Monday, April 14, 2025
Home Blog

A Minecraft Movie Review

This article was co-written by Lyra Duffy and Brenna Clark

Dude, have you seen the Minecraft Movie? Well, we saw it this weekend, and let us tell you, it was legendary, nostalgic, and everything you could ask for. Before the movie, we of course stopped at McDonald’s to get our Minecraft Happy Meals. While unfortunately they were out of stock and we had to get the baby Happy Meals, it was still pretty cool. We swiftly entered the Fayette Mall Cinemark and sat down for the most exciting hour and forty-one minutes of our lives. The theater was packed by the way– and what a cool range of audience members. From kids who play, teens who enjoy the campiness, and adults who find it nostalgic, this theater had it all. It all felt so fun and like a pure and wholesome experience. Seeing the Minecraft loading screen at the beginning of the movie was an amazing touch. 

Now, let’s get into it… Steve’s backstory was pretty legit, and Jack Black’s rendition of, “as a child I yearned for the mines” had the entire theater cackling. We were initially apprehensive for such a CGI-heavy movie– how were they going to pull it off and keep the nostalgia? We found ourselves happily mistaken as soon as Steve entered the Overworld. Although Steve was living happily and building with his trusty pup Dennis, he soon found himself jailed in the Netherworld. A ragtag band of randos soon find themselves in the Overworld and work with Steve to beat the piglin queen Malgosha and get back home. Nowadays, it can be pretty hard to get through a movie without seeing someone distracted on their phone. HOWEVER, this audience was so refreshing. With everyone engaged, laughing, and even.. Clapping at famous lines like, “I AM STEVE!” and “Flint and steel.” One of the highlights was the audience reaction to Jack Black singing “Steve’s Lava Chicken.” We love Jack Black so much and thank God he sang multiple songs throughout the movie. Throughout the movie, it felt very accurate to the gameplay. In particular, it felt so fun to watch such a bright and colorful movie. In addition to this, the classic plot of fighting the evil piglin just felt so nostalgic. 

Oh my God… did you guys know Jennifer Coolidge was in the movie too?! SPOILER ALERT– she falls in love with an escaped villager from the Overworld. We absolutely loved it and we wanted to see more of Jennifer. Honestly, we wish Jennifer’s character had gone into the Overworld. Within the movie, there were Henry, Natalie, Dawn, and Garrett who entered the Overworld and met Steve. Jack Black and Jason Momoa, who plays Garrett, absolutely killed it comedically. With Natalie and Dawn getting separated from the gang halfway through the movie, we wish that Jennifer’s character were there to balance out the comedy. 

Sadly, we felt like the women in the movie had such a boring plot line. They had such strong characterization for the men in the movie. However, Natalie and Dawn’s only contribution was building a mushroom hut. We just felt like there could have been so much more room for these characters to do cool things, but instead they were trapped in the traditional caretaker role for much of the film. While Natalie and Dawn did work to fight Malgosha at the very end, most of the emphasis was on Steve, Henry, and Garrett. The women characters in the movie felt very overshadowed. We felt like this reinforced stereotypes that the gaming community is built around men. 

We enjoyed all the little touches that made the movie so similar to the game. The monsters were so funny to see, and the enderman was legit so scary. In the movie, Henry looks into the eyes of an enderman… and was this a cameo to drop some new Minecraft lore? In the game when the enderman attacks, you simply take damage. However, in the movie, the enderman made Henry see all his favorite people saying negative things about him; what does this mean? 

As Minecraft players, we both enjoyed the movie. It was fun, action-packed, and so very nostalgic. It is a very easy watch and further reflects the childlike wonder you experience when you play the game. We were sad at first when Alex never appeared in the movie; however, if you were patient enough to wait for the end credits scene, she appears at the very end! We hope that this means there will be a sequel! If you are a Minecraft lover of any form, we think you’ll love it too. 

The Thomson Lobby Tragedy

The first-floor lobby of Thomson Hall, officially known as the Brian C. Wood Lobby,  is one of the most frequently used common spaces on the residential side of the Transylvania campus, and at this moment, the only major common space left on campus that is accessible to all students 24 hours a day. However, this space is under immediate threat due to plans from the administration that have been intentionally hidden from the student body. 

Several sources have confirmed to the Rambler that the administration plans to convert the majority of the first-floor lobby into a Virtual Reality (VR) lab for the 2025-26 school year, with construction in Thomson Hall set to begin as early as this May Term. VR labs are large open areas that allow users to don VR headsets and interact with a virtual environment, obstacle-free. The current plan would involve walling off the majority of the lobby – the carpeted section with tables and booths where the majority of students gather- and removing all the furniture. This new space would only be accessible via a crimson card reader. It is unclear how many people would have access to this VR lab and at what times a day. The communal bathrooms for Thomson Hall would be only accessible through the lab, so it is essential that at least Thomson residents have continual access to the space. As for everyone else, it seems likely that it will be a similar arrangement to the esports lounge in the Thomson basement and various DART labs on the academic side of campus: limited general access during open hours and access only to those with special permission after hours. 

Sources for the Rambler have confirmed that the funding for this project is coming from a recent $2 million grant from the Bingham Fund for Excellence in teaching at Transylvania, a fund that has the expressed purpose of investing in innovative classroom techniques at Transy. A press release from the Office of Marketing and Communication, released in the 1780 blog on the morning of Friday, April 2, said the following about the exact goals of the grant:

The $2 million investment prioritizes two key areas that create an enhanced student experience: classroom modernization and the further development of innovative digital learning spaces. Recognizing the classroom as the cornerstone of Transylvania’s educational experience, the plan allocates the largest portion of funding to upgrading dozens of classrooms with state-of-the-art technology. Additional targeted investments will be used to enhance campus DArt Labs (digital arts spaces), giving students and faculty access to cutting-edge resources and adaptable environments that foster creativity and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Nowhere within the press release is the specific plan of converting the first-floor Thomson Lobby into a VR Lab mentioned. In fact, despite the start of construction being less than a month away, there has been no official announcement from the university on the plans for Thomson Lobby. The only previous indication that a renovation was coming for Thomson lobby was IT preemptively removing features from the lobby, such as the two student-accessible televisions. 

This plan for the lobby becomes the second instance in a developing pattern of unannounced renovations of student common spaces. Over the past summer and stretching into the fall semester, the building that previously was solely Rosenthal Commons, the other student common space that had 24-hour access for all students, was transformed into the Sanders-Siebers Entrepreneurship Center. While the directors of the Entrepreneurship Center have made commendable efforts to keep the space open for all students, the current space is ultimately designed for classes and events; it looks and feels like a Cowgill classroom that has been placed on the residential side of campus. And while Rosenthal Commons had fallen into something of a state of disrepair by the end of last year, the Thomson first-floor lobby remains in relatively good condition and is used much more than Rosenthal Commons was. 

