Zim, Breadwinners, and much more – hosted “From Strip to Screen: Adapting Comics for Animation” with guest animators Greer Givens and Eric V-L. The three shared stories on their experiences with turning comic stories into animated series or films. 

To end the event, Transylvania University faculty Anthony Mead – Director of the Morlan Gallery and Adjunct Instructor of Art – and Rebekah Gordon – Assistant Professor of Religion – hosted a “History of Zines” panel in which they explained where zines came from historically and how they find themselves in our modern society. They also lead a collaborative zine-making activity, where anyone can make their own zine. Afterward, the zines would be sent to Transylvania’s Special Collections of zines in the form of a booklet to memorialize the day and the products of our community.

Merchandise and comics for purchase at the ‘StripClubComics’ table during the LexCon event

Sam and Alice hope the event will bring more patrons to their comic series as well. StripClubComics is an indie comic collection, completely self-published and hand-drawn. Alice and Sam founded it with the intention of bringing together their friends and showcasing their talents; writers and artists working together to make something pun-filled, fun, and impressive. 

The team, including a long list of Transy (and some non-Transy) student artists, produces many series within their editions, Scully and Boone being just one example. However, the killer noir series grew too big for the magazine editions and broke out into its own book with the help of the grant-funded trip to Chicago. Other series in the StripClubworld include Pulver-eyes – a superhero spoof, Los Animos PD – an animal buddy cop series, and more

Alice and Sam have shown time and time again that their commitment to taking creativity to the next level is something worth paying attention to. From starting their own comic book series to creating their own “Comic Con” inspired event, they’re always working on something big and exciting. 

Maybe LexCon will return, but for now, keep your eyes out for new StripClub editions and Hot Singles – a mini series of one-off comics, in the StripClubComics magazine boxes around Lexington, and find updates on their website!

A Comprehensive History of the Goth Subculture

The goth subculture has largely become an enigma to the common person. Nowadays, it’s widely misattributed to numerous things: primarily, emo, punk, or “baddie” culture. It has been blamed for numerous school shootings, such as Columbine, and goths have been the victims of violence in the past; in the case of Sophia Lancaster and Robert Maltby, the pair were attacked and murdered in 2007 by a group of teenagers for identifying with the goth subculture. 

Let’s get one thing straight: goths aren’t evil. Goths aren’t satanic. Not all goths engage in self-harm, smoking, or drug use. Likely, all of the stereotypes you’ve been taught about goths are wrong; in actuality, the goth subculture has a long and rich history, full of moody music and people with fishnets and wild hair. In honor of the spooky season passing by, let me—a baby bat, or newer goth for clarification—lead you into a deep dive through the comprehensive history of the goth subculture, going all the way back to where it started up until now.

Intro to Gothic Horror (1700s-1900s)

The gothic horror genre is the first traceable aspect of goth culture. It is categorized by incredibly gloomy and dark elements, ranging from despair and decay to witchcraft. Many gothic horror novels play with the supernatural and death. 

While the first novel that was widely considered to be “gothic horror” was written in 1764, the genre can be traced back even further; many early gothic writers were inspired by elements of William Shakespeare’s work, with many of his most notable tragedies—such as Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, and Hamlet—containing ghosts, supernatural occurrences, witchcraft, and revenge. John Milton’s Paradise Lost, written in 1667, also proved to be an early baseline for Gothic writers, particularly taking note of Milton’s depiction of the anti-hero Satan. This character would serve as a model for many Gothic villains and Byronic heroes. Poetry also proved to be a line of inspiration, beginning with Alexander Pope’s 1717 poem Eloisa to Abelard, containing a tale of star-crossed lovers with religious terror and melancholic imagery. This poem’s influence can be observed through Horace Walpole’s work, along with many other 18th-century Gothic literature artists. The Graveyard Poets—pre-Romantic poets categorized by their depictions of mortality—also laid the early foundations of common gothic imagery, crafting the depictions of skulls, graveyards, and bones that became staples of the gothic genre. 

Many early Gothic works were set in castles or other medieval settings. In the 1700s, England in particular had an obsession with reclaiming a shared past; works set in medieval times became more prominent and widely accepted, even before the first widely regarded Gothic novel. Even as the gothic horror genre expanded outside the confines of Europe, medieval settings still remained commonplace, later being observed in works by Edgar Allan Poe and other American authors. 

The Castle of Otranto by Horace Walpole is largely regarded as the first Gothic horror novel, and included the subtitle of A Gothic Story in later editions. It was generally unpopular upon its release; many felt that a modern author should not be writing about the supernatural in a “rational” age. In spite of this, the story inspired many imitations, such as Clara Reeve’s The Old English Baron (1778) and Sophia Lee’s The Recess (1783-85). The gothic novel’s popularity was at its height in the 1790s, synonymous with Ann Radcliffe’s strides into the genre. Her 1794 novel The Mystery of Udolpho was a bestseller, critical in setting off the craze. 