An anonymous Thomson Hall resident spoke with the Rambler about how the lobby is used both by those living in the building and the campus community as a whole. They said, “I see residents using the Thomson lobby at all times of the day…Residents tend to use it for studying, but many campus organizations use it as well.” The lobby has served as a convenient meeting location for all sorts of campus organizations. It has been utilized by FSL organizations for chapter events and as a meeting space before formals. Campus organizations, especially those hosting events later in the night, also often use the lobby; a frequently cited example was Transy Cru’s Midnight Pancakes event that is held in Thomson Lobby every semester. 

This consistent usage shows that the first-floor Thomson lobby has been one of the most popular third places for students on campus. Third places are usually defined as physical spaces that are not homes (first places) or workplaces (second places) that facilitate social interaction. A 2019 article published in the peer-reviewed public health journal Health & Place spoke to the characteristics and benefits of third places, stating:

These third places span a diversity of locations that are all defined by their ‘ordinariness’ – simple, unassuming, and usually affordable places to ‘hang out.’ People can meet, express themselves, relax, play, and build community, often at little material cost or personal effort. Beyond single instances of individual-level social interaction, third places can serve to generate social surplus: collective feelings of civic pride, acceptance of diversity, trust, civility, and overall sense of togetherness within a locale through sustained use and connection among residents

When looking at the Transylvania community, and considering classrooms and other educational spaces as a university’s second places,  there are admittedly a number of third places for students, such as the Great Hall (or Caf), the Beck fitness center, the library, and businesses close to campus like Third Street Stuff. However, all of these locations are held back by factors like limited hours or monetary barriers to entry, something that can not be said of the Thomson lobby. While the second and third floor lobbies could also be considered ideal third spaces under these criteria, they are much smaller than the first-floor lobby and less suited for usage by multiple groups at a time. Additionally, the upper-floor lobbies are more out of the way of students, with the majority of students not even realizing that they have open access to the lobbies from the stairwell, something that is not the case in any other residential building. 

The planned renovation of the Thomson lobby into a VR lab would turn it from a space that is open to and widely used by all students to one where it is currently unclear how much it would be used by students. Various students who have spoken to the Rambler have suggested that while they have seen Virtual Reality integrated into a few classes, it is currently fairly limited in scope. The Bingham grant that is providing the funds for the VR lab renovation likely includes funding to encourage more classes centered around VR experiences, though it is unclear what is specifically being done to encourage the VR lab to be used since no details have been announced to the student body. It is also unclear how classes that utilize VR will work around the fact that the lab will be located on the residential side of campus, far from every other academic building. Will professors hold classes inside the lab? Will classes be led to the other side of campus to use the lab? Or will professors require students to complete assignments in the lab outside of class? While some of this would undoubtedly be up to the discretion of individual professors, the lack of any transparency about how the lab will be used certainly does not help.

Classes that currently utilize VR technology do so in the basement of Mitchell Fine Arts, in the former Rafskeller space. Student Government Association President Sean Gannon told the Rambler that preliminary plans called for the lab to be placed in Hazelrigg Hall, which has sat empty on the academic side of campus for many years. This would be in collaboration with proposed technology-based renovations of Hazelrigg as part of Transylvania’s 2030 Master Plan. However, structural issues within Hazlerigg such as low ceilings led to the Thomson lobby being identified as a better space for the lab. Gannon suggested that there were still plans calling for an eventual VR lab on the academic side of campus, whether in a refurbished Hazelrigg or in a new connecting building between Hazelrig and Brown Science Center. If these admittedly unconfirmed and highly speculative proposals were to pan out, what would be the fate of the Thomson VR Lab? Would there be enough support for two separate VR labs on opposite sides of campus, or would Thomson lobby then be re-renovated back into a purely common space? With the goals of the 2030 Master Plan even less clear to students than the current Thomson lobby renovation plans, it will likely be a long time before any clarification can be expected. 

The lack of communication to the student body on the planned renovation of the Thomson lobby shows a troubling lack of transparency from the highest levels of Transylvania’s administration, one that is forming part of an unfortunate pattern when considering the transformation of Rosenthal Commons. It shows a profound arrogance on the part of the administration to not only hide this information from the student body, but from most faculty and staff as well, going above the heads of staff members who put in the work to connect with and hear the concerns of students. The lack of student consultation is another example of Transylvania leadership, especially the Board of Trustees, being totally out of touch and living in willful ignorance of the wishes and needs of students; notably the Transylvania Board of Trustees is just one of three private colleges in Kentucky that does not have a sitting student government representative. Personally, the response I have seen from students when told of the lobby plans follows in an unfortunately common belief among students: that Transylvania’s highest leadership is not actually concerned with the wishes of the student body, and that this seems like the administration grasping for something new and shiny to dangle in front of prospective students and raise enrollment numbers. And while, again, the renovation is coming from directed outside funding and can only be used for specific projects, it is sadly ironic that in a time where the university points to a lack of funding for why many issues go unaddressed, funding has come quickly for a project that much of the student body is actively against. 

If you are also concerned about these renovation plans for Thomson Lobby, share your concerns with Vice President for Academic Affairs and Dean of the University Dr. Rebecca Thomas, who is currently acting on behalf of President Brien Lewis during his leave of absence, through academicdean@transy.edu

Additionally, the Rambler has begun a petition on behalf of the student body to show that students do not approve of the plan to convert the Thomson lobby into a VR lab. Physical copies of the petition to sign can be found hung in Thomson Lobby, as well as with the following Rambler leaders:

  • Katie Axon (keaxon26@transy.edu)
  • Nate Brother (njbrother25@transy.edu)
  • Lyra Duffy (laduffy27@transy.edu)
  • Brenna Clark (baclark27@transy.edu)
  • Madalyn Stump (mestump26@transy.edu)
  • Becca Orjala (rnorjala26@transy.edu)

Everything to Know for SAB Stress Fest: Spring 2025 Edition

0

For the past several weeks, Transylvania’s Student Activities Board has been hard at work preparing for this semester’s edition of Stress Fest, a multi-day series of events held near the end of the semester designed to relieve the stress of finals. This semester’s version of Stress Fest features five different events, with SAB attempting to combine old favorites with exciting new experiences for the Transy student body. I was able to speak with SAB Vice President of Programming Maria Hayes (‘26) to discuss how SAB chose and planned this semester’s upcoming events.

The first Stress Fest event, taking place on Thursday, April 10,  will be Beads and Bubbly, a combined arts-and-crafts and soda bar event. Hayes spoke to the process that SAB employs when planning events, saying, “Before planning each event, we all come together as a board to brainstorm different ideas. We like to draw on previous events we have done, while also innovating them to keep them interesting and engaging.” This was a strategy that SAB employed when planning their second event for Friday the 11th, Paws for a Cause. This puppy playtime event is returning after a few years’ absence, with Hayes admitting that logistical challenges, namely bringing several puppies to campus and finding a safe and accessible place for them, initially dissuaded SAB from bringing the event back. For this version of the event, SAB is partnering with Dr. Ellen Furlong and the Canine Cognition Lab, but also with the Transy chapter of Alpha Omnicron Pi to support its local philanthropy in the Lexington Humane Society. Hayes gave special credit to these partners, acknowledging that they were “essential in bringing this event to life.” SAB’s third Stress Fest event, scheduled for Sunday, the 14th, is a returning favorite from last year, a Mister Softees truck in Old Morrison Circle from 4-6 pm. Hopefully this event, complete with a complimentary treat from SAB, will be as successful as last year and a great way to welcome in the warmer weather.

Monday, April 14 will see the return of the longstanding Reading Day tradition, Brinner. The sights and sounds of Brinner are likely familiar to all current Transy students: the lines wrapping around the campus center, faculty and staff serving food and striking up conversations with the students, and the Transy community coming together for one stress-free night before finals begin. One of SAB’s foremost tasks when planning Brinner is keeping the event unique to incentivize students to keep coming back every semester. This semester’s Brinner theme is “Orange You Glad It’s Brinner Time,” so expect everything from the decorations to mockatials and other items on the menu to have a citrusy twist. The final Stress Fest event, held on Tuesday the 15th, will be another returning favorite: Happy Hour at Third Street from 2-4 pm. SAB has been able to maintain a partnership with Third Street Stuff, a favorite study spot for Transy students, to guarantee a free coffee during finals for several semesters in a row. Hayes expressed SAB’s happiness with the partnership, saying, “Third Street Stuff is an amazing local business to partner with. They are so supportive of the Transy community, and students love visiting. It’s been such a great way to consistently provide students with a free sweet treat.”

The events of Stress Fest are some of the most anticipated of every semester and for many students, one of the only reprieves from the taxing final two weeks of the semester. SAB takes this opportunity to connect with the student body and provide some joy very seriously, and tries to ensure that the events consistently deliver a great experience. As Hayes emphasized, “SAB is so passionate about Stress Fest because we seek to alleviate some of the stress and worries from students by providing relaxing and fun events where students can connect with one another. By providing treats and other “pick-me-ups,” we also aim to increase the positivity around campus during finals week. I hope our events are something students can look forward to during stressful periods.” For additional information on the upcoming events, check in with @tu_sab on Instagram and keep an eye out for updates in Daily TNotes.

GALLERY: Lexington Gathers to Say “Hands Off!” to Trump and Musk

Learn about more “Hands Off” events using this link and read more with our article!

“I’m gonna tell you fascists

You may be surprised

The people in this world

Are getting organized

You’re bound to lose

You fascists bound to lose

Race hatred cannot stop us

This one thing we know

Your poll tax and Jim Crow

And greed has got to go

You’re bound to lose

You fascists bound to lose.

All of you fascists bound to lose:

I said, all of you fascists bound to lose:

Yes sir, all of you fascists bound to lose:

You’re bound to lose! You fascists:

Bound to lose!

People of every color

Marching side to side

Marching ‘cross these fields

Where a million fascists dies

You’re bound to lose

You fascists bound to lose!

I’m going into this battle

And take my union gun

We’ll end this world of slavery

Before this battle’s won

You’re bound to lose

You fascists bound to lose!”

– Woody Guthrie 

Note from photographer: Kentucky, I am proud of you

Lexingtonian Resistance: Hundreds Gather to Say “Hands Off!” to Trump and Musk

Saturday, April 5, 2025 was a day of organization and resistance nationwide, and Lexington was no exception. Chants of “Elon Musk Has Got to Go” and “No Justice, No Peace” echoed across downtown on Saturday afternoon as hundreds gathered in front of the Robert F. Stephens Courthouse to protest against the recent actions of the Trump administration. 

The protest in Lexington was just one of over 1,200 nationwide as part of the “Hands Off! National Day of Action.” The protests, the latest and largest in a series of nationwide protests since the inauguration of Trump that began with the #505001 protests in early February, were organized as a nationwide show of anger and resistance towards the actions of the Trump administration. These protests have come in response to the seemingly indiscriminate firing of federal workers and downsizing of key federal departments by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), hostility to allies on the international stage, ranging from sweeping tariffs to calls for annexation, mass deportations and other hostile actions against the immigrant community, executive orders targeting transgender individuals, efforts to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs across the country, and many more. 

On Saturday afternoon, protesters lined the sidewalks of Limestone with signs criticizing the actions of the administration, while more gathered on the courthouse lawn listening to a series of speakers, with chants of protest interspersed in between. An early speaker at the protest was Dr. Raeford Brown, a local pediatrician who spoke about the detrimental effects that could come with cuts to key services like Medicare and Medicaid. Brown spoke about how the often prohibitive costs of private health insurance make Medicaid the only option for hundreds of families across Kentucky, and how cuts to the program would be putting those people at risk. Brown stated, “If we take Medicaid away, we are literally taking away a lifeline.” Another speaker was Adam Moore, a member of the Kentucky House of Representatives representing District 45, which covers parts of Lexington. Moore, a member of the Lexington Commission for Veterans’ Affairs, recognized the veterans in the crowd before talking about how the actions of the Trump administration put many veterans at risk, especially those in the federal workforce. Referring to the veterans, Moore stated, “They are not looking for a handout. They are not even looking for a hand up. They are looking for promises kept on the promises that were made to them when they signed and swore to defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Moore pointed out that roughly 30% of the federal employees and contractors working in Kentucky are veterans, and their jobs are at risk due to the recent cuts to the federal workforce. Moore stated, “So when you hear Donald Trump, or Elon Musk, or Andy Barr saying it’s okay or that they deserve to lose their jobs, when they talk about reducing the workforce, they’re not separating wheat from the chaff. They are sending people home who are the reason we have a home.”

Rep. Adam Moore speaks to the gathered protestors.

Barr, the Republican congressman who has represented the Kentucky Sixth District since 2013, was a frequent target of both speeches and signs at the protest. Barr has largely supported the actions of the Trump administration, and has received criticism from local leaders and activist groups for what they allege is his ignoring the concerns of his constituents with these actions. Two weeks before the latest protest, a town hall was organized in the Kentucky Theater by local advocacy group Gathering for Democracy and former Lexington Vice Mayor Steve Kay, with the organizers inviting Barr to attend and address the questions and concerns of his constituents. Barr ultimately declined to attend, and the hundreds of Lexingtonians in attendance voiced their concerns to an empty chair.  A consistent message throughout the various speeches and signs at the “Hands Off!” protest was that silence and inaction amount to complicity with the actions of the Trump administration, and that large-scale organization and resistance are a powerful way to effect change. Following the success of “Hands Off!”, more protests across Lexington are sure to follow, including those led by Peaceful Bluegrass Resistance, an advocacy group that organizes multiple protests a week across Lexington. If you or anyone else you know is looking for ways to get involved, local organizations like these offer ways to organize and make your voice heard.