As gothic literature began to grow in popularity, it gave birth to a new formation of the genre: the Female Gothic. The subgenre was guided by writers such as Radcliffe and Mary Shelley, and provided an outlet for the sexual and societal desires of women to be stated. Many common narratives of the female Gothic were an absent mother and fleeing from a villainous father, alongside the emergence of the ghost story, which permitted women to write about something other than the common marriage narrative. Other authors, such as Mary Robinson, opted to abolish the damsel-in-distress and instead feature sexually assertive heroines, transgressing traditional gender conventions of the female Gothic. 

Another form of Gothic was the Gothic bluebooks and chapbooks, which were shorter and cheaper versions of Gothic literature. Many of these pieces were plagiarized from preexisting Gothic novels, with Matthew Lewis’s The Monk becoming a particularly strong target. This saturation of Gothic literature was met with much criticism and made the Gothic genre a subject of many satirical pieces and parodies. This satire was most prominent from the 1790s to the 1820s, eventually outnumbering actual Gothic pieces in 1800. Jane Austen, most known for her work Pride and Prejudice, also dipped her toes into satirical Gothic literature with her 1818 novel Northanger Abbey

The second generation of Gothic horror was spurred on by the works of Lord Byron and provided the foundation for the Byronic hero. Lord Byron was a particularly prominent figure in Gothic history, having hosted a ghost-story competition on the banks of Lake Geneva in 1816. From this competition, two notable pieces of Gothic literature spawned: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) and John William Polidori’s short story “The Vampyre” (1819). Both pieces were incredibly influential, with “The Vampyre” creating a vampire craze and Frankenstein starting the science fiction genre alongside Jane C. Loudon’s The Mummy! (1827). 

During the second generation, Gothic began to spread to other countries. Countries such as Germany, Spain, and Russia began honing Gothic novels, with many drawing on societal folklore and religion. Consequently, it began to fizzle out as the dominant genre in England as the Victorian era began, being replaced by the newly formed historical fiction. Gothic short stories remained popular, however, in the form of chapbooks called penny dreadfuls. One of the most influential penny dreadfuls is Varney the Vampire, released anonymously in 1847, which introduced the trope of vampires possessing sharp teeth/fangs. 

The most influential Gothic writer of the Victorian era was Edgar Allan Poe, an American who reinterpreted many Gothic tropes. Widely, he is considered the master of the American Gothic, and many of his stories and poems have gone on to influence many other Gothic writers. He is known for works such as his poems “The Raven”, “Annabel Lee”, and “The Bells”, alongside his short stories The Fall of the House of Usher, The Tell-Tale Heart, The Cask of Amontillado, and The Black Cat

Many novels were also known to draw from Gothic ideals, such as Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights (1847), which included a Byronic hero and supernatural occurrences. Famous author Charles Dickens was also heavily influenced by the Gothic genre, having read many Gothic novels in his childhood. Many of his pieces, including Oliver Twist (1837-1838) and Great Expectations (1860-1861), include gloomier elements common with Gothic literature, such as a dark atmosphere and engendering melancholic feelings. Gothic also created religious connections, with many Irish Catholic and Anglo-Irish writers beginning to write within the genre. 

The 1880s saw the revival of Gothic under the subgenre Urban Gothic, fictionalizing the fin de siecle (end of century) fear of ethical degeneration and questioning particular social structures at the time. Popular works underneath this subgenre include Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1888), Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891), and Richard Marsh’s The Beetle (1897). Irish writers also produced arguably some of the most influential Gothic pieces of all time, with Sheridan Le Fanu’s In a Glass Darkly (1872) introducing the vampiress Carmilla and Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897) creating the most famous Gothic villain, Count Dracula. 

At the turn of the twentieth century, Gothic literature became intertwined with the rise of Modernism. James Joyce’s 1922 novel Ulysses transforms the living into ghosts, pointing to the historical Irish context in a way that keeps the haunting elements of traditional Gothic novels while simultaneously revoking the supernatural elements present in nineteenth-century Gothic fiction. Pulp magazines reprinted classic Gothic literature by authors such as Poe, while simultaneously printing new authors incorporating both new and old Gothic elements. The most significant author was H.P. Lovecraft, who developed the Cthulhu Mythos, something that would influence Gothic writers and contemporary horror. The turn of the century would also cause the development of other Gothic subgenres, such as the Southern Gothic and the Romantic Gothic. Contemporary Gothic would also later be developed by writers such as Stephen King, Neil Gaiman, and Anne Rice, and remains the most popular form of Gothic literature in the modern day. 

Gothic horror continued to be popular throughout the 1900s, spawning many movie remakes of classic Gothic novels—such as the 1931 Dracula movie, starring Bela Lugosi—and many writers imitating the classic Gothic style. Soon, however, Gothic horror would give rise to a new form of Gothic, this time spawning in the world of popular culture and music. 

Proto-Goth and Post-Punk (1900s-1980s)

Proto-goth, or literally “original goth”, is considered the precursor to what would later become Gothic rock. Psychedelic rock, rock and roll, and proto-metal are among the genres encompassed in the proto-goth title, with some rather unorthodox influences being named when discussing proto-goth influences. 