Bus Rapid Transit: What is it, and could it fix Nicholasville Road?

0
– Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Nicholasville Road is probably Lexington’s most infuriating road to drive on. Outside of the liminal emptiness of the middle of the night, the road has bumper-to-bumper traffic for miles. Personally, I will always avoid driving it whenever possible. The last time I found myself there was when I decided to give it another shot a few months ago after avoiding it a while, but when I was stopped in traffic where Upper and Limestone split, someone hit me from behind and totaled my car. Never again.

It comes as no surprise, then, that Lexington’s urban planners want to redesign the road. In 2023, the city of Lexington published a study that seeks to reimagine the road, making it more efficient and safer for not only drivers, but also the many pedestrians and bicycle users who use the road. Because much of Nicholasville Road is owned by the Commonwealth (as US 27), Kentucky’s Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) is currently preparing its own study to make its own recommendations. As an intern for KYTC, I was able to attend a recent meeting to discuss this project. It is obvious that something has to be done to this road, especially now that UK is planning to build a new cancer center nearby, and private student housing complexes are planned along Nicholasville Road.

Adding more lanes, the usual solution to this type of situation, is completely out of the question. Many previous expansions have left buildings so close to the road that there is simply no room to add another one. Even if Lexington wanted to go through the process to buy these buildings and demolish them to make room, many of them have historical preservation laws protecting them to avoid this. As a result, the planners are looking for other methods to alleviate traffic and make the road safer. Besides, adding extra lanes to a highway does not work once you already have a road as wide as Nicholasville Road, being ridiculously expensive for a project that often only leads to marginal traffic improvements.

One of the proposals that planners in both Lexington and Frankfort are considering that I am most interested in is a potential BRT route on Nicholasville Road, the first such route in the city. BRT, short for Bus Rapid Transit, is a bus service that attempts to emulate features of light rail transportation (the modern term for street cars or trams). This usually involves fare payment at the stops rather than on the bus, buses running more often than traditional bus routes, dedicated lanes for BRT buses only, among others.

If BRT lines behave similarly to trains, then why not just use trains? Many cities, like Cincinnati, Detroit, and Phoenix, use a light rail system. As much as I love light rail (if the Cincinnati Connector has zero fans, then I’m dead), it can be quite costly and requires a lot of infrastructure and maintenance that many mid-sized cities do not have the money, time, or public interest to take on. BRT is much cheaper in comparison and much easier to construct and implement. Instead of having to lay track, you might just paint the road. BRT systems can also be used as a proof of concept for future light rail networks, although in my conversations with planners around Lexington, that doesn’t seem to be the case here, at least for now.

Although BRT is not a new concept, the first line being created in the 1970s, it has only really taken off in the United States within the last decade. If the BRT is implemented, we wouldn’t be the first in the area. Louisville has a BRT line, serving the western half of the city from downtown, along the Dixie Highway, ending just before the intersection of Dixie and Gene Snyder. The list of stops and schedule was once available on TARC (Louisville’s transit authority), but as of March 2025, the link is broken. Cincinnati is also preparing to introduce BRT to the city, with two routes by the end of next year. Both routes originate downtown, where they run concurrently, then split off in Clifton (near the University of Cincinnati campus), with one going towards the northeast of town and the other towards the northwest.

The exact details are still up in the air, and are subject to change in any step of the design process, which could take several years, but the line would most likely start in downtown, stopping at several important intersections along Nicholasville Road, eventually terminating at Man O’ War or even out to Brannon Crossing in the northern end of Jessamine County. It would likely take about as long as driving down the road, with some minor time loss for stopping and boarding, but the dedicated lane could prove helpful during rush hour, and make the bus more enticing if you’re stuck. At certain points, especially in the more suburban areas of the route, there would likely be park-and-ride lots next to the stops.

Seasonal stops might also be implemented in front of Kroger Field, to be used before and after games.

Is the BRT line going to help with traffic on Nicholasville Road? I’m hopeful it will have some effect, but I’m not going to delude myself into thinking that it will solve the traffic problem completely. Honestly, nothing could really help that trainwreck of a road unless a lot of other people realize that there are multiple other roads that will get you where you need to go in about the same time. Research has shown that increased use of public transportation does reduce traffic congestion, so making this plan work will involve convincing people to use it. As I mentioned earlier, resilience against rush hour traffic could potentially be a selling point. The park and ride lots at some stops would also make travelling to multiple destinations along Nicholasville Road more worthwhile, considering the amount of time that could be saved by not having to search for parking at each stop.

Even if it doesn’t help traffic all that much, I believe that the BRT route, with other proposals in the full study, would help make Nicholasville Road less daunting for those who dare to traverse it by bike or on foot.
Side note: If you haven’t already, you should totally subscribe to Civic Lex, a free weekly newsletter explaining whatever Lexington’s government is up to.

High Schoolers versus The Commonwealth: Interview with the Students Who Filed a Lawsuit Against Kentucky

On January 14th, 2025, the Kentucky Student Voice Team (KSVT) filed a lawsuit against the Commonwealth of Kentucky, seeking to hold the state accountable for its failure to fulfill its constitutional obligation to ensure that all students have access to an equitable and dignified educational experience. KSVT has cited numerous issues such as declining literacy skills, lack of civics education, mental health crises, limited arts availability, and severe academic disparities. KSVT is a student-led organization that is focused on amplifying student voices in education policy and practice through research, policy, and storytelling initiatives. Students in KSVT have been involved with shaping policy, leading forums, publishing podcasts and articles, writing books, working closely with other organizations, and have now officially filed a lawsuit. 

For full disclosure, I have been a member of KSVT since July of 2023, and I am currently a board member. 

It isn’t every day that a group of mostly high school students is involved in this sort of litigation, so I interviewed two of these students to understand what this lawsuit means to them. Michelle Zheng is a senior at Elizabethtown High School, and Abigail Ladwig is a junior at Owensboro High School.

So first, tell me a little bit about yourself. Who are you as a student, and what are you involved in?

Michelle: That’s a loaded question. I’m pretty involved in high school, and I do want to add that I am an AP honor student. I’ve taken almost all the AP classes my school offers, and if not, then I’m in honors classes. Outside of school, I do a lot of extracurriculars. I am in FBLA (Future Business Leaders of America), I am in Beta Club, I co-founded the Environmental Club, and I co-founded the Young Democrats. I’m a part of KSVT, where I primarily focus on research and journalism. In my community, I do Teen Corps, which is a youth program for juvenile offenders. We, the volunteers, will go in and we will prosecute or defend juvenile offenders. And then there will be a kind of peer court and jury. Essentially, they will come up with a sentence for the offender, for them to try to rehabilitate themselves and rectify whatever offense they committed.  

Abigail: As a student, I’d say I’m pretty high achieving. You know, standard, like AP classes, I’m in the orchestra, I weightlift, I run track and cross-country. Right now I’m training for a half marathon, so I’ve been working out a lot. The hobbies I enjoy are just straight-up research. Right now I’m working on research for the science fair at the University of Louisville. My project is on chickens and how carotenoid supplements change their egg yolks. I love STEM, and I hope to pursue a career in environmental science or animal sciences. Beyond that, a lot of my extracurriculars focus more on policy and law, because that’s what’s available to me. I am obviously on KSVT but I’m also part of the Wendell Ford Government Education Center, where we learn about our local government and ways to improve it. I’m on the debate team, and the Future Problem Solving team at my school. I was a campus representative for Project Green Challenge in 2024, which is kind of like youth advocacy, but for graduate students, where we respond to prompts like environmental awareness and try to get information out to the public about how they can be more sustainable. I’m a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Steward, and I’m trying to work on a community project, where I try to help marine environments because Owensboro, where I go to school, is right on the Ohio River. And it’s a very polluted river, it’s not the worst, but it’s very polluted. I would not go swimming in it. A project that I’m trying to get started on is environmental education within elementary schools. My mom’s a public school teacher, and I hope to be able to utilize that connection to try to teach younger children to be aware that their actions have consequences on the environment. I’m probably forgetting about a lot of other stuff because I do a lot, but I promise I balance it!

Why did you join KSVT and what is your role within it right now? 

Michelle:  I joined KSVT because I was trying to get involved in statewide politics. KSVT is an organization that reaches out to students, and its main priority is elevating marginalized student voices across Kentucky. I remember writing my application for KSVT, and I wrote in there how I’m one of the five or six Asian American students at my school and how I didn’t necessarily feel included both inside and outside the classroom and social settings. That was what compelled me to do advocacy in education. You’ll find that there are echoes of that in my complaint for KSVT v The Commonwealth of Kentucky. In regards to research, I’m on the National Urban Leagues Student Advisory Council for Accountability and Assessment, and a couple of weeks ago, I went to New York City for a convening to essentially try to revamp or reimagine what standardized testing looks like. Moving towards project-based learning, Capstone projects, and theses because we’re finding that standardized testing isn’t equitable, especially in minority communities.

Abigail: I joined in December 2023, which honestly isn’t that long, but the way the Kentucky Student Voice Team is structured, you can move up and take a stronger role in some of these projects quickly, which is awesome. I joined because I felt like I wasn’t doing enough in my community. You know, seeing everything that’s going on in this world right now is just really heartbreaking, and I felt like I wasn’t doing enough. I would go home, study for my AP class, play the violin a little bit, and go run. But I felt like I wasn’t doing anything with my life. There was nothing that I could say I was doing, and it’s great to compete at stuff, to get medals, to run a race hard, or to compete, you know, for future problem-solving. That’s amazing, but it wasn’t satisfying. There was a hole in me that wasn’t being satisfied. And I heard about the Kentucky Student Voice team from a fellow student. And I decided, you know, might as well sign up and see where it can take me, and it’s taken me to a lawsuit. 

How have your experiences as a student in Kentucky shaped your views on education and the education system in general? 

Michelle: As a student in Kentucky, I did the Governor’s Scholars Program (GSP), and after meeting people from all these different types of schools, I found that maybe my school’s not doing what it’s supposed to be doing. My school is definitely doing its best, but in comparison to other students across the state, we’re not matching the quality of curriculum of these other schools, like DuPont Manual for example. There needs to be a little bit of a change in that sector. I have friends from, Somerset and Russell Springs whose schools are way more rural than my district is. And I found that, those students had no AP classes at all and no resources for standardized tests like the ACT. That has really made me realize that there are inequities in our system and those need to be addressed. 

Abigail: I love my school, don’t get me wrong, we’re a pretty awesome school. There are teachers who work hard, we have staff who care. You know, I once cried in my Dean of Instruction’s arms over something that happened, and I felt safe. We have police officers who keep us safe. The staff connects with students and tries to make everyone feel welcome. And so, at first, I didn’t think there was a huge issue with the education system in Kentucky. But as I got to high school, I realized that there was a really big disparity between me and other students. That has kind of shaped how I view things. I don’t want to say that the Kentucky public education system is a letdown, but why is someone from a different school seeming to have more opportunities than me? Seeing that has shaped how I view the education system, and just seeing how other students fare in their classes. I’ve sat in on general classes before, not AP, and I’ve seen just how the lessons are completely formatted differently. I get it that it’s not an AP class, but it was to the extent that I was like, what the heck? You’re not teaching anything. And I don’t blame it on the teacher; again, that’s the curriculum that they’re supposed to teach. Just seeing that firsthand as a student helped me realize that. And then, through the Kentucky Student Voice Team, actually being told to my face, this is what’s happening, and being able to relate those things that are happening in my school. KSVT has helped me realize that we have some stuff that we need to fix. 

What do you hope to achieve by being a part of this lawsuit and what does it mean to you personally?

Michelle: I really want to, for the most part, highlight minority voices in Kentucky because in my experience as a student, microaggressions are rampant at my school. Like in many other rural school districts, a lot of minority students have to deal with comments they receive from their peers or the school environment. Administrators are very complacent in trying to address those issues and I understand how the administration, being predominantly white, can be sensitive to the topic. However, minority students don’t necessarily trust these administrators to take proper action if they voice concerns about microaggressions in the classroom. A microaggression is not direct racism. Oftentimes, a microaggression can manifest itself in many different ways. The perpetrator of a microaggression doesn’t necessarily have to intend to be racist. It can be just subconscious, not realizing they are being racist or making stereotypical remarks. I definitely want to open up a conversation within our state with legislators and lawmakers to destigmatize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) because it is really impacting many students, including myself. For instance, one of my close friends at my school, who is Asian American, considered self-harming because of the microaggressions he’s been through throughout school. A lot of his peers made microaggressive, rude comments to him, and that really did a number on his mental health. I really want to emphasize that. Why are we demonizing DEI when not being inclusive and having those conversations of cultural sensitivity in the class is really hurting a lot of minority students? 