Screamin’ Jay Hawkins is one of the first instances of proto-goth. A pioneer of “shock rock,” Hawkins frequently employed gothic elements in his performances, including rising out of coffins and brandishing a walking stick decorated with a skull. His most famous song, “I Put A Spell On You,” is a blues-style horror ballad, complete with grunting and moaning alongside chilling instrumentals. True to his name, Hawkins also employed screaming in many of his tracks, proving himself as a precursor to the metal genre as well.

In the same vein lies Alice Cooper, considered the “Godfather of Shock Rock” by many due to his theatrical performances combining horror movie elements with live music. His performances were also deeply rooted in a darker hilarity, being cited by journalist Simon Reynolds as an influence due to his “theatrics and black humor”. 

When citing gothic influences, most opt to point to the Velvet Underground & Nico. Their darker, experimental sounds alongside the cold tones of Nico’s vocals set them apart from many other ’60s and 70s bands, with Nico’s 1969 album, “The Marble Index”, occasionally being considered the first goth album. Nico is widely debated as the “first-ever goth girl,” and her voice is praised for its melancholic, icy tone, marking her and the Velvet Underground as staples for the gothic genre. Even following Nico’s departure from the band, the Velvet Underground continued perpetuating gothic sounds, setting them in stone as one of the most influential rock bands in history alongside their gothic label. 

By far, however, one of the most prominent examples of proto-goth is the Doors. A psychedelic rock band from the 60s, the Doors stood out due to their moody sounds and poetic lyrics, courtesy of lead singer Jim Morrison. The Doors were the first band to ever be labeled with the gothic rock genre, even as far back as 1967, following the band’s debut. Indirectly, the gothic rock pipeline can be traced back to them, casting aside the fact that they were the first ones to be considered the genre in the first place. In October of 1967, at the University of Michigan, the Doors performed a rather disastrous set, resulting in much of the Homecoming crowd being angry. Their sound was terrible due to a haphazardly put-together sound system, and Jim Morrison was angrily and drunkenly shouting back at the crowd. This show was attended by a young James Newell Osterberg Jr., who was captivated by the performance and felt he had no excuse not to engender the same feelings with his own band. He went on to develop the stage name Iggy Pop and formed the Stooges, considered to be the first ever punk band. 

Punk rock quickly rose throughout the 1970s as a predominant response to the failure of the hippie movement of the 60s. Punk music was characterized by its angry sounds and political lyrics, while punk culture was characterized by anarchy, mohawks, and spikes. It was widely considered to be a much heavier response to the failures of the hippie movement. In the midst of the 70s, however, brought a harsher viewpoint of the punk genre, with many punks believing that punk rock had become a sterile genre, giving in to corporate interests while failing to follow through with the same ideals that formed punk to begin with.

In the wake of this shift in 1977 came the post-punk genre, which was used to describe bands that departed from the harsher sounds of traditional punk rock and experimented with non-goth influences and sounds. Many post-punk bands experimented with funk, jazz, and electronic music, seeking a wider medium for their work. The first post-punk band is considered to be Siouxsie and the Banshees, being claimed to be the first group to make the transition from punk to post-punk by music journalist David Stubbs. Public Image Ltd is another widely recognized pioneer of the post-punk genre, having been formed by former Sex Pistols lead singer John Lydon, who disbanded Sex Pistols due to feeling that punk music had become too commercialized and predictable. The band Wire’s shift in musical direction also marked a crucial starting point for post-punk, alongside the formation of bands such as Magazine, Cabaret Voltaire, and Gang of Four. Later post-punk bands would include the Cure, the Damned, Joy Division, and the Raincoats. 

By the late 70s, post-punk was still a thriving genre and would continue to be such until suffering a decline in the 1990s. From post-punk came several new musical genres, including avant-garde funk, new wave, and gothic rock. The gothic scene had its foundation laid during the post-punk craze, with many post-punk bands later being considered the mothers and fathers of gothic rock. However, gothic rock truly did not get its start until the band Bauhaus released their debut single, “Bela Lugosi’s Dead”, in 1979, thus birthing the gothic subculture. 

Bauhaus and the Birth of Goth (1980s)

Image from musikexpress.de

The emergence of gothic nightclubs, such as the F Club in the late 70s and 80s, set the stage for the gothic rock genre to formulate. While many post-punk bands had begun receiving the gothic rock label, the birth of goth is understood to lie with Bauhaus. They released the single “Bela Lugosi’s Dead” in 1979, stating it was a “tongue-in-cheek” song. It was widely taken seriously, however, and from then on, many post-punk bands began incorporating gothic elements into their music. Siouxsie and the Banshees’s fourth album, Juju, lyrically and sonically included a darker aesthetic, a fact attributed by bassist Steven Severin to the influence of rock band the Cramps. The Cure followed suit, releasing a trio of albums—Seventeen Seconds (1980), Faith (1981), and Pornography (1982)—that solidified them into the genre. Quickly, the Cure became the most successful gothic rock band, both in terms of commercial success and influence. Their style became known as “withdrawn”, conflicting with many of their contemporaries at the time. Nick Cave’s band, the Birthday Party, became known for drawing on violent Old Testament imagery, with their song “Release the Bats” in 1981 becoming particularly influential for the early goth scene. 

Goth further continued to expand in 1981 as bands became more attuned to gothic music. UK Decay frontman Steve Abbott used the term “punk gothique” to describe his band’s music, a term that would later be used in a Sounds article to speculate on the future comings of the genre. Writer Cathi Unsworth considers Abbott to be the first to attribute the gothic label to music and culture. In spite of bands’ positive reception towards the label, the general public was still rather hostile towards the subculture until 1982, when the nightclub the Batcave opened. The Batcave became an important part of gothic culture, with many emerging gothic rock bands—such as Specimen—performing there regularly. Also in 1982 came the publication of Propaganda Magazine, a catch-all gothic-centric magazine that pushed the genre further into the international mainstream. The term “positive punk” was formulated in 1983 to describe the scene, being attributed to bands like Bauhaus, UK Decay, Alien Sex Fiend, and other staple gothic rock bands at the time. Myriad Goth also emerged this year. 

A shift in gothic culture became evident with the formation of the Sisters of Mercy, a gothic rock band from Leeds. According to journalist Jennifer Park, “The original blueprint for gothic rock had mutated significantly. Doom and gloom was no longer confined to its characteristic atmospherics, but as the Sisters demonstrated, it could really rock.” The band created a harder sound for gothic rock, inspiring many more mutations of the gothic genre, including a more ethereal version presented in bands such as Dead Can Dance and Cocteau Twins. Later stages emerged in the late 80s and 90s, with many bands emerging from dissolved gothic rock bands (such as Bauhaus and the Sisters of Mercy). 

The United States also received its fair share of gothic rock culture. Californian bands such as 45 Grave and Christian Death emerged with a new subculture called deathrock, which was a more punk-rock-inspired take on gothic rock, utilizing glam rock and horror movie visuals. Many American punk bands were credited with being influential to the genre and considered pioneers of other goth-adjacent genres such as “gothabilly” and “horror punk”. 

For the remainder of the 1980s, gothic rock and deathrock seemed to mellow out, turning more underground for a brief moment. By the time the 1990s came around, however, the gothic rock genre saw its “third wave”, effectively reviving and transforming the genre. 

A Gothic Evolution (1990s-present)

The 1990s brought on a different and unique version of gothic music, courtesy of crossovers from the industrial music, electronic, and metal scenes. Gothic rock became rather repetitive and techno, and it largely took over the original gothic rock scene, with many first-generation gothic rock songs and deathrock songs getting taken off of club setlists. This resulted in the goth movement largely turning underground, breaking into even more subgenres, including cyber goth, shock rock, and gothic metal. 

Gothic metal was widely praised for blending gothic elements with heavier metal sounds. The most prominent artist of the genre was Marilyn Manson, being considered a “goth-shock icon” and pioneering much of gothic metal. Other pioneers include Type O Negative, My Dying Bride, and Anathema, all from varying parts of the world. The gothic metal band Theatre of Tragedy, in particular, pioneered the “beauty and the beast” vocal style, combining feminine vocals with hard, masculine vocals. Symphonic metal was formed from gothic metal as well, developed by artists such as Nightwish and Within Temptation. 

Despite the gothic genre’s turn into the underground, it was far from inactive; gothic elements were still widely observed in popular music, being included in music by bands such as the Smashing Pumpkins and Nine Inch Nails. The gothic rock and deathrock club night Release the Bats in Halloween 1998 furthered the resurgence; it became the longest-running club night in Long Beach and was Southern California’s most frequented goth night. Its success led to many more deathrock club nights being created, and this—alongside the rise of music piracy giving people access to older deathrock bands—led to the first revival of deathrock. New deathrock bands began to formulate, and many merged elements of deathrock with no wave and synthpunk. Many groups also began to utilize the style popularized by the Batcave, giving rise to the aesthetic that goth is most commonly associated with today. 

The gothic subculture was put into question following the 1999 Columbine shooting. Media reports portrayed the two gunmen as members of a gothic cult, furthering suspicions of the gothic subculture. Unfortunately, school shootings would become a common association with goth; following the 2006 Dawson College shooting, the shooter was known to have been interested in the gothic subculture, thus furthering a connection between the two. Much of this has led to stereotyping and rumors that all goths are “satanic” or “evil” in some way, portraying all of them as violent, despite most goths believing firmly in nonviolence. This has resulted in prejudice, bullying, and violence being perpetuated against goths. 

In the 2000s, gothic metal reemerged in Europe, becoming mainstream. Bands such as HIM, the 69 Eyes, and Lullacry had breakout success, releasing chart-topping albums or singles. United States gothic metal bands had less luck; only a few had commercial success, including Type O Negative and Evanescence. Meanwhile, deathrock continued to spread, taking advantage of the fairly new internet space. Many websites, such as MySpace and LiveJournal, were prominent during this time for deathrock and gothic rock bands. Deathrock also implemented broader sounds, including psychobilly and futurepop. 