Abigail: Well, first I’d like to achieve actual change. I’d like politicians to wake up and realize that the youth of today are not lazy. A lot of older generations think, “My gosh, Gen Z is so lazy. They don’t do anything.” Okay, well I’m suing you – my gosh. I want people to realize that we are developing our future regardless of what other people say. The youth of today are strong, capable, and we are making a statement for ourselves. I’d like to see this result in a bill or an amendment to Rose or KERA, because it’s just not acceptable what’s happening right now. It just feels great to see change in my community. I love going to the elementary schools and volunteering with them and I look forward to seeing how they will react when there are improvements to their school system. And when they’re looking back, and thinking “the KSVT kids allowed me to have a better and brighter future in middle school and high school”. That just makes my soul really happy. For me, that’s enough. It’s just insane that politicians in our legislative system don’t think the same way. We should be helping each other, uplifting each other, and educating our kids, not withholding funding or trying to divert funding. I hope that with this lawsuit, we can spread the word that we’re not going to be one of the lowest in education anymore. We have youth who are advocating for a better tomorrow.  

How do you see the effects of inadequate education policy playing out in students’ daily lives? 

Michelle: Right now there is a national literacy rate decline. A lot of kids aren’t learning how to read. My sister’s in the 9th grade honors class, which has a teacher. But if you aren’t in the honors class in the ninth grade, you have a teacher who logs in from Zoom to teach the class from Switzerland. I don’t think that’s adequate at all! It’s a core class, and ninth grade is when you need to build on the foundations. My school’s average ACT score is really low, and we have standardized tests, but only a quarter of students are proficient at my school. A quarter, maybe a little bit more than that, of students at my high school are proficient in English and Math. State testing is very basic information, and if kids aren’t passing that, especially for those who intend on going into college, it’s really alarming. 

Abigail: I see a lot of kids that are my race in AP courses and a lot of kids that aren’t my race in lower courses, and I think that has a lot to do with discrimination because we have it signed into law that everyone should receive an adequate education, but we’re not. I do not have a single African American classmate in my AP Calculus course. I can think of other courses that I don’t, but that one is noticeable,  there is not a single person from a different race in this class, and that speaks volumes. That shows how our education system has failed. Why are we still letting this happen to our children? Beyond that, we get a lot of refugees in our school, and people who speak different languages. I see them being discriminated against, and being made fun of and they can’t even understand what people are saying. That’s not very welcoming. I thought America was supposed to be the land of the free, but it doesn’t seem very free when we’re making fun of people who are coming here to escape the poor quality of conditions in their home country. We’re having people who are refugees, people of different races being discriminated against, a white majority in upper classes, and all those combine to allow white children to succeed. We should have a complete balance. In a perfect world, we would. With a better education system, there would be more Black children able to succeed, more biracial children able to succeed, more Hispanic kids, would be able to succeed in Kentucky’s public education. 

Imagine that you have the Kentucky State legislature all standing in front of you. What would you say to the policy makers that is the most important thing for them to understand about the student experience in Kentucky? 

Michelle: I want to say that education should be afforded to every student and every student should have a high quality of education. That’s really basic. But I’ve heard adults say that, education is a privilege, and I somewhat agree with that to some extent because my parents immigrated here and I’m the first generation to be born in the US. So in some aspects, I do believe that yes, education is a privilege. However, with the “land of the free”, we live in America, and I feel like everybody should have the opportunity to have a good education. Where my parents grew up, there was a huge wealth disparity in China and they came to the United States for economic opportunity. I fully believe that education does, to some extent, equate to success in students’ lives. Education will play a really big role in employment and success so I fully believe that all students in Kentucky should have access to a quality and good education. 

Abigail: Well, they need to understand that I’m a person. The people who are going to school with me are people. We are humans. We are not statistics, we are not numbers, we are not test scores. We are people and we deserve all the same chances. They need to do more qualitative analysis of what’s happening in schools. They need to understand that what you may see on paper is skewed because, as a researcher, you can never just look at quantitative data; you always have to look at the qualitative side as well to get a full scope of everything. It seems like their policies and the funding that they’re allowing us to have are based solely on numbers. If I were face-to-face with a politician right now, I wouldn’t say a lot. I would just say, please hear me. Just hear me, see me, and understand me. Understand what I’m saying to you because, again, I’m not just an object at a desk; I’m a person. The only way to have a strong community and better the Commonwealth of Kentucky is to treat people as people, not as a result of a bill, or ignoring minorities. They see high test scores, they see a high ratio, and they decide  “The school did really good.” But wait, we need to look at the demographics that are doing good. And it would be very important to politicians to see who’s succeeding and who’s not in those demographics. 

How has being a part of this movement towards education equity influenced you or affected you as a person and a student? 

Michelle: As a person, I’d say it’s made me feel empowered to speak on my experiences in the classroom, and not be afraid to express myself and express some of the inequities that I faced as a student. Because the first step to making any change is addressing the problem. 

Abigail: When I was younger, I used to not really care all that much about other people. Which sounds terrible, but I’d see a student struggling with a test and I’d be like, “Thank God, that’s not me.” But now, after all of this, I’m starting to realize that they’re not struggling with a test because they didn’t try; they’re struggling because the system let them down. It’s allowed me to be more compassionate, more open to other things, more understanding, and more educated. You know, if the system’s not going to educate me on civics, then I’m going to educate myself. It’s allowed me to have conversations with people who view the same things as me, and it’s allowed me to have new friends, build confidence in myself, and connect with a lot of other cultures. 

What changes do you hope to see in Kentucky’s education system as a result of this lawsuit, both short-term and long-term? What are you hoping comes out of this?

Michelle: I hope teachers get paid what they deserve. My teachers throughout high school and even middle school have complained about teacher pay. Very high-skilled teachers oftentimes will work at higher-level schools like private schools and schools like Manual rather than schools in rural districts because they get paid a little bit more. That perpetuates a cycle of inequity because you have unqualified teachers, like online teachers, teaching classes in these more rural districts, and suburban districts where their communities are a little bit more underserved. We need more funding for transportation. Like the JCPS busing crisis that happened last year. In the short term, I think infrastructure needs to be addressed first. Funding primarily, but then long-term wise I definitely do think that there needs to be some guidelines when it comes to civic education, and requiring civics classes before taking the civics exam. Making those classes a requirement and advocating for cultural sensitivity. Having adequate civics education, mental health resources, and cultural sensitivity training for staff members is important. Having resources where minority students can go to express their concerns and not be ignored by the administration, if that makes sense. We need to hone down the 7 Capacities of Rose for sure and ensure that schools are following those guidelines. That is what I want to see in Kentucky because I feel like funding is good and all, but it’s kind of like throwing spaghetti at a wall.  It might be really good, but we need to be mindful of what we are funding. 