The 2010s and 2020s have largely brought a new appreciation for the gothic subculture as a new generation ushers in. New gothic cultures have been formulated, including that of mall goth and emo goth. While many of the “classic” gothic rock bands have broken up, many still remain, including the Cure. A newer wave of gothic rock music has also become prominent, seen in bands such as Lebanon Hanover, The Kentucky Vampires, and Nox Novacula. The classic goth bands are still largely appreciated, now considered “trad goth” by most. The goth scene also inhabits much more of a diverse presence compared to its nearly all-white starting point; bands such as She Wants Revenge, The Ire, and Light Asylum contain people of color, with some entirely consisting of people of color. More locally, Scary Black is a solo gothic musician from Louisville, KY, said to be “redefining goth”, according to afrogoth.com. The AfroGothic culture is an incredibly unique one, and Gothic cannot be Gothic without the presence of AfroGothic. Leila Taylor’s book Darkly: Black History and America’s Gothic Soul is an excellent book that explores AfroGothic history in a way I cannot. 

The State of Goth

Image from flickr.com

So, where does this leave goth today?

While the gothic subculture is still alive and well, a bit of toxicity has crept in through the cracks. Goths on TikTok, in particular, state that the gothic subculture has become a rather hostile environment towards baby bats (newer goths, as a reminder), with many people gatekeeping goth bands and being disrespectful towards those who have not familiarized themselves with the subculture yet. The existence of things such as “clean goth” has attempted to make a mockery of the gothic subculture, while debates around mall goth exist as to whether or not it’s a valid form of goth. Goths are still widely mocked and misrepresented, though violence against them has subsided in recent years, thankfully. 

Whether or not you “look” goth doesn’t matter; it’s the music and politics that count. As long as you listen to gothic rock music and believe in leftist ideology, you are free to call yourself goth. Even if you dress in a more cutesy style, more emo, or more casual, you can still be goth. Anyone can be goth, and it is not a subculture that can be gatekept or hidden. Goth is goth. Goth will always be goth, no matter what shape its style or music may take. 

If you find yourself interested in goth music after reading this article—or you’re already interested in it and want to find more artists—there are numerous playlists on all streaming platforms containing tons of goth songs. If you’re just starting out with goth music, I’d recommend starting with the big three: Bauhaus, the Cure, and Siouxsie and the Banshees. From there, you can branch out wherever, or you can just skip the big three altogether and go on your own path. There are numerous subgenres of goth to choose from, not just classic/trad goth, and no matter what your taste is, you’ll most likely find a band or two that you like. If you want to dress up in the goth style, go for it! Dress however you’d like. The whole point of goth is being innovative and creative, so design your own style; you don’t have to fit the status quo of “trad goth”, “vampire goth”, “mall goth”, or any other type of goth if you don’t want to. If you do want to, however, then go ahead! 

Goth is a beautiful subculture, and even if you don’t enjoy the music, I’d highly recommend looking into it just to appreciate its history and everything else about it. At the very least, all we goths ask is that you respect us as people—and stop confusing us with emos. We’re supposed to hate those guys, according to South Park. 

‘Invisibility and Erasure’ – Amrita Chakrabarti Myers tells the Story of Julia Chinn Erased from History

0

In the second part of Transy’s Creative Intelligence series, Amrita Chakrabarti Myers spoke about ‘Invisibility and Erasure’ and how these themes relate to her book, The Vice President’s Black Wife: The Untold Life of Julia Chinn. You might be wondering, just as I was, how a vice president’s wife can be almost completely erased from any records. The answer to this question is systematic racism in America, and specifically, in Kentucky. 

Dr. Myers starts her talk by showing images of quilts that belonged to Julia Chinn’s grandson, and states that since there aren’t any confirmed portraits of Chinn, she uses these quilts to represent her and her family. Myers decided to have one of these quilts as the border of the book cover. She compares these quilts to her journey in telling Chinn’s story by saying that it was “like putting together a patchwork quilt”. Unlike most quilt projects, Myers had to go to great lengths in searching for the pieces of fabric before sewing them together in writing her book. 

Image credit – uncpress.com

Myers then gave meaningful context surrounding the man whom Chinn was enslaved by and supposedly married to: Richard Mentor Johnson. 

Born in 1780, Johnson is dubbed a “war hero politician who killed Tecumseh during the War of 1812”. Despite his not killing Tecumseh, there’s more focus put on this than on his being a plantation owner and slaveholder. Myers points out that Johnson also claims to have attended Transy, despite there being no archival records to support this claim. There are records of him serving for forty-four years in public service, four of which were as Vice President. He also holds the title of the first Kentuckian to hold a seat in Congress. His time in the Senate is less glamorous, though. He lost his seat in 1829, and the reasons are unclear; however, this may be due to his relationship with Julia Chinn. This supposed relationship is the foundation of Myers’ book, as it has been tried to be covered up for decades. 

There are many layers to their relationship. The first being that they’re around 16 to 17 years apart. The reason why there isn’t an exact number of years between them is that it’s unclear when Julia was born, as she was born enslaved to Richard’s father, Robert. The Johnson family states that she had her first child at the age of 15 or 16 in 1812, which would have made her born in either 1796 or 1797. Considering the age gap between them and Richard being admitted to the bar in 1802 and elected to the Kentucky state house in 1804, there’s a good chance that they would’ve had little to no contact with each other growing up.

Another layer to their relationship is that Julia was enslaved and had never been free.  When Johnson was back in Kentucky in 1810, Julia was selected by his mother to be his housekeeper. This decision was sparked by his receiving a significant amount of land, on which he built a mansion called Blue Spring Farm. This title of ‘housekeeper’ was often given to enslaved women who were white men’s mistresses, and there’s speculation around whether their relationship was consensual or not. 

The meaning behind the title proved to be true in 1811 when Julia and Richard’s sexual relationship began, resulting in their first child together in 1812. Even though they ended up having two children together, they were never legally married because, until 1967, Kentucky didn’t allow interracial marriage. There are speculations that they secretly got married in the church that the Johnsons founded, Great Crossing Baptist Church. 

Despite multiple people claiming that the couple was married, Dr. Myers couldn’t find any official papers documenting their marriage. She explained that this could be because the Scott County courthouse had been burned three times prior to the Civil War. Although there are no official records of their marriage, Richard referred to Julia as his ‘bride’ in a letter to his friend, which suggests that they likely acted as husband and wife, despite the absence of an official marriage and the power imbalance between Richard, who was Julia’s slaveholder.

Myers puts heavy emphasis on the speculative nature of Julia’s life and her relationship with Richard. There are aspects of the story that we know are true, though. One being that Julia was literate and responsible. She spoke with local businessmen, oversaw the estates, and helped run the boarding school on their property, Choctaw Academy. She was responsible for being sure that every student was fed, healthy, clean, and clothed. Julia kept the school running. She also had her own house on the Blue Spring Farm, which was separate from Richard’s house, and had access to his line of credit, so she had a considerable amount of privilege at this point in history. Due to her enslavement, she wasn’t able to own anything and could have lost her house at any time. She was also in an odd position where she was enslaved, but also in charge of the slaves on the property. 

When Richard was gone in D.C., the enslaved laborers took advantage of this, knowing that she struggled to assert her authority, and simply didn’t have as much authority as Richard. This constant taking care of the farm and the school ended in July 1833 when Julia died. We see just how much the success of the school was dependent on Julia in the rapid deterioration of Choctaw Academy, which shut down 15 years later in 1848. She wasn’t in the Johnson family cemetery at Great Crossing Church because even though she and Richard were most likely married, she was still enslaved. In fact, we still don’t know where she was buried. 

The work that Dr. Myers did in order to tell Julia’s story is immeasurable. She met with Julia’s descendants, contextualized the timeline of Julia’s life and her relationship with Richard, and dug through public and church records. Through the writing of her book and this talk, one of Myers’ messages is that Julia’s story isn’t interesting. It’s important. The fact that barely anybody knows who Julia was illuminates how the U.S. continues to refuse to acknowledge the history of slavery and interracial relationships. All history needs to be taught—the good and the bad. 

Has the Well of SNAP Run Dry?

0

Americans across the country have had their social media feeds flooded with SNAP-related posts, videos, and calls for action. Users have reposted headings and articles centered around the decline of the federal program, spreading awareness of the potential elimination. What exactly is SNAP? How did it originate, and why is it crucial for millions living in the United States?

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, widely referred to as SNAP, is a federally funded program that distributes money for food to underprivileged Americans. Previously known as the Food Stamp Program, SNAP has paved its way to becoming the largest federal nutrition program in the country, feeding 1 in 8 impoverished persons per month. Amidst the federal government shutdown, nearly 42 million Americans are at risk of losing food and nutrition benefits. SNAP is not a new program by any means, though, hence the national pushback over the loss. How did it come to be?

The origins of SNAP date back to the Great Depression, as a way to distribute excess farm commodities such as wheat and livestock. With the passing of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 was established, providing more income for farmers and distributing food for the impoverished. Carrying out the mission in 1935, the Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation began to purchase, transport, and distribute food to relief agencies across the country. With the system seemingly replicating the services provided by the grocery industry, there was national defiance; in hopes of ending the discourse, Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace created the first Food Stamp Program. 

Klein, Christopher. “How Did Food Stamps Begin? | HISTORY.” HISTORY, 27 Aug. 2019, www.history.com/articles/food-stamps-great-depression.

Through years of research and experimentation, the Food Stamp Program was made permanent by the Food Stamp Act of 1964. Decades of implementation, expansion, and milestones led to the Farm Bill of 2008, changing the name of the Food Stamp Program to SNAP with the switch from paper to digital stamps.

As of today, SNAP helps Americans who are eligible to receive benefits towards food. Requirements to acquire monthly stamps include having a gross household monthly income at or below 130% of the poverty line. Recipients must also have proof of employment to maintain the average, individual amount of $187 per month. Upon achieving eligibility for SNAP benefits, individuals will be issued an Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) card, allowing for the purchase of food groceries. 