Abigail: Well, I don’t expect there to be an increase in funding. It would be amazing to see an increase, but I really don’t expect that, especially with the policies going on with our current president. I don’t think we’re going to have any more funding in Kentucky to go around. I just hope to see more students pursuing harder things, like women in STEM, minorities in STEM, and underrepresented people in STEM. That’s what I really hope to see. I hope to see more student activists like KSVT, which is pretty small in comparison to the state. More students should be empowered to be active community members. I don’t want a curtain to be drawn over students’ eyes. I think using this and creating real change out of it would result in more students being literate in today’s global issues and being more culturally understanding. I don’t want students to feel like they can’t pursue something because of their race, gender, or how they identify, or where they’re from, or how much money they make. I want kids to all feel like they have the same exact opportunity, both in Kentucky and compared to other states. One of the things about Rose is being able to compete for college, and having a competitive resume. Right now, I don’t think Kentucky stands a huge chance. I don’t like standardized tests; I don’t think they encapsulate what a student is, but you can see a clear trend – students who are better educated usually score higher on those tests. I’d like to see us rise up, and being from Kentucky means that I have a passion to see us improve. So that’s what I hope will happen. I just want to see students who are future leaders truly excel. 

For one final question, is there anything else that I haven’t asked you about today that you would like to say?

Michelle: I would say that, again, going off the microaggressions, I do feel that it is very stigmatized in our legislation to understand what a microaggression is in the first place. I think that speaks volumes about how uneducated we are in learning about different cultures. We really need to have more of a pluralistic approach to history where we have all sorts of perspectives involved in our history classes. History classes should be very much impartial, so that students can think for themselves and formulate their own opinions. In civics classes, we need to engage in these challenging conversations because students are facing racism in our current day-to-day lives. Lack of conversation breeds ignorance among predominantly white communities. It’s really important for our classes at school and educators in the school system to truly try to enforce ways to try to combat that and dismantle that ignorance. 

Abigail: If I could speak directly to Kentucky students and educators I would say first that I’m sorry this is how it had to happen. I’m sorry that it can just be given to us, but I’d ask them to join me, to take my hand and to not be afraid to fight. After all this work with KSVT, I’m not as scared anymore. I want more people to stand up and rise up. 

Through their advocacy, research, and storytelling, students like Michelle and Abigail have made it clear that they will not stand by as their peers are denied the education they deserve. Regardless of the lawsuit’s outcome, their work has already sparked critical conversations about Kentucky’s public education system and the role students must play in shaping it. As they continue their fight for a more equitable and dignified educational experience, their voices serve as a reminder of the urgent need for education reform.

2025-26 Student Government Association Election Results Announced

0

The results of the latest Transylvania Student Government Association elections, held on Tuesday, April 1 to elect the Executive Council for the 2025-26 school year, are in. The results were sent to The Rambler shortly after being announced during the scheduled SGA meeting on Wednesday night, and have also been posted to @tu_sga on Instagram. The 2025-26 SGA Executive Council members are:

President: Sean Gannon (’26)

Vice President: Lakyn Totten (’27)

Chief of Staff: Kate Polson (’26)

Chief of Finance: Reagan Rawlins (’28)

Dining Disaster: Everything We Know About the Sigatoni’s Culinary Calamity (April Fools 2025)

0

In early February, a sequence of events in the Pioneer Rooms, colloquially known as “The Pio Rooms,” raised concerns among the Transylvania community. It all began with Transylvania’s chapter of the Delta Sigma Phi fraternity’s annual philanthropy event: Sigatoni’s. The faux-fine dining Italian experience was going as planned when students began to notice something that most reasonable students would overlook. 

In a seemingly unprecedented move, prior to opening Sigatoni’s for that year, the setup within the Pio Rooms had received a health inspection. Later, sources within Delta Sigma Phi would claim that the health inspector had received anonymous tips about possible violations even before the temporary restaurant had been set up (many would cast blame on the meddling of members of the rival Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity). While Sigatoni’s had no previous standard to compare to, patrons to the event were shocked at the failing score of 86.

While an 86 would score as a “B” on your final exam, this score is closer to a “D” in the eyes of health inspectors, and a far more realistic final exam grade for most readers. More curious was the fact that the inspection notice was blocked from view for large portions of the night by Sig members intentionally standing in front of it, who would yell incomprehensible gibberish in a mediocre Italian accent at anyone who approached the notice.

Once revealed, the health code inspection listed a multitude of violations, including Temperature Control for Safety, Food Sources, Toilet and Handwashing Facilities, and Sewage. A few non-standard additions were made to the inspection notice. In what could be interpreted as an attempt at emphasis, the box marking a failure for Good Hygienic Practice was marked down multiple times and circled with a red marker. Additionally, the boxes for Insect, Rodent & Animal Control and Personnel were both marked, and a line was drawn connecting the two. It is unclear what the health inspector was trying to communicate with this gesture.

While members of Delta Sigma Phi were quick to dismiss the score as “not a big deal,” some Sigatoni’s patrons may disagree. There have been reports that Sigatoni’s patrons who ordered the Mushroom Bolognese experienced psycho-hallucinogenic effects shortly after leaving the event (though this matter is being investigated separately). There has been at least one documented report of poisoning arising from the event, that being from the Rambler’s own Editor-in-Chief, Katie Axon.

Axon, who is still recovering from the incident, reported that she chose to dine at Sigatoni’s that evening to save a meal swipe. Axon’s waiter for that evening happened to be former Rambler Editor in Chief Jack Thomas. While some witnesses to the scene believed they saw Thomas slip something into Axon’s food, the Rambler has not confirmed these reports. All that is known is that when the health inspection notice was revealed, Thomas ran over to the notice, wrote the numbers 1 and 9 on either side of the score, and claimed that the notice was merely a reminder of the year 1869 when Delta Sigma Phi was founded (Thomas did not respond to Rambler requests for comment when he was told that Delta Sigma Phi was in fact founded in 1899). Thomas then fled the scene and has not been seen since.

When visiting the hospital after the poisoning, Axon’s doctor informed her that an abnormal number of Transy students had recently been admitted for treatment, including one who had been injured in a yet to be solved hit and run. Katie decided to share this with her peers, and replies began flooding in. The common thread? All those who had been injured in some way had “crossed’ Jack Thomas. This raises many especially alarming questions. Will Jack Thomas ever be caught? How many more untold victims of his crimes are out there? Will Transy ever again be able to have a faux-fine dining Italian experience hastily set up in a mixed-use event space? What crimes against humanity did Thomas commit at the Great Bowls of Fire event? There are many questions still left unanswered, and only time will tell what is to come of this situation.

The Rambler will continue to cover this story as necessary, and hopefully, someday, this menace to the campus community will face justice. 

Note: This is a satirical article created by The Rambler to celebrate April Fools’ Day 2025. The events described in the above article are purely fictional.

Candidates for SGA Executive Council Participate in Debate Ahead of Elections

On the afternoon of Wednesday, March 26, six days before the scheduled April 1st elections for the Student Government Association Executive Council for the 2025-26 academic year, six candidates, all running for various positions on EC, gathered in the Strickland Auditorium. All six participated in a debate and town hall hosted by The Rambler, where they made their case for why they should be voted into SGA office and fielded questions from the student body. Dozens of students made their way to Strickland to hear the pitches of various candidates and ask questions, while more watched as the entire debate and town hall was streamed live on The Rambler’s Instagram. The six candidates who participated in the debate were freshman Brayden Strong, running for Chief of Finance, freshman Delta Pirkle and junior Kate Polson, each running for Chief of Staff, sophomores Lakyn Totten and Max Hankins, each running for Vice President, and junior Sean Gannon, running for his second term as SGA President. 