So, why is SNAP so important, anyway? And, how will the delay of payments affect Kentuckians? Well, the access to food provided by SNAP helps families in poverty, veterans, and disabled people. With federal help with allocating money for groceries, people in need can properly budget their personal money for rent, bills, and non-food essential items without the worry of putting food on their plates. By delaying and minimizing SNAP benefits from being issued to Americans during the government shutdown, only 50% of eligible households will be covered by emergency funds, leaving millions across the country on their own to find money for crucial nutrition needs.

Zooming into home, approximately 600,000 Kentuckians, 225,000 of whom are children, utilize SNAP. Such vulnerable citizens will be left with empty cupboards, despite Governor Andy Beshear’s efforts to combat the disruption by suing the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

I reached a grim realization when researching the USDA’s extensive history of the Food Stamps Program. Despite their official and accurate information, the message headlining the website holds an unfortunate series of words: “Senate Democrats have now voted 13 times to not fund the food stamp program, also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Bottom line, the well has run dry. At this time, there will be no benefits issued November 01. We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats. They can continue to hold out for healthcare for illegal aliens and gender mutilation procedures or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive critical nutrition assistance” (usda.gov). 

With the clear bias referring to the Democratic party, along with the negative connotation regarding immigrants and gender-affirming care, the issue of accuracy in governmental sources has become relevant. If we can’t go to the federal archives for information, where can we go? If we can’t rely on our government for properly budgeting money and resources during a shutdown, who can we rely on?

Staff, WKYT News. “Lexington’s Big Give Food Drive Launches amid SNAP Benefit Uncertainty.” Https://Www.wkyt.com, WKYT, 3 Nov. 2025, www.wkyt.com/2025/11/03/lexingtons-big-give-food-drive-launches-amid-snap-benefit-uncertainty/

All in all, the instability of SNAP benefits makes for a scary time in our country. If you or your family is struggling amidst the change, though, do not give up hope. The City of Lexington has partnered with God’s Pantry Food Bank and various community organizations to launch “Lexington’s Big Give”, a city-wide food drive. Collecting food for families across the Commonwealth, both God’s Pantry and The Family Care Center are available resources for Kentuckians in need.

You are not alone in this time of uncertainty. The well of SNAP will not run dry without a fight or support from our community.

The Mysterious Campus Insurance Plaque: What is it?

There are many odd things on the campus of Transylvania, from Rafinesque’s tomb to an insurance plaque no one even realizes is there. The marker isn’t a large monument, but rather a plaque on a rock located outside the Brown Science Center, in front of Hazelrigg Hall. This led me to question: what is it for and why is it here?

Thanks to the library, I was able to research the man who is mentioned in the plaque. What I discovered was very vague but interesting nonetheless. The man’s name was Thomas Wallace; he was a wealthy and successful merchant in Lexington. He also served on the Board of Trustees at Transylvania beginning in 1807 and resigned from his position on Friday, March 22, 1816.

If you read the plaque, it will mention The Insurance Company of North America (INA), which is the oldest capital stock insurance in the US, founded in Philadelphia in 1792, about 12 years after Transy was founded. They sold life, fire, and marine or boat insurance to people throughout the upper parts of the US.

Alexander Henry, who was an INA Director, proposed that they expand their company to Lexington, which was on the nation’s frontier. On January 26, 1808, the INA President John Inkeep appointed agents through many different places, one of them being Thomas Wallace in Lexington. 

This event has been credited as the start of the “American Insurance System.” In 1957, a plaque was put on Transy’s Campus to honor when insurance came to Lexington and their agent, Thomas Wallace.

The full text of the plaque reads as follows, for those curious:

“Here in the thriving frontier town of Lexington, Kentucky in 1807, The American Agency System of bringing insurance protection to America’s families, businesses and institutions was begun when Thomas Wallace, prominent merchant, was appointed an agent of Insurance Company of North America.

Thus, a free people, with initiative and enterprise, created a system of providing for their own security through independent local businessmen that spread throughout America, enabling the nation to grow and prosper.

1807 – 1957″

The full face of the Plaque

Communicating the Ineffable: An Interview with Artist Grace Ramsey

Have you ever been to an art exhibit in a moving truck? I have. My friend Lyra and I wanted to see how a U-Haul could be transformed into an art gallery. It was pretty cool, to say the least.

Transylvania professor of art Grace Ramsey showcased her work alongside University of Kentucky professor of art Rae Goodwin in one of Muse Collective’s “blink projects.” In this interview, Grace discusses the ideas behind the displayed pieces, the evolution of her creative process, and how her experiences contribute to her practice.

The Pop-Up at Blue Stallion Brewery

Grace said the Muse Collective reached out to her directly with an invitation to exhibit with Rae Goodwin. The show came together fairly quickly, which is typically how these pop-ups go. 

Grace: I love these little U-Haul pop-up shows because when you’re in the space, you kind of forget that you’re in a U-Haul. The Muse Collective has been doing them for a while now, so they know how to outfit the truck with these hanging walls. 

What makes a Grace Ramsey painting?

Kate: Would you describe yourself as a surrealist?

A Time to Reap

Grace: I don’t categorize myself as a surrealist because I kind of associate that with the movement itself, but most of my paintings incorporate surreal elements. I like to use the surreal, like magic, color, and pattern, to disrupt the realism and kind of allow the work to be interpreted by many kinds of people in many kinds of ways. When things get more detached from our reality, the language is more universal.

I also just think with art you can make anything, and with that kind of freedom, I’m more interested in getting weird, you know? I think that ritual, magic, color, and unknown forces are symbolic of being human. They open up doors and allow us to talk about things that are ineffable. 

Grace explained that the works in this pop-up show came from a period when she relied heavily on photographic references, both those she took and those she found. She reflected that the realism of this approach was time-consuming, and capturing a subject’s likeness was the least interesting part of the process. Over time, she has shifted toward more stylized, imagined figures rather than basing her work on real models or photos.

That One Piece

Latch

Grace described the origin of one of her more controversial pieces, Latch. She recalled being in the throes of early motherhood, nursing her five-month-old daughter, Marigold, nonstop. While visiting friends in New Orleans, Grace began developing ideas for new work and asked her friends and their babies to pose for reference photos. After several shots were taken, one of her friends suggested the idea of people nursing each other, which became the main concept for the piece.

Grace: It’s coming from a truly nonsexual place. Of course, they’re naked women, kind of intertwined, and people see it as an “orgy.” However, if you look a little more closely, it’s really tender and nurturing. It’s really about, as women, our ability to feed one another and nurture each other and connect in this way that is so animal. There’s nothing that will ground you more and make you realize that you’re an animal than having a baby.

Me: Yes. Anytime I think about motherhood and what women go through… one hundred percent.

The Most Eye-Catching Piece (to Me)

Possess All That I Am

Grace: This painting, Possess All That I Am, is inspired by paintings of the martyr Saint Agatha. There are several paintings out there that depict generally what’s happening here: a woman with no breasts, offering breasts on a plate or something up to God because she had her breasts cut off. Martyr paintings in general, I’m really interested in, especially because they often look very peaceful, but this terrible act of violence is happening to them.

Growing up as a devout Southern Baptist, many biblical stories and Christian art fascinate her and come up in her work. Although she is no longer Christian, Grace began her undergraduate studies intending to become a missionary and majored in Religious Studies. Over her college career and post-graduate life, she has come to redefine her values, which have shaped her into who she is today.

Your Evolution as an Artist and Teacher

In the evolution of her creative process, Grace has learned to let go of perfection and wholeheartedly trust her intuition. She acknowledges that details and meticulous planning have their place, especially for students with less experience. 

Grace: Slowing down and being thoughtful is really something students should practice. As you gain experience, these things can be put aside. If people don’t plan a little bit, as soon as they hit a roadblock, they’ll change ideas. We want to be able to pursue an idea, even when it gets tough.

A Perfectly Inspiring Event: The Kentucky Book Festival

I went to the Kentucky Book Festival, and it was one of the most inspiring things I have seen. 

When I was a freshman deciding where I wanted to go to school, I picked Transylvania, partly because of Lexington itself. The community of writers and readers that Lexington cultivates is full of joy and creativity. It is such an amazing opportunity to wander into Joseph-Beth Booksellers and find over 70 authors ready to talk about their books. The amazing range of literature made it feel like there was a book for almost everyone who walked in. 

The Book Festival (illustrated by K. Nicole Wilson, seen on the right) features three main stages where authors are able to discuss their work. Located in the upper level of the store, rotating authors spoke about their lives as writers, the inspiration and history of their books, and held a discussion panel and Q&A with the audience. The various stages had a theme for each panel, such as Appalachia, Writing for Young Readers, Cocktails, and Poetry. This brought authors from across a variety of fields, but allowed each panel to have an overarching theme in which authors could find common ground with each other. 

This opportunity for authors to come together was beautiful to witness. Kentucky Poet Laureate Kathleen Driskell discussed how writing is often perceived as something done in solitude and isolated from others. However, she argued that writing is one of the most collaborative things one can do. It felt amazing to see the conversation and intellect shared across authors and readers. 

As a Kentuckian, it felt particularly meaningful to introduce myself to Kentucky authors. Oftentimes, the world of reading seems so huge with millions of authors out there. The Kentucky Book Festival really highlighted how many truly amazing authors we have right in our own backyard. It was invigorating to see this community and to find part of myself becoming an attendee, adding more and more books to my “need to read” list. 

Witnessing the young children so excited about the books and authors was particularly dazzling. Recently, I have often found myself worried about how kids are no longer reading for fun. Social media has been a dominating force, and the lack of children reading has become daunting. However, I experienced the opposite at the Book Festival. Instead of seeing iPad kids, I saw attentive children at storytime and kids excited to receive a book signed by the author. 

Overall, the Kentucky Book Festival was pretty much the perfect event. As a college student bogged down with many readings, I often struggle to find time for my personal reading. The Kentucky Book Festival inspired me to make time and not give up on a hobby I love, simply because I am busy. I felt inspired to write, read, and support authors. 

Thank you, Kentucky Book Festival. 

Weather

Lexington
snow
28.6 ° F
29.1 °
27.6 °
85 %
1.9mph
100 %
Fri
34 °
Sat
36 °
Sun
28 °
Mon
30 °
Tue
39 °