Debate moderator Lyra Duffy opened the debate by asking each candidate what motivated them to run for their respective positions and what unique qualities they could bring to the role. A commonality for most of the first-time candidates was a desire to contribute more to campus and create greater change, citing leadership positions they had held previously both as evidence of this drive to encourage growth in their community and experience that would qualify them for SGa Executive Council. As Polson eloquently summarized, “I knew I wanted to give my time and attention to the meaningful work on campus. I found SGA to be the vehicle for that work.” 

Sean Gannon emphasized that he was coming from a different position, having already served one term as SGA President. Gannon highlighted the work that SGA has done this year under his leadership, and, in a theme he would revisit multiple times throughout the debate, emphasized how he had the rare opportunity to go into next year with a year’s worth of experience in pushing the administration to respond to student concerns. As Gannon put it, “This past year has been some of the most productive work we have ever seen SGA do…with the experience I have gained, I can continue to amplify this even further.” 

The debate moved along with each candidate being asked general questions ranging from serious issues, such as what the top priorities of each candidate would be, and what each candidate sees as the biggest challenge facing the student body. There were also more light-hearted questions, such as what color each candidate would choose to represent their campaign and what each candidate’s preferred SGA superhero name would be. 

A through-line of many of Strong’s responses was his desire to promote and uplift all student organizations. This was the first point he went to when asked what his top priority as Chief of Finance would be, stating, “One of my main goals, along with running daily finances, is to give these clubs the opportunity to get some of this [financial support] that we offer so they can get events going on campus.” Strong cited his club-centric experience in SGA, including two projects designed to promote student organization events and opportunities to the student body. 

Polson continually emphasized the need for SGA to maintain open lines of communication between SGA and the student body, echoing similar arguments by other candidates that a primary goal of SGA should be continuing to emphasize transparency. Polson stressed that, especially during current turbulent times, it is paramount that SGA provide a consistent level of support to students. Polson seeks to ensure this constant student support from SGA by pushing for engaged senatorship by members of SGA, primarily in the form of projects designed for that goal. Polson emphasized that she would “strive to be a resource for those projects.”

As their top priority, Pirkle emphasized creating personal relationships with the senators of SGA in order to facilitate a closer, more open, and more cooperative student government. As they stated, “I want to try and get to know the senators and be someone they can go to when they need help with projects…I just want to help.” Pirkle hopes that this plan of interconnectedness between senators would show dividends in SGA’s attempt to reach out and connect with the student body, touching on the theme of increased communication and transparency that was echoed by other candidates. 

Totten focused on what she categorized as “a disconnect between faculty and student life,” especially when it comes to the resources and support provided to students. Totten hopes to highlight existing resources for student wellness through SGA projects and events, and ti push for increased recognition and respect for student wellness, especially mental health, among faculty and staff. Totten set this lack of mental health recognition as one of the biggest challenges facing the student body, stating, “Education is why we are all here, but at the same time, you can not pause your own life and you can not pause your own health.”

One of Hankins’ primary goals for the upcoming year is to streamline positions within SGA to divide up workload among senators so as to increase collaboration and more efficiently accomplish tasks for the student body. Hankins argued that this collaboration fits well with the small and tight-knit student community of Transy, and it increases the likelihood of students coming together to create real change. As Hankins argued, “It is easy to lose sight of the power we have as students with our smaller size. I think that, both through student government and as the individuals who keep this institution running, it is important to keep that in mind and find ways to implement what we need on campus.”

Gannon unsurprisingly, was the most explicit of all the candidates for what his goals for the upcoming year would be should he be re-elected president. He emphasized the three keys to his platform being advocacy, accessibility, and accountability. In Gannon’s eyes, advocacy is the most important of the three for himself because he sees the role of SGA President as the student body’s voice for the administration. Many of Gannon’s goals involve advocacy towards the administration, such as securing an SGA Representative on the Transylvania Board of Trustees and pushing for increased transparency and student input on Transylvania’s 2030 Master Plan. In regard to the Master Plan, Gannon stressed the importance of ensuring student involvement, stating, “What do we do when certain foundational things are not given? Yet the school is expecting more money from us, and is now making a plan to expand the university that will only cause harm to us. More importantly, they don’t even ask our opinion on the matter so they don’t know what will harm us until it already happens.”

After general questions, the debate moved into specific questions for candidates for each of the four executive council positions. Chief of Finance candidate Brayden Strong was asked what experience he has in handling and organizing funds, where he pointed to his experience working at a local independent insurance agency and at his high school’s admissions office. For Chief of Staff candidates Kate Polson and Delta Pirkle, they were asked about previous experiences working with other people and how they would handle conflict between senators. Polson pointed to leadership roles she has held in other campus organizations, such as T-Unity, Muslim Student Association, and the Writing Center, and outlined her objective, common ground-based approach to conflict management. Pirkle highlighted their previous experience as an ambassador for their high school and the number of students they interacted with in that role, and half-jokingly referred to their experience babysitting for how they would deal with senator conflicts. For Vice Presidential candidates Max Hankins and Lakyn Totten, they were asked what they believed their role working with the President would be ike and what specific initiatives they would lead to better student life. Totten emphasized the importance of clear communication between the President and Vice President, so as to set a clear example for other senators. Hankins emphasized the flexibility in the duties of the Vice President when compared to the President, highlighting his ability to support the President while serving as a point of contact for senators. Sean Gannon was asked what motivated him to pursue a second term as SGA President, circling back to the unique opportunity for continuity in pressuring the administration to properly address the needs of students. 

The rest of the debate served as a town hall for students in attendance, with those in the audience posing specific questions to each of the candidates. The candidates discussed various topics, such as the importance of upholding DEI initiatives in student government and how each candidate planned to properly balance their SGA leadership obligations with their academic obligations. For specific questions, Strong was asked to address a past situation and how he had learned and changed from the experience prior to potentially taking on a public-facing leadership role, and Gannon was asked to elaborate on his relationship with the administration and how he has worked to bring issues like the 2030 Master Plan to the attention of students. 

This article is just a small portion of what each candidate had to say during the debate. SGA Elections will be held on Tuesday, April 1, so be sure to watch the video below to get a full sense of the goals and priorities of each of the candidates:

Weather

Lexington
clear sky
61.5 ° F
62.8 °
59.9 °
56 %
3.5mph
0 %
Mon
71 °
Tue
65 °
Wed
56 °
Thu
65 °
Fri
72 °